Liverpool Banter Archive January 12 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

12 Jan 2015 21:09:41
Players who are simply not good enough (if in doubt use the filter 'would they get anywhere near Chelsea, Man City or United's squads' or 'does my heart sink when I see their name on the team sheet'): Brad Jones, Jose Enrique, Glenn Johnson, Joe Allen, Richie Lambert, Fabio Borini, possibly Dejan Lovren, Mario Ballotelli. That's 2/3 defenders I'd swap for one good one like a Cahill (another missed opportunity) and 3 strikers plus Joe Allen that I'd swap for Ross Barkley. Surely their combined wages would be enough to tempt Ross?

Believable6 Unbelievable1

Have we just signed Richie Lambert?

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 23:45:09
Bit early to be calling for Balotelli and Lovrens' heads isn't it?

Seems like the same lot was saying the same about Markovic, now he's our hero.

Agree4 Disagree0

Nevermind Cahill, I still can't believe we missed out on Kompany. Somebody needs to be sacked for this shambolic mess.

Agree0 Disagree0

I still reserve some hope for/faith in Allen, Borini and Lovren, if they are utilised properly.

I agree on the others though.

On Enrique. I have mixed feelings.

Do you guys remember him playing as a wide-forward last year?

He was awesome there - I recall we were saying he was like Bale. lol. Seems like a dream now - and a reminder of the awesome force that was Suarez - they were ripping up the pitch together!

Alas - those halcyon days are gone, I understand that. But what of him at LB?

His poor decision making is grating, yes, and his ball-hogging at LB disrupts the flow of our passing. He's also quite injury-prone and on high wages. For these reasons I'd suggest he may be a contender for the exit at the end of the season.

I'll have fond memories of Jose. A likeable chap who on his day can be excellent - he has never ever found consistency - and never seems to learn from his mistakes on the pitch - and I have my doubts that he ever will - barring some kind of sudden left-backist epiphany (and I'm not sure if those exist).

Strangely. Having said all that - I haven't written him off completely.

I'm curious as to how he'd perform with the wing-backs set-up we are now using. If he gets a chance to shine and seizes it - I'd love to see him succeed, and you never know, perhaps he will surprise us all? Perhaps the new system would suit his attacking style more?

Enrique has the talent - and if he can stay fit, he has impressive physical power.

If he can tussle for a spot with Moreno, perhaps it could bring the best out of them both.

It will be a big 2nd half of the season for Enrique. As well as facing Moreno for the starting berth - Youngsters such as Flanagan and Brad Smith will be staking their claim for a spot in future. Flanagan has performed well there if required and Smith is clearly a talented youngster to those who have seen him.

Keep in mind that we don't have have vast fortunes to spend on new left-backs either. We have to keep an eye on our finances and already have an expensive option in Moreno.

So long as he knew he wasn't a guaranteed starter and was prepared to fight for a place - Enrique could yet prove useful.

If he's given the chance - I'll be watching his performances at wing-back with interest. The rest is all up to him.

Do or die time for Jose. Good luck to him.

Agree12 Disagree3

I reckon we still have Enrique because he cracks all the squad up with his total lack of self awareness.
In interviews the players are always giving him stick for everything!

Agree0 Disagree0

Enrique is aweful.

Agree0 Disagree3

Enrique and Allen have been here for way too long

Agree0 Disagree2

Sorry zinedine
I realised you were off your head when you mentioned Borini and Allen.
Both are clearly below average and I fail to understand how anyone can have a different assessment of both when the evidence is there.

Agree0 Disagree2

Most I agree with though lovren is still young and showed last year he's a good player. Balo played for city and scored about 12 goals when they won the league?

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 21:52:16
Well done Sammy Lee for contributing to the consistent and well organised Southampton team.

An experienced, ex red, scouser with bags of experience.

Makes you think.

Believable3 Unbelievable7

He was coaching the first team under Dalglish (2nd spell). So was Kevin Keen who is well thought of

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 19:05:49
well done to ranaldo on winning the balon d'or, its a pity we never got him when he issued a come and get me to us, that's when we had some pull

Believable1 Unbelievable1

Forget that, how did the two Brazilians make the team?

Agree4 Disagree0

No! that's when he was a nobody.

Agree0 Disagree3

12 Jan 2015 20:01:07
What do you mean, that could be Raheem Sterling in 4 or 5 years time ?

Agree1 Disagree2

If it is Sterling I hope it comes without the spoilt child whining face and total lack of humility. He might be a great player but wouldn't you love to give a good slap ;-)

Agree8 Disagree3

12 Jan 2015 22:33:02
Ronaldo is anything but a spoiled child, and has quite considerable humility, perhaps slightly arrogant. I believe you are confusing him with Lionel Messi who is far more arrogant and child like.

Agree6 Disagree5

And well done to Borini, Lambert and Mario for jointly winning the Barn'Dor.

Agree12 Disagree0

To be fair, Ronaldo(who I don't like) worked so damn hard to get where he is today, so fair play to the guy. He has my respect for that.

Agree6 Disagree0

When I saw the post by piledriver, I thought to myself.

Is that marketing gimmick on legs called David Luiz in the team of the year??

Never. then I saw it.

I've stopped taking this celebrity footballers crap seriously now. If you ever wanted some evidence that pundits and players are pretty clueless - here it is.

What a joke.

Between Gerrard being in the PFA team of the year last year, and Giggs being voted PFA player of the year in 2009, I always thought the English game was rampant with establishment arse-lickers who don't have a clue.

Messi as player of the tournament at the WC for turning in average performances - and now this.

We can now see that the international game - and not just the players and press in England - is full of mindless drones with exceedingly low IQs.

He's on the cover of FIFA, he must be good. eh.

Here is a true story btw. This happened just a minute ago.

I just mentioned to the wife: "the FIFA team of the year was announced today".

"Is Luis in it?" she asked.

"Yep". I said.

#pause - "David Luiz".

She burst out laughing.

Before the Brazil-Germany match in the World Cup I said to the wife - "watch this muppet, I swear he's one of the worst centre-backs I've ever seen, but he has big hair, the world cup is in Brazil and has a great knack for finding TV cameras so he can point to the heavens - so he's a star".

I had to endure a Luiz montage and lots of brainless establishment ex-pro's blandly saying that he was a top-top player before the match kicked off.

"Ignore them. they don't have a clue, just watch Luiz, I implored".

90 minutes later - the wife had stated that yes, this guy Luis was awfully bad.

Now, these same people at the BBC were jumping on the bandwagon, as the reality bus crapped all over them.

"He looks pretty poor defensively" one of the BBC brain trust said, after watching arguably the worst individual defensive display by a player in the history of the tournament.

Unable to listen any more. I switched to Irish TV, renowned for a no-nonsense approach to punditry that does not like bland fence-sitters.

Contrast the BBC with RTE commenting on Luiz.

Eamon Dunphy was asked:

"What do you think of Davis Luiz?".

"He's a clown". Laughed Dunphy.

"Didn't we say so before the match".

I guess Irish people have less tolerance for BS. lol. Proper order.

Anyway. Back to the point.

What a joke the FIFA team of the year has become. David f****** Luiz.

Why not Martin Skrtel? He's as average as anything. Even he's better than Luiz! Vincent Kompany or Cahill are the obvious real candidates too. Zabaleta had a great season.

The likes of Luis Felipe, Godin and Juan Fran were key to worthy title-winners at Athletico Madrid.

Barzagli, Bonucci or Chiellini at CD and Asamoah at LB at Juve are all very impressive players who walked Serie A. Good to see a strong Juve side in Europe - they look better than they have in years. Not a fancy haircut amongst them though unfortunately.

In Germany whilst the likes of Hummels and Dante both had good seasons, and compared with the disaster area that is Luiz, they are clearly reliable defenders. David Alaba of Bayern is simply a Rolls-Royce of a player and the most talented LB I have seen since Maldini and then Roberto Carlos.

Just a few obvious suggestions. Many others will have their own no doubt.

ps: I do not always manage to get my wife (of many years) to watch a defender purely to see just how bad he was. I don't make a regular habit of it - I have only done so one other time -and that was to watch Djimi Traore btw - which says something!

(and yes. Djimi was remarkably awful that day too.)

Agree15 Disagree3

No FORNAX I wasn't at all.

Agree0 Disagree0

Didn't we scout Ronaldo at the same time we scouted Sinama-Pongolle and Anthony LeTallec?

Agree1 Disagree0

Ronaldo might act like a petulant child atimes BUT he is a role model and a perfect example for young kids that talent is NOT everything. If you don`t work hard and and are not ready to sweat and don`t have the hunger and determination to be great, you simply WON`T be because talent alone will NOT get you to his level. I respect him for wanting to leave Utd and go to Spain and challenge himself as well as prove to himself and the world that he can be dominant in any league he plays in (Portugal, England and now Spain) which he has proven just like legends like Van Nistelroy (dominant in England and Spain), Brazilian Ronaldo (Was top scorer in Brazil, Holland, twice in Spain, and Italy), Zidane (dominant in France, Italy and Spain). I will always respect him for that more than Messi who seems just content w/ playing his backyard and is not willing to challenge himself. IMO, I will never consider you who only plays in your backyard to be the best over someone who not only plays well in his neighborhood BUT has the ability to got to other neighborhoods and kick butt.

Agree1 Disagree5

I was also in complete shock when i saw Luiz in the FIFA XI. I know PSG paid a ton of money for him, but that doesn't mean he's any good.

Also, i agree with what you said about celebrity footballers getting all the attention. I work with this guy who is almost completely blind, and one day he said to me, "How did Messi win Player of the Tournament? He wasnt even the best player in his team."

Agree2 Disagree0

You know there are other teams that scouted Ronaldo before Man Utd, I don't hear anyone else moping about.
We haven't done too badly ion scouting terms. Yesil, Suso,Sterling Ibe, Ojo. Most teams wish they had our young stars. Its a pity we wish we had their coaches to bring up these youngsters, but such is life I guess. Please stop moping about spilt milk, worry about BR and the talent he is killing right now at LFC.

YNWA

Agree1 Disagree0

Made my morning that Ozone. Brilliant.

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jan 2015 07:55:59
the Barn'Dor . very good

Hats off you, Ozone. Post of the week.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 18:25:39
Hey eds.
Can u tell what happened to mclaughlin?was being talked up as d nxt big thing 2 yrs ago.
I heard that he had some niggling injury issues. but did his developmnt stall or something?
thanks again!

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - he picked up a few niggles, yes, while on loan, and it seems to have held him back badly. He struggled to establish himself because of it. He needs to get a good run of games, which will mean a loan again as he is not going to get a chance for the first team. This time we need to pick the loan more carefully, as it needs to be one he can be looked after to keep an eye on those injuries.}

12 Jan 2015 15:47:22
Good Morning from Miami Ed's 001. I just wanted your omniscient opinion on the 'The three Stooges' Rodgers, Marsh and Pascoe. Your feelings regarding Brenda are well documented but I'd like to know what you think of the other two Marsh and Pascoe in terms of ability, effectiveness and job remit? They seem like impotent yes men to me but I stand corrected if I'm wrong. I feel that great coaches equate to winning more football matches and with the talented squad we have with better coaching staff we'd be further up the table. Thanks in advance if you get round to answering my question.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I am not convinced by Pascoe, he doesn't seem to bring anything to the table as an assistant. Though I do think he is a very good coach. It is just that he seems too much of a yes man in terms of management.

I am unsure what exactly it is Marsh does, being honest. It seems like he is there as a token ex-player, though I am sure that is being unfair on him. I just can't quite figure out what has changed, for better or worse, since his involvement in the first team scene.}

Thank's eds 01. If we were going to have a token ex player on the coaching staff I would prefer it to be Hyppia at least he would sort out that keystone kop's defending. How can Brenda be so arrogant not to hire a defensive coach. don't get me started as this post will turn into war and peace!

Agree3 Disagree1

Do we not think its time to get off Brendon's back and let him do his job

Agree6 Disagree9

Na we should carry on, the man can't do his job properly.

Agree7 Disagree2

We've been off his back for around 2 and a half years but when his conceited actions (or inaction's) are affecting team moral, our immediate and distant future and the way our beloved club is perceived financially and emotionally around the world, no I don't think it's time to get off his back. In fact I think we should put him on a donkey and parade him round concert square and show him up for the person he is.

Agree6 Disagree1

He's going be there to end of season so instead of slating him let's get behind him and see where we are at the end of the season I'm not saying I agree with all does but until the owners want a change let's support him

Agree5 Disagree1

But Ed aren't you being a tad naive there. Isn't the role of a number 2 to be the proverbial Yes man.
They wouldn't last if they grew a pair and told the manager what he didn't want to hear

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - no, the role of the number 2 is to be the no man. In times past rulers would employ someone specifically to tell them why they shouldn't take the course of action they thought was right (I believe they are the origin of the word naysayer if I remember correctly). The idea being that you need to have someone telling why you shouldn't, to make you think through the decision before you act on it. Peter Taylor was not a yes man, Bob Paisley was far from a yes man and Ronnie Moran was miles away from a yes man. The best leaders have someone strong alongside them telling them why they shouldn't do something, and sometimes even convincing them not to do it.}

If I agree to your reply eds 001 does that make me a yes man??

Agree5 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - yep....}

Defo think you, and all the others who do it, need to stop calling him 'Brenda' though.

Embarrassing to be honest; not even a good put down.

Agree18 Disagree1

If you surround rourself w/ Yes men, then it means you are a weak leader and cannot stand any kind of opposition which is what BR is., a weak leader.

Agree2 Disagree7

What's wrong with calling him Brenda? I hope you don't think i'm being misogynistic? I'ts internet forum repartee. I bet it's a laugh a minute in your house at xmas Skirtles Staples. Oh to be a bleeding heart liberal staples. I think i'm going to go into an EMS strop and not come on to the site for a couple of days!!

Agree0 Disagree4

Please tell me a good put down staples and i'll use that

Agree0 Disagree1

Excellent 'bantz' on this thread.

I highly recommend it.

Great stuff all round, particularly from SkrtelsStaples & TheBrendansAdvocate.

It's a world of yes-men and bleedin' heart liberals round these parts.

:)

Agree8 Disagree4

{Ed007's Note - That's a yellow card and an official warning for lowering the tone of the site by using 'bantz' in a post. The only thing saving you from a straight 3-day-ban is that you used 'excellent' instead of 'top'.}

Hi Ed007.

I only mean it in a joke sense. Hence the 'italics'. I'm an just old man who is hip and 'down with the kids'.

I like your style though, ed.

You really are a top, top editor.

:)

Agree8 Disagree2

Ilike the nose.

Agree1 Disagree1

12 Jan 2015 15:25:40
{Ed001's Note - We have posted a new article entitled, Is it ever a good idea to give a playing legend the reigns as manager?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

Terrible article.

Agree0 Disagree7

{Ed001's Note - how so? Just saying it is terrible is a complete waste of everyone's time. If you disagree with something and all you can say is that you disagree, then you are better off not bothering to comment at all.}

Looking at it from a strictly written POV.
The writer begins making excuses for Stuart Pearce (I'm guessing the main inspiration for the article) before he even gets close to criticising him. Completely undermines the squad Stuart had at his disposal. Whilst at the same time is more than happy to heap the criticism on Ally Mccoist who IMO had a much much harder task when trying to restructure an entire side.

There wasn't even 1 attempt to make a counter balance as to player/legends making good managers and any reasoning for their success.

I'm all for airing opinions, on sites like this banter site, but if you're writing articles. you should be full assessing both sides.It seemed to me he had his fanboy opinion on Stuart Pearce and pros becoming managers without even giving a second thought to a counter argument.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - knowing who wrote it, I can guarantee that was not his intention, as he doesn't like Pearce at all! Secondly, the articles are not intended to give both sides, why should they? It was an opinion piece, so giving an opinion. I would think it is more likely he was trying to not be too harsh on Pearce due to a personal dislike of the man to be honest. Sometimes people do lean too far the other way trying to be fair when writing.

As for McCoist, he was awful mate. Seriously he had the easiest job, with a massive budget compared to his opposition and the only full time team in the bottom two flights but produced crap. If you don't know that, then you really are commenting from ignorance on that bit of it.}

I suppose it depends on the legend in question.
I think there are mitigating circumstances with Daglish (namely Hillsborough).
Pearce is just a terrible manager in my opinion. As evidenced by his decision to strip Gerrard of the captaincy while he was in "temporary" charge of England.
A great example of how to win friends and alienate people!!
But there are some very good examples of Legends of clubs doing great things as managers.
I would put forward Pep at Barca, Simeone at Athletico and Mancini at Inter as examples of when it can work well.

Agree4 Disagree0

I'm not denying mccoist is a bad coach. But the same excuses that he's levied on pearce, the entrie u21 squad leaving for example could you not use that same excuse for mccoist, he had to start from scratch. I'd also argue that in that time as well, the u21 squad players improved, but he slowly took them backwards in the way they played for me.

This all completely ignore what other legends did in the game.(pep guardiola, cruyff for example), at international level you had gary speed, who improved wales immensley.

To me ED it certainly felt like he went too far the other way if you say he dislikes Pearce.

To me a ''well read'' article isn't about spouting an opinion, we can all do that. as I have done about this article. It's about forming a basis for a way of thinking, in this case, legends make poor managers, looking at cases for and against, weighin up either side, and coming to an informed conclusion.

When reading the article, it feels like the guys simply gone. ''I don't think legends make good managers, he's 3 examples of failures without addressing the opposite argument, and some flimsy evidence to back it up. and here's the conclusion I had in my head before, I even put pen to paper.


I get that it's meant to be inspiring people to write. but if I want to read opinionated articles I'll go to yahoo.com or have a spat with EMS/reohio etc etc on here or something. I would hope that articles deemed worthy of publication by themselves would be based on the merit of their content.

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - if you want to read articles like that, then you need to go somewhere that can afford to employ professionals who have the time to spend days on research. As for what you said, that is just crap, an article can be whatever it wants to be, it doesn't need to give both sides of any argument at all. You will find that every article can only give one viewpoint, no matter how much they pretend otherwise. Hence why you have to step back and read more than one comment on any situation. If you want one person to give you all sides then you are living in a fantasy world. This is one of the things I hate about people, they want everything given to them on a plate! The whole point is someone else should now be putting forward the counter arguments on there, either through an article or in the comments, but people would rather just whine about how it is not good enough, rather than bothering to provide a different viewpoint.}

Apologies, I am being a bit harsh, it is just the idea of the articles is not meant to be the be all and end all. They are meant to be a starting point to stir up conversation to give a side for people to dispute or agree with. They are not meant to give the answers, no one has all the answers, nor should they try to present them in a short article. If we wanted to give all sides to these articles, they would end up being books.

It is just frustrating that all we ever see is people moaning about the opinion given, instead of making the opposing points. Most of the replies to articles just seem to be people saying nothing but giving abuse or saying the view is crap but not presenting any reason for that comment. It seems like it is just pointless bothering really sometimes.}

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 20:15:26
What a superb site this is. Ed001 can be very blunt at times, but has the knowledge and wisdom to recognise when he has been a little harsh. Top man in my books. Your knowledge on matters is so important to most members Ed, we all get frustrated at times and your point is well made.chin up, we are all with you. Continue to speak your mind and encourage members to put forward logical arguments and discussion. I hate moaning and whinging, but i'm an old a***e so have a ready made excuse !

Keep up the great work Ed001 and Ed002 (lovely lady by the way)

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - my missus is always telling me off for being so blunt, I just don't think until afterwards as it is my normal way, I say what I think when sometimes I should stop and think about how to say it. Often gets me into trouble, my daughter tells me I should be a candour (though she keeps spelling it wrong as it is something to do with a book she made me read and the film of it she made me watch). I was overly harsh there out of frustration and I realised it as soon as I hit sent, sadly not before I hit it!}

Well from now on then ed if I read an article I'll reply specifically to that article. do I need to sign up to anything or do I just use my current rumours sign in?

With regards to article writing I'm only going off what I was taught when writing hypothesis etc at A level and Uni. I know getting an imbalance is impossible, I am just of the opinion going to far the other way is worse when not even considering the other side. I guess I'll try and find something to write an article on and test my prowess.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - yes that is an essay mate, this is meant to be an opinion piece to get people to discuss something. No need to sign up, when you do need to register, it will be the same account you use here. Apologies for being so harsh, I am the one who has to filter the responses and they just are so childish and pathetic it irks me. I don't know why people don't just set out why they disagree so it can be discussed, rather than post abuse directed at everyone they disagree with? It is that tendency that has forced us to have to edit everything in advance, as we can't trust people to have a discussion without it descending into abuse. It is quite sad really.}

Don't worry ed001 I'm not sat here in tears. honest :'(

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - that's ok, I need to keep my quota of upset people up for the day. I hadn't reached it, but not I have I can head off to bed happy! ;o)

12 Jan 2015 14:42:36
Ed's is there any interest in Joe Allen from other clubs? I think the guy is blocking an academy player's route to the first team and I feel he needs to be moved on. Seems like a nice guy but hasn't really done the business for us.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - No.}

Thankyou for your swift reply ed's 002.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 15:47:08
We'll keep Joe; good backup player and happy to sit on the bench more times than not.

Agree1 Disagree6

He's blocking a route in to the first team for Rossiter, I'd happily sell as he offers nothing, can't tackle, can't pass more than five yards backwards or sideways and is too lightweight. Really poor signing for £15m.

Agree10 Disagree2

You forgot - he can't score either

Agree5 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 14:02:08
With Lucas looking like he could leave, and Gerrard leaving at the end of the season, people have been saying we are short in midfield, especially defensive midfield. Just a suggestion, but with our large number of right backs, could Flanagan be used in this position when he returns?
He played in this position for the u21s before being called up to the first team to cover right back, and then left back. If memory serves well he did a good job, and with his tackling, positioning, concentration and determination, as well as being a decent passer, I think he could excel in this role if given the chance. Opinions eds and reds?

Believable2 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool are far from short of midfield players right now. I would not see Flanagan being played out of position.}

Being played out of position is part and parcel of Brendan's new grand plan. I can just imagine his thought processes. (Imagine him preparing his bullet points for the press, as in his 'dulcet tones' he eloquently describes his latest master plan to the dazzled public.)

"So I thought. [delay for maximum impact]. Maybe would could try him upfront, ye'know. his workrate. his desire. "

"He could link well with Skrtel there ye'know. Skrtel has played as a striker in the past, ye'know, his power. his desire to winnnnn. [delay] ye'know."

Playing Flanagan at DM almost seems too borderline sane for BR these days.

The only things that BR will dazzle the public with this season are his teeth.

Agree8 Disagree2

12 Jan 2015 12:10:24
With Gerrard leaving us in the summer, how will the club look to replace him? Will we attempt to find a direct replacement or an alternative solution? I believe I remember Ed001 saying we would look to local talent. However, the only local talent I can think of who fits that sort of mould and is first team ready would be Barkley, and I can't see that happening personally. I could be wrong. Anyway, just curious.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

Well i suspect that Free kicks and penalties will go to Coutinho and Sturridge, Corners and the armband will go to Henderson.

Then we have Lallana to replace him in open play. Let's just hope that doesn't mean he get's shoe horned into defensive midfield!

Agree7 Disagree6

Long term mate we have Jordan Rossiter, Jordan Williams and Adam Phillips who should all make it at Premier league level if managed correctly. Phillips in particular could be one to watch if you're looking for somebody simiar to a young Gerrard as Rossiter and Williams are both deeper midfielders.

When Ed001 said local talent he meant somebody from OUR accademy! Phillips may only be 17 but give him a couple of years and we'll hopefullty ave a special player there. In the short term, enjoy watching Lallana develop into a world class attacking midfielder.

Agree7 Disagree2

EMS, are u sure u want Sturridge and Coutinho taking our penalties and free kicks? Neither have ever been dead ball specialists in their careers and when they had a couple of opportunities they sent them right into the crowd. For me, it would be Lallana as first choice and then try out Moreno for free kicks. he has a wicked left foot, and could replicate Bale if given enough practice in training.

Agree4 Disagree1

Indian buzzer lallana.
Lallana should be made more central next season when Gerrards gone.

Agree3 Disagree0

Sturridge always took penalties as a youth player and Coutinho has the technical ability to learn free kicks in my opinion. If all else fails, Can is German ;)

Agree4 Disagree3

Indian buzzer lallana.
Lallana should be made more central next season when Gerrards gone.

Agree1 Disagree0

Sturridge always took penalties as a youth player and Coutinho has the technical ability to learn free kicks in my opinion. If all else fails, Can is German ;)

Agree1 Disagree4

Adam
Lallana is top class, he will never be world class imo. He hasn't the pace to really be the next level but he's a player that's so good with the ball that he will probably play at a high level into his thirties. What happened to your Lambert shirt?

Agree4 Disagree3

I would like to see the diamond come back with henderson dropping to the sturridge role - We know how well it works when we have the players fit - I know Henderson has a great engine but that role needs someone who knows their role and knows what he needs to do - Lucas does it well but after injuries i think he struggles to get around as well as before where as Hendo can do easily - Have henderson deep with coutinho and lallana either side and sterling at the tip and this may bring some stick but if you put balotelli up top with Sturridge he can become a success - We seen glimpses and tottenham in the 1st game together that they can compliment each others strengths quite well - Just a thought anyways

Agree0 Disagree0

I mean 'Gerrard' role

Agree3 Disagree0

Big Al. Iniesta? Modric? Goetze?

Pace isn't everything. Besides, Lallana is pretty quick off the mark and that's all you need to get away from your man and play a pass or shoot.

I never bought a Lambert shirt because sadly, Rodgers has no idea how to use him and seems to think he is a big target man like Lukaku or Carroll.

Agree4 Disagree3

Adam
I'm lallanas biggest fan, the united fans love to mention that for some reason. Jokes aside, he is a top player potentially a great player for Liverpool in the near future but it is far too soon to be mentioning worldclass. That word is used too much in the game. he's my favourite player to watch though it's been a very long time since we had a player that had such good ball control and able to swivel so easily past opposition players.

Agree4 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 14:39:52
Free kicks I'm unsure about as besides Stevie and Lambert (who won't start) can't say I actually remember any of our other players took or score one, did Lallana take them for S'hampton?

As for penalties I would guess couts or lallana, seen both of them take them and put them away (lallana's against boro were both beauties). Would stay well clear of sturridge taking them though, seen him miss 2 of the 3 he has taken and just seems to try blast it with little placement.

Agree3 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 15:51:45
Rossiter and Williams both played in the Capital One cup against Boro and looked well at home. Small sample size and 'only' a Championship opposition but promising

Agree1 Disagree0

EMS, just going to say that of the two penalties Sturridge has taken for us, he's missed both.

Coutinho would probably hit the post more often than not from penalties given that he likes to put it right in the bottom corner. I'd also like to point out that Coutinho's accuracy from shots is also pretty poor.

However, as someone said, Can is German and therefore, should take our penalties. Lallana could take freekicks.

Agree0 Disagree1

Hi EMS.

I loved your 'If all else fails, Can is German' line.

Made me laugh.

Short and sweet. Post of the day imo.

lol. I still think it's funny. :)

Agree7 Disagree4

12 Jan 2015 09:49:58
Don't understand why Rodgers is playing Lucas every game if he's leaving and when Gerrard goes that leaves us with 3
First team centre mids? I know some will disagree but if you play 2 or 3 I think you need 4 in your first team squad, and I don't see any of the young ones being as good as lucas yet, and in my opinion, I'm not sure if Allen can play effectively in a two man centre midfield partnership with hendo if say can was out?

Believable6 Unbelievable1

Allen cannot play effectively in our team, its been shown time and again that he is a weak link, has all the presence of a crisp packet blowing in the wind, can't tackle, can't pass more than five yards backwards or sideways, can't shoot and is knocked off of the ball too easily. Allen should be the one exiting, not Lucas.

Agree8 Disagree3

Allen is to light weight to play in a good side. I'm struggle to see what Allens role is with the side as he isn't great defensively or attacking wise. He's been at the club long enough (despite injuries) but has shown no improvement when playing for us. I cannot remember a single game he's won for us.

Agree6 Disagree1

Agree, lacks the movement or shooting skills of Llalana, the strength of Can, the vision of Coutinho or the engine and assists of Henderson. Keeps things ticking over but not a genuine defensive enforcer, nor a threat going forward.

I think Hendo's suspension and Allen coming in was a major factor last few games of last season, we looked so pedestrian. We should be selling him rather than Lucas every day of the week, we lack an experienced defensive enforcer without Lucas (although Can will probably get there before too long). we lack nothing that can't be easily replaced without Allen.

Agree7 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 09:42:44
Hi Eds,

Can you give me an update on Flanagan is there a time frame as to when he may be back?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - not right now, they have been taking it slow with him due to previous injuries complicating things apparently. Hence why they have not been forthcoming with details, they want to just let the lad heal in his own time, rather than have any pressure on him.}

Cheers eds

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - welcome mate.}

Big miss him.
That's credit to the progress he made last year.

Agree3 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 00:41:45
Hi guys.

I'd also like to point out something to those who look for conspiracy in their transfer rumours!

I was on the official LFC club site 2 weeks ago and there was a page on which to vote for the 'Standard Chartered Player of the Month'.

Hmm, I thought. no-one has played consistently well really. I'll probably vote for Lucas - he's steadied the ship in every game - even though BR doesn't notice and dropped him vs. Man Utd.

So I go to the page to vote for Lucas - only to discover that I can only vote for either Coutinho, Lallana or Sterling.

No Lucas. Just 3 lads who played inconsistently during the month.

I also saw a string of comments at the foot of the page asking the same question - 'where's Lucas?'.

I guess it wouldn't do to have the fans vote for Lucas as player of the month only to sell him for peanuts within weeks, eh?

What do you lot think? I reckon it smells. and not like roses!

Believable22 Unbelievable4

So what about all other players who were not on that list ? are they being sold too?
it was just a poll with options. do you really think people who manage LFC website have a clue about the game or even watch it ? :)

Agree3 Disagree6

Hi akrubbish (nice name).

Can you honestly think of other players that deserved to be on the list in December?

Mignolet? Any of the defenders defenders? - or strikers?

For me, I genuinely felt that Lucas was the player of the month.

As I pointed out, even the 3 options provided barely played, never mind played consistently well enough to deserve an award.

Agreed that the people on the site seem pretty clueless - but it must be galling to a professional to see their work overlooked in such a manner.

My point remains. I still reckon it reeks of smelly turds.

:)

Agree12 Disagree3

Just read this on the LFC website. Says it all really.

"In the 13 games since Lucas returned to the team against Ludogorets Razgrad in late November, Liverpool have lost just one match - and that was against Manchester United at Old Trafford, when the No.21 was not involved.

He has started in every other match during that time and has not been on the losing side - a statistic that Lucas is determined to preserve throughout the remainder of the current campaign."

Is BR really trying to ship him out! But then, he only gave Lucas a game because injuries forced him to, and hadn't even noticed his contributions in the games prior to dropping him vs. Utd.

Rodgers is clueless lads. We've rode our luck against poor sides over this decent run of results and BR is an awful judge of a player.

Just watch - he'll change everything that has worked. Prepare for a tough end to this season - a season where top 4 should have been in the bag, given the awful records of the opposition, and the amount of money spent.

I've said from the start that we'd finish 7th at most - and I stand by it.

Even though admittedly, I said we'd be 7th if Gerrard plays in DM, as I have long seen him as our weak-link - admittedly, the last 2 games have been encouraging however, and if BR continues to follow my advice and never plays SG there again it is possible to finish higher - particularly if Lucas plays at DM.

However, forget all that. I'm convinced that BR will find a way to f**k it all up - I know him well enough by now. He likely has no idea that he has stumbled onto a winner with Lucas instead of Gerrard.

If and when BR does mess this up, it's a disgrace, given the money spent and the awful competition. Not getting out of that CL group was embarrassing too.

I've got to laugh at the baseless optimism displayed by some here.

I've seen us struggle to beat god-awful sides over the past few weeks, including against a L2 side while playing our best XI. I reckon we'll struggle to beat Villa at the weekend too - most likely because BR will find a way to make us struggle.

This will come to pass.

I reckon this will be the worst season since Souness.

Agree15 Disagree2

12 Jan 2015 07:57:12
Zinedine - the Player of the Month options are the players who have won a man of the match award, which is fan voted for on twitter and the website after the match. Lucas didn't win a MotM award and therefore wasnt in line for a player of the month award

Agree4 Disagree0

"if he continues to follow my advice"
That line has made my day ZinedineKilbane.
Brilliant.

Agree7 Disagree0

What a silly system. It still smells.

Lucas was still player of the month - not 3 guys who had one good game.

What a silly Twittered world we now live in.

Thanks for the insight though hjickle.

Agree11 Disagree4

If you're complaining about that, then You have to remember Kolo playing well in that time too.
I don'tremember Lucas playing all that well vs Leicester or Arsenal, he barely registered for me in the Burnley match.

COutinho in that period for me hit one of his most consistent patches of football and linked greatly with Lallana. Both deserving of being up for the vote for me.

Agree3 Disagree4

I know Lucas lacks pace but I have been saying this to my reds pals as well. he has steadied the ship and is very underrated. BR will only realise how much we need him once we sell him.

Agree6 Disagree0

Hi bobatron.

You clearly lack the keen analytical eye for talent which I possess.

You cannot be faulted for that. Seldom few possess my vision.

You're welcome btw JohnnyBarnes89-90.

Glad you appreciated that! :)

Agree10 Disagree2

I agree Bobatron, however you could argue that the stability and balance Lucas provides the team is what allowed others to shine. I have to say, 12 games unbeaten with Lucas in the side is remarkable considering our overall poor form. He must be doing something right even if as you say it is partially coincidence.

Agree4 Disagree4

What Lucas lacks in pace he has in his head as he reads the game really well, he makes the most tackles and interceptions every game. Again, he isn't Mascherano and he isn't Matic, but he is still a good midfielder, if Inter get him for £7m that's daylight robbery as it would cost double or more to get anyone as disciplined and effective. Personally if we must sell someone to get some funds, I'd let Allen go as he offers nothing in my opinion.

Agree7 Disagree0

He's come in and performed well, But I would re iterate, on something you brought up. His return to the side and the good form recently coincided with changing to 3-4-3, playing bottom half teams and dropping Gerrard from the centre. You could argue in the 2 games we faced tough opposition Basel, and Arsenal, we looked very sloppy.

I mean our last few games have been.
Sudnerland, Wimbledon, leicester(a piss poor) swansea, Burnley Arsenal Bournemouth, Utd BaselSunderland Leicester, Stoke.
I don't think he played vs Utd.
There have been a fair few coincidences as pointed out, I guess we will see our progression when we play the liked of the hammer, chelsea etc over the coming weeks.

Like I say I think Coutinho played well in that time, and Lallana and Kolo.

I'm sorry I don't share your enlightened vision Zinedene

Agree0 Disagree5

Kilbane,

i really don't get how you could not rate couthino, for me he's been our best players in the last month, loads on here say he does not score enough, no but he sets up quite a few, do any of you remember the over head pass to sterling for sterling to score, but then the same people who say couths does not score enough then say lucas has been the best, let me ask how many has he scored, how many has he set up, does he pass the ball forward more than 10 times in a game, has he stopped goals with last minute tackles no, has he stopped attacks by taking the ball of players who are running through our midfield, no, what does he do that makes his so much better than couths, lallana or sterling, for me i see the bad things he does, and i do not believe for one second that its because of him our form has become good, has been said its a factor of a lot of other things that have changed, any one who disagree with me please point me in the right direction of what I've missed him do, like the things i have mentioned above, the same thing all def -mids do, i can't wait for Can to replace him then we will see how mediocre he really is, and before the abuse starts its better waiting to see if i'm wrong instead of your rose tinted glasses

Agree2 Disagree8

{Ed001's Note - Lucas always looks to pass forwards first, I swear you have never watched him play with the nonsensical things you post about him.}

Lol. Cheers bobatron.

I half-agree with you about the Basel and Arsenal games - though in those games BR played either Gerrard or Allen alongside Lucas.

It is my view that neither can play alongside Lucas as part of the central 2 in a 3-4-3 (or any variant of 3 at the back with 2 midfield players protecting them) as it is necessary to possess the defensive quality and physicality to compliment the defence.

When Gerrard plays he quite simply disrupts the setup due to his lack of intelligence - occupying the wrong spaces, choosing the wrong passes, failing to provide an outlet for a pass and constantly getting in Lucas' (and the defences) way. Not to mention that defensively he is tactically poor - and virtually a statue at times.

Likewise - Allen lacks the physicality for such a role. Hendo or Can would compliment Lucas perfectly and in the last 2 games Hendo has looked good - but I suspect BR will find a way to f*** it up.

I'll add that with 4 at the back I could find a place for both these players, as imo they still possess useful qualities

I'll add that Lucas did well in these games despite Gerrard - though the British press were as oblivious as ever as to the reasons why we were so poor. Apart from BR, it seems that the press were the last to figure out the obvious.

Admittedly, it would take an essay to list the range of inept decisions and team selections by BR which have dampened my optimism for the future so long as he is manager.

I honestly do not think that BR has noticed any of the points I have made. He is an awful judge of a players abilities.

If Kenny hadn't signed Suarez, I wonder who BR would have signed instead.

I totally agree with you about the easy run of fixtures btw - and your views on the run-in. I also agree that the 3 lads you mention were amongst the better players in December.

Judging by your comments on the site, I suspect that we may agree on a lot tbh. So you may be closer to my enlightened vision than you suspect! :)

Agree11 Disagree1

Exactly ED! Lucas is very good passer and his job is NOT to play defence-splitting passes and why people always slate him for this is quite pathetic.

Agree3 Disagree1

Kilbane, what's with the name mate?
Obviously you're a red, so a little strange to me?

Is there a funny back story or something?

Agree1 Disagree1

Hello, Skrtles staples.

In answer to your question of why I am named ZinedineKilbane:

In the days of my youth I once played a 4 player game of ISS with my mates whilst 'on the beer', as they used to say back then.

We randomly picked a side to try to win the World Cup and got Ireland. Bear in mind that some of my friends were awful at the game, and Ireland were pretty rubbish.

Regardless. We hashed our way to the final where we faced Brazil - back in the day with Ronaldo and all that.

We got outplayed completely - we were battered and barely touched the ball as Brazil had around 40 shots on our goal -

But somehow, we got one corner and forward strode Kevin Kilbane to score the winner. A scabby header it was too. Ugly. But Kilbane will always have a place in my heart.

It was our finest hour, and sparked celebrations long into the night.

Added to this - the real Zizou is one of my favourite players ever. But blue or not - Kilbane has remained a legend in my mind.

Every time I would see Kilbane play - either on TV or in the flesh - I'd always nudge whatever random stranger happened to be watching the game next to me -

"There he goes. " I'd say.

"Zizou".

"What a player".

I've gotten some strange looks down the years. But I would always thought back to that day when he was the king of the world, and smile as if I was there again - if only for a moment.

(More importantly than all that though. I really didn't give it much thought - it just seemed like a name that would do at the time - but the colourful version is better.)

Skrtles staples btw. Great name.

No f***ing around there m8.

lol.

:)

Agree8 Disagree2

I had the original on the SNES I take it the later version you'd have played with Ronaldo removed the bug where you could run down the touchline then at the half way line have a shot and it automatically went in.

Agree1 Disagree0

They were the days bobatron! I had that back in the day too.

International Superstar Soccer - Deluxe!

I go back to Atari 2600!

Proper games - not the muck nowadays.

:)

Agree5 Disagree1

11 Jan 2015 23:41:49
Oh my word, we win one game against a sunderland side that managed to concede 8 against southampton earlier on in the season, we only won by 1 not 6 as some seem to believe, and some people seem to think top 4 is guaranteed.

I have seen it week in week out on the site on both ends of the spectrum:

STOP. OVER. REACTING.

We played well for once, but we didn't finish our chances, which basically means we're at the same point as we were under kenny: easy to play against, awful at defending, atrocious at putting our chances away and clueless and directionless.

Even though we have been unbeaten in 7 games, how satisfied have you been in those games? Scraped past burnley and wimbledon after getting battered and somehow managed to not beat 1 man team arsenal when awful defending let us down again. So far this season we have had what i would call good performances against spurs, united, arsenal, swansea and sunderland- that is literally it. And we lost the united game 3-0. Out of the 30 odd games we have had this year, 5 positive performances. The rest have been unbearable, unacceptable and utterly ludicrous. This is the standard you feel is okay for liverpool, after finishing second and spending 100 million?

Stop kidding yourself and hiding behind statistics, the only reason we are 5 points off fourth is because the standard of football has been utterly dire in england this year, chelsea have been allowed to walk away with the title without a challenge, i haven't even been impressed with city at all, their nearest challengers, given what you expect from them. United have so much more quality going forward they can afford to play badly and still win, west ham, southampton and swansea have played much much better than us and nobody knows if they will drop off to be honest, arsenal have one world class player dragging them through every week, and while spurs are ahead of us i feel they always get lucky and will never get the top four spot. We place all our hopes on one injury prone striker. What a great plan.

So just because we scraped a 1-0 win against
bleeding sunderland does not mean we are nailed on for top four, nor does it mean rodgers should and will keep his job at the end of the season as he has already displayed his true colours as arrogant and a changed man after the success of last season, and it does not mean we are playing well. We couldn't beat burnley and wimbledon and sunderland convincingly and couldn't beat bottom place leicester at all. Players are still out of position, players are still being alienated and some are being played for no reason at all even when they're a liability, our goalkeeper is still awful, the defence still can't play together, and our strikers still aren't good enough. The sunderland game doesn't change this.

Believable11 Unbelievable2

Be a little positive will you.
yea its a bad season and what not .
fact of the matter is if we get 65 points we will be top 4 . meaning we have to win 11 games . now win them dying or win them destroying, i don't care as a fan. everyone is vulnerable this year and everyone is dropping them points.
and this stat matters because two consecutive seasons in the CL gives us a rating index and money to spend. gives us coverage and all the more reason to expand the stadium. and i don't care if we reach to CL being carried by one injured striker, one 20 year old, or a calamity defence. But i sure believe in my team and know they can do it .
yes we are here and there with management issues and the keeper being under pressure but i think we have enough quality in our ranks to get 11 wins out of the next 17 games. and believing is all we can do. so be a bit positive like all those other poster you are writing against.

Agree2 Disagree6

I think it is you who over-react woolbak. No one here said top 4 is guaranteed. People just wondered if it is not so unrealistic that they can keep dreaming about it and the people who replied said it is very unlikely that we will get it.

We are playing much better then earlier this season. Still left to see if this is consistent and if it is enough against the bigger teams.

Agree1 Disagree3

12 Jan 2015 08:00:10
Fully with fonbip here. Good win, continuing a good run of results that has seen us move to a much better position in the table without much input from a number of our top players who are coming back after rests and injuries soon (hopefully). I don't think it'll long term save Rodgers but for this season it's looking like there is much more hope of a decent ending now than there was a month ago

Agree2 Disagree2

After watching the 2nd half against Sunderland I can guarantee that the overriding emotion was frustration and not some rose tinted view that we are now going to win the league.
All I would like to see is a bit of perspective.
I am looking at the league and our ambition at the start of the season must have been top 4.
We can still achieve that. 4pts off.
If Rodgers did say he would have us challenging for the league then that's his problem.
For me I think the owners would be happy with a top 4 finish.

Agree3 Disagree0

12 Jan 2015 12:29:22
jonny- the owners might have been happy with it. Were they not promised something else.

Look at it this way - on your average day, I'd be happy coming home with a chicken casserole for dinner. But if I had been promised a chinese takeaway and come home to it, I'd be livid!

Agree2 Disagree0

I agree hjikle.
If I did not get me chicken and sweetcorn soup there would be murder.
Its like on Footie manager when the board ask what your expectations are for the season.
If they are happy with CL qualification then you don't state that you will win the PL do you?
Maybe it was delusions of grandeur from BR.
Not like him is it:)

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent