Liverpool Banter Archive March 11 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

11 Mar 2015 22:22:03
Au revoir Chelsea, destroyed by ten men. Shame.

Believable11 Unbelievable3

11 Mar 2015 22:41:35
This is what it's become, revelling in superior league rivals misfortunes.

As charlie skinner would say:Chelsea got knocked down! Liverpool didn't get taller

Agree7 Disagree11

11 Mar 2015 22:51:05
Glad they are out. It would be nice to see Arsenal go on and win it although looking a little unlikely now.

Agree7 Disagree1

11 Mar 2015 23:34:28
They deserve it. Been getting lucky with results for a while now. PSG clearly a better team.

Agree10 Disagree1

11 Mar 2015 23:49:11
I don't really see the joy, our European coefficient will go down and only Arsenal realistically have any chance of going through and it is slim at that.

Chelsea drew and got knocked out it happens, Chelsea are a better team with a better manager but played worse on the night, we got knocked out a long time ago by Basel and Ludogorets. I want the English sides to go as far as possible in Europe (bar United if they make it of course). It benefits everyone in English football really.

Agree4 Disagree7

12 Mar 2015 03:14:54
Losing is not the problem. The fact that Mou`s pointless mid-games backfired, parked the bus even after going a man up, underating the might of PSG who are a VERY good team aeven at 10 men nd most of all, his constant negative tacticshe employs to to the oint of paranoia were the parts I found funny. Many in the media think Mou is above criticism regardless of his antics (which didn`t fly in Italy and Spain because unlike the hacks in the English media, they actually know better) and had another manager did what he did, he would be called every name in the book. Hence, Mou got outcoached and out-thought and on this game, he was a crap tactician and pretty much set his players up for failure due to his own over-inflated ego.

Agree13 Disagree7

13 Mar 2015 14:11:40
I don't care about other teams results as long as they don't impact on our teams progress, It is worrying though to see perms teams including ourselves in the euro comps this year

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Chelsea going out impacts Liverpool's co-efficient.}

11 Mar 2015 17:07:04
Eds, I know this isn't strictly about Liverpool, but if, say, us and arsenal were to finish 3rd and 4th what would the financial implications for United be? Would they still be in a position to spend >£50million on one player in the way they were last summer just because they are such a strong global brand? Or would the lack of competition prize money and TV money force them to 'tighten their belts' so to speak? And even if they could would they still have the ability to attract players ahead of us even though, theoretically, we would have made Champions League 2 years in a row?

Believable0 Unbelievable4

{Ed002's Note - They have the money to buy who they want and the owners will continue to invest in order to get the club back to where they perceive it should be. In 2017 or so they will seek an exit. They will struggle to attract players when not in the CL, but I cannot answer your question about the attractiveness compared to Liverpool. Manchester is a dreary city and I don't like the surrounding areas. Liverpool is full of people who do nothing but whine and talk about Chelsea. I cannot see there would be much in it.}

11 Mar 2015 19:10:51
Ouch!

Agree2 Disagree2

11 Mar 2015 20:58:25
You been to Liverpool mate? Best night out outside or London bar Newcastle, full of friendly people and we don't give a dam about Chelsea, just man utd

Agree18 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 20:34:49
Hope they do continue to invest heavily to be honest. It's working well for them.

Agree15 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 23:36:36
Haha!!

Agree1 Disagree1

12 Mar 2015 04:24:26
Ed002 - I had pubs in the 'surrounding areas' - Oldham, Bury, Rochdale, Failsworth and Heywood. Without directly insulting the towns I will leave you with the promise that I have no intention of going anywhere near the places for the remainder of my time on this earth. My God what was I thinking.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Mar 2015 09:14:17
Spot on lerchy

Agree2 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 17:32:11
Just read the momentous news today from the Hillsborough inquest. Hoping that this will be a huge step forward towards justice for the 96 and a degree of closure for their families. Love and peace to all those affected. YNWA.

