27 Apr 2017 10:23:10
My mates keep banging on about the ox! Sick of it. Does anyone actually want him and see him as an upgrade on I dunno markovic? If rather Marko got a bloody chance!


1.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 11:03:54
He would be a high risk, expensive transfer - in my opinion it would be one to steer well clear of.


2.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 11:03:32
OX will represent another similar tale in the transfer window. Buy utility players and play them who ever is injured. I think the club has learned nothing from James Milner who had a better stats than OX in midfield. There is a reason he doesn't get pick ahead of Ramsey, Xhaka, Carzola and many more CM at Arsenal.
Yes ofcourse He Runs all day!


3.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 11:14:37
I think he's a great player I think he could be kind of like Sturridge when we got him from Chelsea, not enough games to show his talent just needs a team that will play him week in week out. I think he could kick on with us. Versatile, very quick, decent shot. From watching Arsenal play this season he is the only player I saw that showed any fight. I would get him if there was a chance.


4.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 11:27:07
@UEFAlona - mate Xhaka has been awful for Arsenal, slow clogger who contributes very little his signing has been the wrong one for them. Ramsey is great on his day but inconsistent and has serious injury issues. Cazorla is an excellent player but with a different skill set to Oxlaide-Chamberlains. By no means am I saying we should sign him, just pointing out that not getting picked for Arsenal should have no bearing on the reasons for us signing or not signing him.


5.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 11:55:06
No-one likes markovic either then?


6.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 11:47:49
Gnabry of Bremen or Frank Acheampong of Anderlecht are better buys.


7.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 14:57:53
I rate him. Less risk than a player with no premier league experience.


8.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 16:05:28
Id rather just take Marko back. If we are looking at ox being a wide player there will be better options plus coming from arsenal we would have to over pay i would imagine unless his contract is up? Furthermore i know he's been okay in the middle for Arsenal but wouldn't put him anywhere near infront of what we have already in terms of a starting line up.

I think he has potential but his career hasn't really progressed Wenger doesn't seem to be a fan of his, never finishes 90 mins and it isn't due to fitness now.

Just see it as very risky (costly also) and probably better alternatives.

Would like to see him do well at Arsenal though.


9.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 18:43:18
Markovic might or might not be better, but I would definitely give him a chance before making an expensive utility signing.


10.) 27 Apr 2017
27 Apr 2017 18:41:04
Even better, leek. Julian Brandt. As for Ox, the guy is not good enough and won't even start in our first 11 when fit so again, what is he doing here? He's not good enuff and we can definitely do better at a cheaper rate too.


11.) 28 Apr 2017
28 Apr 2017 08:44:16
Honestly im with the op and harry on this one, poor attitude for me and not what this team needs. Rather give woodburn and taa the opportunities tbh.