24 Jul 2017 18:59:13
Seems Liverpool have adopted a stance with vvd as we will only bid if saints contact us, which has to be the right one. Yes we want him, and we have acted despicably, so if saints think too much damage has been done, then we should stump up the fee and whatever terms they want. Will go a little way to repairing the damage we have caused. It's a shame as I feel we would have got him if we did things the right way and probably saved money. If saints want to keep him, or would rather negotiate with someone else, fair enough, who can blame them for not wanting to.


1.) 24 Jul 2017
24 Jul 2017 20:00:17
Don't you think you're being a little bit over the top? Despicable? Most of the Liverpool bashing by fellow reds fans seems to be to appease eds002, who literally hates LFC.

{Ed002's Note - No I don't, I have simply explained things that are completely true. I can do it again if you would like? Or are you in denial?}


2.) 24 Jul 2017
24 Jul 2017 20:05:42
spot on mate.


3.) 24 Jul 2017
24 Jul 2017 20:32:44
I'm not doubting your facts but you speak of LFC and Klopp with extremely barbed tongue and some fans seem to copy it, i'm assuming much to your delight.

{Ed002's Note - I don't really have an opinion on what the fans do and don't do. I am simply explaining what I know to be corrrect. It is not barbed, and I don't like having to explain things over and over. It is very tedious for me. But I have nothing against Liverpool - and I have a whole bunch of chums who are supporters. I also know a few of the players from years ago - obviously not the boneheads who were local to Liverpool that could hardly string a sentence together. I have nothing against any side - it is no more than a game.}


4.) 24 Jul 2017
24 Jul 2017 20:48:27
I find it interesting that VvD only wants to go to us. This must surely be because of the contact we have had with him. Most likely we sign him for 60m in a week or two. If we followed the book, maybe we would have been outspent by city, united or Chelsea in a bidding war? Maybe this is the only way we get VvD, even though it steps on some toes.


5.) 24 Jul 2017
24 Jul 2017 22:19:54
People are so sensitive nowadays.


6.) 24 Jul 2017
24 Jul 2017 22:38:05
It's nothing to so with appeasement. We are a top club, we didn't need to play silly beggars with these teams. We are in the wrong, end of.


7.) 24 Jul 2017
24 Jul 2017 21:53:01
I agree it's over the top too. There seems to be a lot of double standards going on in this game, the days of Gerrard and carregher type loyalty is over now. Look at suarez, look at Sterling to name but two. Yes we moan at the time but it happens s to us too. Klopp got caught being directly involved . so what, it's dog eat dog out there and I want our kloppaterrier to be the one who's eating. come on, let's just be ruthless and get vvd. We will all be moaning when so. eone else does and we're leaking goals still next season. I would rather be a hated successfully club than respected for our principles u nsuccsessfull.


8.) 24 Jul 2017
24 Jul 2017 22:56:54
Zag, ed002 has nothing against LFC, I think he actually loves liverpool fans more than others if you look at the time he invests in us compared to other pages including the CFC page. The only problem is that he/ she wanted a one night stand with Klopp and he/ she was rejected because Klopp only prefers a she.


9.) 25 Jul 2017
25 Jul 2017 03:43:11
Seriously, what's the point in talking about our transfer mistakes all summer. This site is worrying about them more than Liverpool or Southampton by the look of things. If we haven't learned this time then I dunno what to say but move on!