Believable16 Unbelievable0

11 Mar 2015 13:04:48
It appears Brendan has decided we need another Spanish player even if he plays in a position we have tons of players for :) because most of his young Spanish signings have done so well so far :) paez, manquillo, aspas & alberto! Moreno has done well I think so that's why he's not in the list. But seriously do we need to spend a rumoured £7m on vasquez? We have sterling, ibe, markovic, lallana. And an academy of ojo, canos, Kent & wilson who all have potential to play that position. Is he throwing more money away? We need rid of ballo, lambert, borini, aspas, alberto, enrique and could get a fee of sorts for all of them perhaps around £25m. We have to sell to buy as we all know players like gerrard, Johnson and probably the likes of toure and Lucas also leaving. If we assume ings, origi, sturridge will be our strikers plus a big tent type signing. A midfielder maybe a big tent player and a goalkeeper

Believable1 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - It is more complicated than that with the money. I wouldn't go there.}

11 Mar 2015 17:21:05
Maybe it's just routine scouting. I agree we don't need anyone for an attacking midfield position now. Maybe it's lazy journalism from what Ed002 said here and some journalist copying it; it has happened before too hasn't it.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 17:50:01
IMO, Nothing to see here YET.

Agree0 Disagree1

12 Mar 2015 08:24:31
Last season we lost Suarez, had one person in mind to replace him that we failed to secure and we all agreed it was pathetic that we didn't have other people and options in the same bracket lined up. This season our scouts appear to have been more visibly active in many more positions across the field, even currently well stocked ones, and people take pot-shots? Come on guys. It's called being prepared

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Mar 2015 22:47:39
Sorry but based on the Ed01, we did have options that would not replace him like for like BUT would have helped a lot more than Balo would have BUT BR rejected all of them including Bony and Remy whih is why a DOF is paramount for next season and going forward otherwise the shambles tht we saw and have seen since BR`s been here will defo continue.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 11:33:07
If we were to show real interest in cech this summer and aquire him, he would be a fantastic signing. He will have a pick of a good few clubs. Experience, winner and leader in the dressing room and a top goalkeeper albeit not quite as good before his head injury.
We will see what happens but he would be my preferred choice as a fan.
What goalkeeper (realistically) would fans want at the club this season?

Believable13 Unbelievable3

11 Mar 2015 11:53:53
I think big Simon is worth keeping as r number 1 cech is not coming to us to sit on the bench.

Agree6 Disagree9

11 Mar 2015 12:06:34
Tommy cech would be our no1. Simon might of had a few decent performances but this has always been the problem and left us in the wilderness for years. Having players who aren't good enough having abysmal performances.costing us vital results. So keep Simon as first choice and next season it's the same Story? As with skittles. We need a top goalkeeper in this summer to help us progress not regress.

Agree5 Disagree6

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool has expressed an interest in a number of goalkeepers - but Cech is not one of them.

11 Mar 2015 12:41:13
Edd002. I know, it doesn't make sensethat we have shown no interest but that's the usual transfer makings. But my point is it hope we buy a top goalkeeper so we can begin to push on and improve other areas

Agree3 Disagree1

11 Mar 2015 14:30:35
I hear Iker Casillas wants out of Madrid.

In reality, I don't think there's a single keeper out there on the cheap that's better than Migs, I'd rather keep Migs and hope 1 of the youth players proves to be good, than fork out huge sums for a keeper. I think a keepers deficiencies can be compensated for by a solid defense.

Agree5 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 15:53:31
bobatron, did you see Madrid last night and more importantly Casillas? He was awful and that sums him up when he is put under pressure, he just isn't a very good keeper, he has just been lucky to have been behind some very good teams. Complete waste of money going for him as he is poor on crosses and isn't a great shot stopper.

I would rather keep Migs and look for a good up and coming keeper as backup(Not Matt Ryan though, as he is pretty woefull too!).

Agree6 Disagree1

11 Mar 2015 17:59:46
Casillas has been poor over the past few seasons and to me is WAY pst his expiration dateand needs to go. Keylor Navas is his deputy and judging by his WC in Brazil, should be the no. 1 GK. BUT Casillas is one of the kingpins in that DR hence, it will take a forklift to move him away from RM. As for Mingo, I think if BR in some qarters has earned another season for the results we`ve had lately then so does he. If we can get a much better GK (Navas would b my preference but Cech is not bad either) than him then keep him instead of getting another keeper just for the sake of it. And the ones we are linked with now IMO, are not better than he is especially in the form he is in atm.

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Mar 2015 18:01:47
I agree that Casillas hasn't been very good for a couple of seasons, but to say he has been lucky with good teams and isn't a very good keeper is just wrong. He has easily been amongst the best keeper in the world for 10 seasons.

Agree0 Disagree3

{Ed001's Note - sorry but he has never been a good keeper and was only Spain's first choice because he played for Madrid. Awful keeper, always been dodgy.}

11 Mar 2015 18:49:53
Edd001. Do you not think our transfer committee is poor as with Rodgers signings. IMO we never aquire the player that would be a great choice at the time. There has been many players over the years that wanted to join Liverpool and were viable and we bought poor alternatives. It makes you think regardless of managers, had we are great transfer policy and with the money spent were we could be right now

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 18:49:53
Edd001. Do you not think our transfer committee is poor as with Rodgers signings. IMO we never aquire the player that would be a great choice at the time. There has been many players over the years that wanted to join Liverpool and were viable and we bought poor alternatives. It makes you think regardless of managers, had we are great transfer policy and with the money spent were we could be right now

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I think they need one man making the decisions and it to be a DoF, rather than a committee.}

11 Mar 2015 19:21:46
Disagree w/ you a bit on the casillas bit, Ed. IMO, he has not always been dodgy. He has come up with great saves and perfs for RM and to me, his dodgy perfs even then came from that dreadful galacticos era where playing defence was not in their vocabulary hence, left him severely exposed. In fact, RM don`t win the CL in 2002 vs Bayer if he doesn`t make a last ditch kick save against a teenager named Dimitar Berbatov in a season where he was actually benched for over half the season by Cesar. remember a game vs Barca in 2009 where he made EIGHT saves and still conceded SIX goals as Barca won 6-2. That is suicide and there`s more where that came from in terms of scores. I`m not saying that he isn`t dodgy because clearly he is and his faults are still there BUT to say he`s always been dodgy is a bit over the top.

Agree1 Disagree2

11 Mar 2015 19:24:08
BR has the "kid in a candy store" nature about transfers and that is why he is simply woeful at it. He has no strategy and vision hence, buys a bunch of players and sees what sticks and what doesn`t. The only thing that can cure this chronic syndrome is a DOF and him being removed completely from the process.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 19:53:13
I saw his performance last night yes, and quite franky his poor performances over the last 3 years or so. When he first started out I thought he was a very good keeper. I still think if he goes back to basics he can be that again.
I half agree with Ed he's not deserved to play ahead of others for spain at times, nor navas, and lopez last year. But as the young keeper I saw first come on the scene I thought he was brilliant and deserving of his reputation and caps(on that point I would disagree with Ed001)
I think personally a lot has to do with the dressing room. He's had his troubles with managers and players at Real, and has been caught in the middle of the big rivalry in spain with friends either side which in games clearly affected him for me. I think a new club could do him good.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 20:59:13
Committees only work if one turns up, and the rest are either stuck in traffic or in hospital.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Mar 2015 01:06:31
I don't mean to be a douche here, but to say that Casillas has always been a bad keeper is almost funny. You don't win everything you can win with both club and country if you are rubbish. Almost 500? Matches for Real Madrid and 150+ for spain World Cup and Euro gold, 3 times Champions league. Its kinda like saying Raul only scored because he played in a strong team.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - you do if you have the best team in front of you. Almost every team has ended up with one player that is lucky to be there. He was a leader, but not a good keeper. You are not a douche, just falling for the media lies about a man they loved, the same as Everton fans did initially about Martinez. Casillas has never been top class, never been good enough for Madrid, but he was a local boy with fans backing in the past, and that guaranteed him a place, especially as Raul and him were best mates.}

12 Mar 2015 03:18:30
Well said, Lenin and Boba!

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 10:31:15
hey eds is it true that Yesil will be back with U21s in a month time or so after he recoverd from a double cruciate ligament injury and that he will get his chance to show what he is made of ?. ;

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I really don't know but he won't be rushed.}

11 Mar 2015 17:13:30
I thought Yesil was out of contract in the summer?

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Mar 2015 18:58:46
Nope, its June 2016 so hopefully he gets a chance during pre-season to impress for 2015/16

