22 Nov 2016 10:08:13
Does anyone actually think Van Dijk is any good or an improvement on what we currently have? Do you ed? Also why is everyone asuming we are after him? Is it because he is a Saints player and had an ok game aganst us or are we genuinly interested ed?

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of Liverpool making any approach to Southampton for VVD - nor to his agent.}


1.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 12:21:01
He is a very good centre back in my opinion. We need another centre back to compete with matip, Gomez and lovren. Sakho is going and everyone else we have are not good enough.


2.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 13:24:32
As with Lovren, do you not think he's been made to look much better by Fonte's organisation and discipline?


3.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 13:38:58
I agree with you 100%. It's not about individual players it's about the partnership between the two. You can have two players who are not the best individually but amazing together.
I just know we need another centre back, however I couldn't tell how well he would sit with our other centre back, that's the manager and scouts job. A lot will come with training but sometimes with certain players it just happens.


4.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 13:43:41
I agree with you 100%. It's not about individual players it's about the partnership between the two. You can have two players who are not the best individually but amazing together.
I just know we need another centre back, however I couldn't tell how well he would sit with our other centre back, that's the manager and scouts job. A lot will come with training but sometimes with certain players it just happens.
I am really impressed with Matip, not so convinced with lovren but in my opinion he is definitely good enough to keep. I would try to get someone to go with Matip and keep lovren and Gomez for back up and rotation. This is we improve defensively in my view.


5.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 14:22:00
Cheers for reply ed.

Redwin. we have matip Lovren Klavan Gomez and Lucas already. It makes zero sence adding another cb? He will be megga expensive and eds has said no interest.


6.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 14:41:27
LFC forever,
Klavan is not good enough and Lucas not a centre back. Lucas is only a back up plan, I wouldn't want him in that position for a sustained run of games.
Lovren long term is not the answer either if we have he ambition to be the best so what do you suggest we do to improve at the back?


7.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 15:56:49
Lucas is a better cb than sahko.


8.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 17:21:32
Redwin

I know what your saying but all I am sayin is we have 4 centre backs plus Lucas vying for 2 places. Before we bring anymore in we would need to move some on. The talk about Van Dryk has only come about because he is a Saints player were we like shopping from.

Eds, can i ask your thoughts please on if centre backs is an atea we are looking at recruiting in?

{Ed002's Note - I have explained who the club has been looking at.}


9.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 17:52:57
How is lucas a better cb than sakho? He'd be first choice if he didn't have a terrible attitude.


10.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 17:58:11
There's no way we're in for him.
It's just idiots in the press making rubbish up because he had
a decent game against us.


11.) 22 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016 22:34:53
Sepp really.


12.) 23 Nov 2016
23 Nov 2016 01:35:33
We need someone top drawer to partner Matip, am convinced its not Lovren and unfortunately Sakho has ruined his chances with Klopp. I hope Gomez will get there but his injury and inexperience mean that that's at least 18 months away. I doubt we will go for Van Dijk, irrespective of ability, but due to cost surely Klopp will be looking at the Bundeslige again for a partner for Matip.


13.) 23 Nov 2016
23 Nov 2016 13:38:20
I don't think the Lovren-Matip is as bad as people are making it out to be. Sure, Matip is the better player but Lovren has improved a lot under Klopp. Lovrewn is as good or better than Cahill, and I don't see any slating of Cahill anywhere. I think the differences between Van Dijk and Lovren are that Lovren is probably a tad quicker and more agile, whereas Van Dijk is a more imposing figure and better in corners and set pieces. Now it's up to the club if they want to spend 20-30 million for these differences.


14.) 25 Nov 2016
25 Nov 2016 00:43:23
I think that the whole defence will sbow a steady improvement at the same rate as Karius gets experience.
The more that they play together the better they'll get.
I think Lovren could finish the season with 5+ goals
Which could be crucial.