07 Mar 2017 15:28:27
Hi eds. I know its probably early to say but do you expect Henderson, Lovren and Sturridge fit for Burnley? I don't think they trained today.

{Ed001's Note - Henderson is a possibility, Lovren was supposed to be back to fitness now but Sturridge is out for the month, probably.}


1.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 16:49:16
Ok mate cheers. 2 out of 3 ain't bad and it has to be said that Hendo and Lovren are more important than Studge.


2.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 18:07:03
matip looks decent with klavan tbh. henderson imo is most important.


3.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 18:21:57
It doesn't really bother me on Lovren. He has one critical mistake every game. Either you are punished or you are lucky. Another Klopp's fav trust worthy!


4.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 19:19:22
Agreed harry.


5.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 19:40:08
Lovren has improved some aspects of his game under Klopp. If it was not for Sakho's antics Lovren would have been on the bench and Klavan most likely would not have been signed. However, Klavan's performance vs Arsenal deserves to keep his spot and expect him to feature alongside Matip vs Burnley.


6.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 19:40:59
How do you know he's his fav? Did Klopp or Lovren tell you that? Don't be fooled by Klopp's hugs and public defense of players who clearly are not good enuff. He hugged the life out of Jordan Ibe last season. Remind me of where Ibe is now, again?


7.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 20:29:36
Agree with Noah on this. Klopp is an emotional guy. He goes ballistic when we score. To say Lovren is one of his favourites is quite premature. I doubt Klopp would have blown £20m on Lovren based on one season?

Lovren was left to Klopp from the previous regime. Like I said, if it was not for the Sakho debacle then Sakho would have been lining up alongside Matip this season. No freaking doubt when Sakho was one of the first players on Klopp's team sheet last season.


8.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 20:06:51
Lovren should have been sold last summer for a top class CB. We would be inside top 3 without a doubt had that happened!


9.) 07 Mar 2017
07 Mar 2017 21:14:45
Lovren would have been sold at a considerable loss. We probably still would have to give him away for less than half what we paid for him so easy to say he should have been sold last summer as none of the top teams would have taken him and none the teams lower down the table would have been able to afford his wages.

If we want to get rid of Lovren it will be Liverpool taking a massive hit at this point. We have the exact same problem with Mignolet. We will be stuck with them two unless they decide they want to throw the tell in and look for another club themselves meaning they will have to accept what others are willing to offer.


10.) 08 Mar 2017
08 Mar 2017 10:46:33
Max

And how many teams are in the line for Lovren and Mignolet at present?


11.) 08 Mar 2017
08 Mar 2017 21:36:30
That's the point, Harry. Not many cos they're not good enough. But this is England. As long as we don't price them out of a move, someone will pay decent money for them. See how we got CP and Bournmouth to sign Benteke, Ibe and Smith from us for a combined 55m? Now that's great business from Klopp.