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 07:53:05
Hi eds can any one tell me what's going on with Ryan McLaughlin looked the next big thing to come out of the academy.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - he suffered a number of injuries which have held him back.}

11 Mar 2015 06:12:54
Hi ed01 I see yourself and Ed002 produced an excellent update on what our summer dealings may bring. I see carvalhp was mentioned if we could raise funds and secured champions league. Can I ask if kondogbia is one you would consider. He is a similar type player but looks better to me. How would you comprare the 2. I just wonder if carvalho gets overhyped by the media / super agent as he seems technically a bit short and looks powerful but slow?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - personally I would take him, but I doubt he would be available, that is why he is not mentioned. I am not sure on Carvalho either, sometimes he looks top class, but then you examine his play and realise the opponents made him look that good, giving him time and space.}

11 Mar 2015 08:05:36
Ed1 I've read the posts and can't find the post where ed2 has giving out transfer update and targets??
The ks

Agree2 Disagree2

{Ed002's Note - Much of this will change by the summer and there are major dependencies on (a) players leaving (b) how much money the club can raise through sales (remembering that Liverpool will be probably be looking to sell players by January to offset FFP issues), and (c) Champions League qualification. However, there is known to be (or have recently been) some level of interest in the following players:

GK: Ochoa, Neto, Sportiello (unconfirmed at this time), Romero, Ryan, Ruddy. The club have also looked at many others.
RB: Danilo (certainly won't happen). I am not sure what will happen to Wisdom. I suspect a new deal for Flanagan but if Manquillo and Johnson both leave then the club will look for a new RB. If Rodgers remains as manager it is not out of the question that Ibe may be tried in a wing back role. Alternative is that Manquillo stays and RB is no longer a priority.
CB: I suspect a new deal will be offered to Toure and the club will have to have a clear out of CBs in any case. I doubt a CB is a priority.
MF: Milner, Khedira, Pjanic (outrageously expensive), Vazquez
F/W: Ings, Vietto, Gameiro, Baez (a WP would be an issue initially), Kishna (I understand that old interest has been rekindled but it is hard to see how he would fit in), Lacazette (not going to happen). Two other players the club were interested in - Bakkali (I suspect Liverpool have stepped back from their interest like many other clubs) and Andre Ayew (a free agent who Liverpool enquired about last summer - no obvious interest right now but it may return).

If Liverpool do qualify for the Champions League and if further funds can be made available through sales, it would not be out of the question for Liverpool to look to one of the following as an option:

GK: Cech
MF: Carvalho, Turan
F/W: Benzema

And who would be my choice of players who will be available?

GK: Handanovic
RB: Darmain
CB: Balanta - Caniggia wanted Liverpool to move for Balanta more than two years ago - and he has got better. Rogers ignored the advice. He shouldn't have done. If Liverpool need a CB
MF: Matuidi, Morgan Sanson
F/W: Mitrovic - I don't see a long term future for Lambert and Mitrovic would give Liverpool a very good option that they are missing right now. Rodgers will regret using the words "Origi" and "world-class" in the same sentence. }

11 Mar 2015 08:54:16
Ed2 excellent post thanks! I would love benzema surely we couldn't compete with United and psg ? Marquis I would be a good signing! Carvalho is not sure about,

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 11:03:38
Edd002 can I ask what sort of money Chelsea will be seeking for cech? Not exact figures ofcourse but will it be a substantial amounT? Thanks

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Chelsea would ideally like Cech to stay but I rather suspect the player will want to move on. I can't imagine Chelsea looking for more that £10M for the player - perhaps less.}

11 Mar 2015 11:25:58
Cheers mate

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 12:04:58
If Chelsea are willing to let a world class player like Cech go for less than 10 million GBP, then LFC should make an offer without thinking. The club desperately need a top notch GK and such an opportunity should not be let to pass by without at least trying. Migs is good but Cech is better.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool has shown no interest in Cech so far. £10M is a great deal of money. Cech will no doubt have other options and I will want to be first choice for a Champions League club. This isn't fantasy football.}

11 Mar 2015 18:31:05
Ed002 you pick out your available choices i'm just wondering if lfc have shown interest in the names you have picked?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Not at this time. Obviously I know much more about the game than The Nose, but I don't have an Xbox or whatever it is to do my research on like him.}

12 Mar 2015 04:24:14
Great insight Ed002 was wondering when you said 'sell to buy'are we talking selling players like sterling, coutinho or other big name first teamers or fringe players. I.e balo, borini & players like that? I just noticed some pretty expensive players on the list likes of benzema & turan?? Cheers for all your info.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You clearly failed to read what I wrote.}

11 Mar 2015 06:12:23
Not completely Liverpool related but it does apply to us and may effect us more in future seasons. But ed01 or Ed002 why are English clubs so poor in Europe at the moment? Is it the intensity of the BPL? Is it poor managers/tactics? Or is the strength of the EPL that overrated?

I mean maybe I'm slightly bias towards English teams but if we look at the last round of UCL and EL. I expected us to get past besiktas, I expected arsenal to have beaten (or at least not loose) to Monaco at home and I expected spurs to get past fiorentina.
I know all the above teams are decent but I'd class all 3 leagues as being weaker and none of the foreign teams mentioned are above their English opponent in their respective leagues, I've not looked at the form guides but I know all 3 English teams are/were on relatively good runs.

Rather long post for a simple question but would appreciate the reply. Cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - they just weren't prepared properly. Liverpool and Arsenal prioritised the league. City were too open. Spurs just aren't ready yet, they need another season under Poch. Everton have done well, but they prioritise it and aim their whole week's preparation around being in best shape for Europe.}

11 Mar 2015 01:32:06
Hi eds,
I do not understand our interest in Turan. How many attacking midfielders do we want? We already have Sterling, Countinho, Lallana, Markovic and Ibe.

With Gerrard leaving and in case we sell Lucas, buying a DM makes sense.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - Turan wants to join us, he loves the club, that is a big plus when considering signings.}

11 Mar 2015 08:39:35
Don't want to piss on the bonfire ed but Robbie Keane and Rickie Lambert both loved the club. In the case with Keane it was an unmitigated disaster and with Lambert he looks as though he is on his way out as well. I'd buy players for positions which need filling not just because top players are available. Look at Man U, too many players to play in the hole.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I never said it would be my choice, though Turan is a quality player, I just don't see the need for him either. We turned down the chance to take him before, because of worries over injuries. I am not sure why Rodgers has this desire to add attacking midfielders each transfer window. That is one of the main reasons we need someone else over him to point out the strength we have in that area and so to target other signings.}

11 Mar 2015 08:51:10
I've watched a lot of Atletico Madrid games this season and Turan is a massive player for them. He would be an amazing addition to our starting 11.

Agree5 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 11:33:56
He can add composure and ball retention to our attack, something none of our attacking midfielders have. Eventhough I'd much rather have Pjanic.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 12:08:16
Turan is an amazing player but the club should have used their brains before signing Lallana and Marko to save money for Turan in the summer. There will be a number of unhappy players if another first team CAM joins the club this summer namely Lallana and Teixiera. Also he would be expensive so unless Lallana or Marko move on, there is no need for Turan. The money should be used first and foremost for a ST and GK instead of tinkering with something that has already been fixed.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - What money would that be?}

11 Mar 2015 13:55:58
Ed002, i meant the money the club used to buy Markovic and Lallana could have been used to sign a more established player like Turan in the summer. Now its too late because the club does not need another CAM when so many have already been brought in.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You said "The money should be used first and foremost for a ST and GK". You are not talking about the AL and LM money there.}

11 Mar 2015 15:05:12
Oops sorry about that. I meant the money the club would get from selling players this summer which i accept will not be much so the funds need to be used wisely than spending on luxuries like Turan. The club clearly needs a ST and GK so money should be directed to those positions before anything else is planned. My entire point is that if the club wanted Turan so badly then the transfer should have happened last summer instead of the coming one.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Mar 2015 18:24:00
Robbie keane got screwed by rafa because someone else signed him to be fair and ricky never got a chance also if sterling was to leave i'd love turan as other wise were well stocked there

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Mar 2015 03:20:33
As good as Turan is, I just don`t think he is what we need right now and defo NOT at the price AM would quote for him., IMO.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Mar 2015 12:46:22
Turan is a good player, but he is 28 and he has also had a few big injuries, we should have got him when he was younger.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Mar 2015 22:49:21
Exactly!!

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent