14 May 2015 07:01:58
I noticed from some posts here recently that Andre Wisdom is coming in for a lot of stick lately. I myself would be more than happy for him to play as our RB next season. Defensively solid player. Be more than happy to go with him and Manquillo as RB options. Not sure why some wouldn't be happy.

1.) 14 May 2015
14 May 2015 09:00:19
He's not good enough . Honestly . He's game and puts a lot of effort and commitment but ultimately I don't think he has the ability at he's feet

2.) 14 May 2015
14 May 2015 09:51:29
I think he is a good squad player, and IMO it's between one of him or Flanagan. The modern day full-back needs to be comfortable on the ball, and be attack oriented, athletic and quick with ball at his feet, and neither of them are any of that. With Flanagan out injured, I would keep him in the squad for a year, and make a decision on both of them next summer.

3.) 14 May 2015
14 May 2015 10:25:47
5ive I have to disagree with you and say that Wisdom is good enough. He is good on the ball and his passing success rate is always in the high 80's to low 90's. He looks to get forward support the attack and due to his pace can get back to cover. He is arguably our best defensive right back. For me, he should be in the squad next season, and be getting regular game time.

4.) 14 May 2015
14 May 2015 11:00:56
I don't think we've seen enough of him in a Liverpool shirt to really judge him. He looked okay before though prone to errors though hopefully experience erodes those. To be fair I think the same could be said of Flanagan before he got in his extended run. Definitely worthy of the squad, the first 11 maybe he needs more time to develop.

5.) 14 May 2015
14 May 2015 11:05:23
If he can't get into a Tony Pulis side then he could be good for us as we like to play good football and TP can't recoginse a good player

{Ed001's Note - Wisdom is so much better on the ball than people give him credit for, I don't where this fallacy came from that he is not, probably the same people who think Sakho is useless on the ball, because it is nonsense. The reason he was moved out to fullback in the first place was because he was good on the ball.}

6.) 14 May 2015
14 May 2015 14:10:09
You have no idea about how Pulis and his dreadful tactics can get the worst out of players. Take a look at Stoke when he was manager. They were God aweful to watch and frankly, they would not look out of place in the Rugby League or the NFL. Now, look at how better they are with Hughes who has made them much better to watch with some of Pulis` own players playing better footie. Pulis is a very low bar, if not the lowest to use to judge a player`s ability under him.

7.) 14 May 2015
14 May 2015 15:38:30
Ed, I was suggesting he's good and a good player, just in a sarcastic way because Pulis is a destroyer of good exciting football - so if TP ain't picking him then he might be a player.

{Ed001's Note - I was agreeing with you mate, I was referring to an earlier post by 5ive.}

8.) 14 May 2015
14 May 2015 19:28:39
Me as well.