Liverpool Banter Archive February 18 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

18 Feb 2014 20:54:55
Man city?? Why make such a stupid tackle goal down and a man gone rather just let them score haha

Believable0 Unbelievable0

18 Feb 2014 20:47:27
Praying that Dimichelis starts for City when we play them. He is AWFUL! How does he start ahead of Lescott?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Posted that before he got sent off

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 20:21:02
Ed001 if your still about.I posted a few mins ago about young Flanno&Aly.Can I have your thoughts please as I forgot to ask you for them.
BarryinLouth

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I like the attitude and desire of both, though I do think they both need to brush up on technique. Flanno's crossing could do with work, especially, in his game. Cissokho just needs all round technique improving, passing, control of the ball and his crossing are all a bit below par. Both have shown a real desire to improve and to play for us. They have also both shown good defensive awareness and workrate. Overall I like both, I would be happy for them to be at the club for the longer term and try and coach improvement into them. Flanno has definitely shown he can be coached.}

Sure our wingers can't even cross ed

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - they do need work too.}

Henderson is a very good crosser of the ball. But obviously when playing in the middle its harder to get in those positions. Also Stevie G as always been a good crosser. Sterling is getting better all the time.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2014 09:56:05
you would think at this level crossing a ball especially for wingers full backs should be easy.most of these players r at academys from they r 7-8.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 20:14:20
As I am on a bit of a rant this evening thought's on young Flanno please.Well for me guy's I could not drop him.He has not put a foot wrong since he got back and them few splinter's he got on the bench has done him the world of good.Yes I know he's not the finished product by a long way but for me he is better than GJ who for me has lost his way.Speaking of full back's who have come on you have to say Aly is doing the job on the other side.He give's 100% every time and that's all you can ask from a player.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Barry he's a highly paid professional sportsman and as such he should be able to play football (which he can't)as well as give 100%!

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 20:14:04
Fellow fans just want a opinion is Sakho fast have not seen him in a sprint yet probably due to skrtel been a player who would rather sit deep just thinking if Sakho and Illori both make it we would be able to play a major highline

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I would say he is one of the faster centre backs in the world. Illori is the fastest at the club, but Sakho is probably second.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 20:08:15
Just a question for everyone on this website, Have you been watching the Champions League for the last few years? In all honesty, I haven't seen a Champions League match in years because Liverpool haven't been playing!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

The last game I watched was final last year. I was gutted for Dortmund, I really was.

Agree0 Disagree0

I always watch champions league football, how can you not!
I'm willing to admit, i'm one of those people that supports any UK club in the champions league as I feel it's good for British football the further our teams progress.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 19:36:46
Hi Ed001&all Red's.I wonder can you help me with this question I've been asking myself for a long time.What exactly happen with Jari Litmanen at Liverpool?I remember when we got him on a free I thought it was a joke but when I found out it was real I was over the moon.Can anyone tell me why it just did not happen for him.
Thank's a million in advance guy's.
BarryinLouth

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - Houllier wanted him to work back more and just didn't like what he brought to the team. Personally I loved Jari, but I can understand Houllier's thinking, even if it is not the way I would have done it.}

I got a feeling it was a clash of some sort.I was gutted when he left.What would you have done Ed001?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - played him. Houllier's system was far too defensive for my liking, bit like Jose now. So boring and negative to watch, it was a real let down after the Evans' era.}

100% behind you Ed.GH time was so hard to watch at time's but to keep a player with Jari's skill on the bench was down right criminal.
Cheer's for that Ed.
BarryinLouth

Agree0 Disagree0

Houllier also gave us some of the best times in recent (ish)years to be a red. Absolute legend

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - not so sure about that. He left us in a right state, he couldn't pick a decent youth player to save his life and we played terrible football. Worst of all, he forced out a true legend, in God, in favour of a whining midget who was nothing but a plague on the club and always looking for a big money move anyway. Sorry, I like Ged as a bloke, he is a Liverpool fan, a likeable enough fella, did some great things but far too many downsides to be a legend.}

He's no bigger than Rafa in terms of status, but a decent fella.

Agree0 Disagree0

3 trophies in 1 season is legendary status for me mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - needs to win the league to be a legend for me.}

Legend and Houllier do not go in the same sentence. I don't often agree with the eds but I'm right behind '01 on this one. Sure, Houllier won a couple of cups but with the players he inherited he should have done a whole lot more. In fact the trophies he won were at the time somewhat devalued by the big clubs. I mean, remember who we beat in the final of the UEFA cup?
But what really got me about him, as the ed pointed out, was the awful, awful, awful drivel he served up as football. Compared to our current manager Houllier is an abomination (in the footballing sense of course). Legend my a***!

Agree0 Disagree0

I thought it was Thompson that pushed Fowler out more, It's what Fowler said on Setanta tv years ago, and Houllier had only just come back from his heart op at the time no? I was only 12 so may be remembering wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - nothing happened at Liverpool during Houllier's time, unless it was because Houllier wanted it to happen. He was very much a dictator.}

Abomination? You obviously weren't in Cardiff or Dortmund because if you were you would not be saying that. Dortmund was one of the greatest footballing moments of my life and in terms of success that season was one of the best in recent times. Football is based on winning trophies and houllier brought us that in abundance. Legend may seem strong for some people, fair doos, but for me he absolutely is. To call him an abomination I find ridiculous

Agree0 Disagree0

P.s remember who we beat in the semi final

Agree0 Disagree0

You are entitled to your opinion Abo. But in my opinion we were a big deal when Houiller took over; a proper big club. We were up there with United. Houiller wasted a fortune - a fortune on the likes of Diouf, Diao, and a pile of French crap, and made the club a laughing stock for the way it played its football; which was always negative from the off - it was only when he took the shackles off the players (usually only after going behind in a game) that they were allowed to show what they could do. So yes, there were spikes such as that FA Cup win - but if I remember right we were played off the park that day. You remember that big day out? When we won the FA Cup. Well, go ask United fans which day they remember. was it the FACup wins; the League Championship wins? The Champions League wins? Perhaps it was those treble wins?. or perhaps still it was the wonderful and entertaining football they played? Houiller had an emerging Stevie Gerrard; Micheal Owen at his absolute peak; Robbie Fowler who was on a par with Alan Shearer; and Big Sam Hyppia at the back as the spine of his team and still couldn't produce any kind of consistency. In fact his football as I have already stated was garbage. My original hypothesis stands; a [footballing] abomination.
Jackzokay

Agree0 Disagree0

PPS Remember the UEFA Cup had - and continues to have, lost its value to the big boys. so no I don't remember and they probably don't either.
At a guess I bet we probably beat their reserve team.
Jackzokay

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 19:18:52
Just some thoughts for you all.

In the past number of years, we have seen the league and FA cup become increasingly devalued by many clubs. It seems to be the mind set of most clubs that the league is far more important. Also that top 4 is seen as a success over winning a trophy.

How I would change things would be simple.

The winners of the League and the FA cup gain automatic qualification to the Champions League. This would reward teams that win silverware and mean you are actually getting champions (in some respect) in the competition.

The runner up in the BPL will get the 3rd place CL spot and the winner of the League cup will get the 4th. The reason I have chose this is because the League cup is played early in the season, so their is still incentive to push on for a higher league place.

In the event a teams wins a FA and the League, the CL spot will go to the 3rd place league team. If the 3rd place league team has won the League cup, it will go down the league further.

The 3rd, 4th and 5th place teams will be rewarded with Europa league place. Obviously, if the 3rd place team is awarded a CL place, then it will be 4th, 5th and 6th.

I think this will have so many possitives to the game. Firstly, the cups have value again. Players will be rested from league games for trophy ones, not the other way around. Also, the things it would do for clubs like Wigan. The revenue would be phenominal for a club like that. It would also mean it isn't the same teams in it each year, this will mean that players are likely to be a little more loyal as qualification for the CL is given to teams with that bit of luck on their side. It will mean people will watch the Europa League more, as you are like to get a few giants in it every year. This will also increase the cash investment of the competition as with more views, comes more expensive sponsors. Teams will get more for competiting in the Europa League as a result. ALSO, it would make the cup games so much more entertaining!

I am aware I am taking things for granted a little, but I think this would be brilliant for football. I wonder if any of the Eds agree?

So lads what are all your thoughts on this? I will explain things in more detail if something seems unclear

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I think that is a better idea than the current system.}

Just to clarify, this post was by myself.

Agree0 Disagree0

Great idea mate

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 20:58:37
Its fairly similar to my idea the other day, although I left the League Cup as it is for the sinple fact that it is inferior to the FA Cup.
I had the top 3 straight into group stage as now. Then the winner of the FA Cup into third qualifying round, like 4th. This way if a Wigan, or someone similar, won the cup then they would still have to win a qualifier, where you can be pitted against some pretty big teams these days.
Would make the FA Cup worth what it is billed to be. If one of the top 3 won the FA Cup then 4th would get Champs League, like now.
Hope you like my idea too.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - What would you do if England dropped to three places in a couple of years?}

How about bringing back the Cup Winners Cup?
League winners = Champions Lesgue
Runners-up = Europa League
F.A. Cup and League Cup = Cup Winners Cup
With variations if the league winners win one of the cups, etc.

Agree0 Disagree0

I do not think the 'smaller' clubs (no offence) will be very benefited by this. With the small squad they have, what if they get to one of the cup finals and lose it? And due to their indulgence in the cups they may have to sacrifice league form and then they'd be fighting for relegation again. I feel if this did come into existence many clubs will still be trying not to get relegated. This new rule would only benefit clubs like Everton, Newcastle, Swansea, us perhaps who can do something in cups while challenging likes of City, Chelsea etc, I do not see it benefiting the others. Sorry

Agree0 Disagree0

When Scotland get their independence they'll not be recognised as a member state and will lose their CL places until FIFA recognise them. We'll have their places and when they see we bring more to the competition than our colleagues in the North we'll permenantly have them. Shame that they've hit the self destruct button. Not to worry though. Their country after all.

Agree0 Disagree0

Worst idea I can imagine.
Number one it would take away one of the main features of what separates champions league teams against others. You could essentially play 7 games and get a champs league spot. whereas you have to play 38 in the elague, which shows a greater squad and tactical strength over time. You could have all the big clubs knock each other out in round 3 and 4 depending on draws and get a championship team in the champions league!

Agree0 Disagree0

KrishnaYNWA

I understand your point, although I have to disagree. The point I was trying to make was to re-value the cup competitions once again and give them something so clubs have a reason to play in them. Teams facing relegation will obvious chose to play weaker teams still. But it means teams that are usually in and around the mid-table truly have a chance of breaking through. Teams facing relegation should be looking to stay in the league anyway, then after that is secure, push for silverware. So I do disagree.

Bobatron
Why should you get a greater prize for finishing 4th than winning a trophy? Silverware is why clubs should be in existence. But the current way of doing things means teams that aren't winning a thing are continually getting the large funding (Arsenal are a good example of this)

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry but champions league for league cup is terrible, up the competitions over too early, if a team like Swansea won it, they would just give up for the rest of the season?

Agree0 Disagree0

Conbicks
Teams like Swansea aren't in the race to give up from to begin with, I don't see your point?

Agree0 Disagree0

Because sgt red as I already said, it's quality shown over a season, not 6-7 matches with possible easy rides. Sunderland could draw league 1 and 2 teams for 4 rounds while the bigger BETTER

Agree0 Disagree0

Eds accidentally clicked send before I completed last one.

Sgt Red.
it's because teams like sunderland could draw league2&1 teams for 4 rounds while the bigger and BETTER clubs knock each other out.The'ere no justice in that. a squad that plays minimum 38 matches and shows true quality against the top 38 teams consistently, deserves the champions league over a team that got a luck and easy ride over the course of 7 or so matches.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bobatron
So you think it is fair teams that win nothing get the greatest rewards? 3rd and 4th place shouldn't be rewarded so greatly. Plus, I think the game would become much more entertaining too.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 18:57:12
What exactly is Mourinho's problem with Liverpool 'having an advantage' by playing fewer games this season?

Isn't the game of football all about advantages and disadvantages, and the management thereof? i.e. a better manager is an advantage; injured players is a disadvantage; having a sugar daddy and billions of rubles of investment is an advantage etc etc.

Would he have us play 10 men in every game to even it out, so that Chelski can win everything?

I don't get his banter sometimes.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

He is trying to create a us and them mentality within his club by picking a fight with anyone feels threatened by.
He might just find its a him against his chairman if he keeps making enemy's at this rate

Agree0 Disagree0

Why doesn't he just lose the European games and swing the odds back in his favour? Simple, Maureen, imagine the advantage Chelsea would have.

Agree0 Disagree0

He's got plenty of history with us stretching back to 2005. He was gutted about being knocked out of the champions league and the manner with which his team got rattled by the Kop.

Basically with Maureen, if he's attacking your club it means he's scared of you. If he's not whining about your club and coming up with paranoid delusions then it means he doesn't rate you.

Just laugh at him and take it as a compliment. He's previously slagged off every decent club he's. been up against. It's rather old and tiresome.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 18:04:01
Hi all,

Not really Liverpool related but a would like some banter on England's World Cup team and if any of our youngsters deserve a place.
Has Raheem done enough to be in the team, sturridge, hendo? I'm Irish but would love to see England do well after all follow them religiously every week. What would your guys and an edds if possible, squad/team be for the
summer?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Gerrard and Sturridge are pretty much givens so long as they are not injured. And I think if Raheem and Hendo continue to play like they have been doing they are certainly in with a very good shout

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2014 00:06:09
Sterling & Hendo will likely be in the squad. (As well as Gerrard & Sturridge obviously)

Sterling has a chance of being first choice if he keeps his form up, but I don't see Hendo starting with Gerrard in a 442, which Hodgson will almost certainly not deviate from.

Flanagan deserves to go on form, he's playing better than Jonno, Smalling and Walker, but I don't want him to go. I want him to be overlooked by England and declare for Ireland instead.

Agree0 Disagree0

Do u guys reckon hodgson will opt for the safe old guard or try putting out a young competitive team, I mean some of England's youngsters are very good and they try so hard for everything, no ball is left unchallenged for, I'm basing most of this on Liverpools youngsters but the likes of the ox and the bluenoses boy are outstanding too, be a real shame too for hodgson too be overly conservative as usual

Agree0 Disagree0

I do not think Flanno will go, Walker is a surety to start, with Johnno covering.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2014 12:26:12
You Irish can keep your paws off Flanagan ;) He's ours! Isn't Ryan McLaughlin enough for you? Unless you want to do a swap deal?

YNWAdam

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 17:47:11
If anyone can't wait for the Champions League tonight and just want to watch any form of football.

There's youth football on Eurosport now, Copenhagen taking on Barcelona in the UEFA Youth League in the last 16, currently half time.
Cheers,

Believable0 Unbelievable0

18 Feb 2014 17:12:05
so today I have read ed07 and juan mata convinced utd still have a chance of top 4, I really can't see us loosing enough points to let them back in must be arsenal they feel they can catch personally in r results the rest of the games a draw at old trafford and a win against spurs at anfield top 4 here we come.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Wouldn't like to write them off but they have to find some winning form and hope Everton, spurs and ourselves have complete meltdowns. Maybe 1 or 2 of us will drop enough points for United to catch up but it's looking unlikely for them now.

Agree0 Disagree0

Never right them them off, they have Alligator blood, always hanging around!

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 14:27:37
Hey Ed, just need to have a little rant about referee's not against Liverpool, nothing biased whatsoever, but just about refereeing in general.

Now I know I mentioned this before but the problem has in fact got worse. Nearly every match now there is a bad refereeing decision. It used to be maybe once a week or sometimes even once a month, but it is a problem which is occurring more often in this season in particular. This season is one of the closest in Premier League history, but it has been marred by controversial decisions. But for some reason, it's not their fault. They have a bad game week in, week out, the odd one maybe be sent to referee in the lower tiers, while others continue to make season-defining errors. However, it never seems to be there fault according to the FA. If a manager/player comes out to complain about their team falling foul of these decisions, they are automatically fined/banned. The referee is given a pat on the head, and maybe the occasional slap on the wrist, but they are never given a reality check. Truth is if a player or manager was to do their job half right week in, week out, they wouldn't be their for long. So what's the difference? I have no idea. Like I said it's just in general. Steve Clarke lost his job over a refereeing decision, which backs up my point that it can change a season hugely. So it just really bugs me the way managers and players pay the price for bad refereeing decisions yet the referee's themselves get away with it.

This is absolutely nothing to do with the Arsenal game on Sunday, because although it was a big factor in knocking us out of the cup, we also missed a lot of chances so we didn't do ourselves any favours. Rant over!
Cheers,

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed023's Note - I just think the referee should give an interview after each game and explain decisions or his role in the game just like managers and players. They're protected too much IMO}

Yes agree refs should come out and explain decisions, but it is the old boys club sort of thing isn't it sticking up for each other with a wall of silence.

Agree0 Disagree0

The refs will never speak after the game. They would get slaughtered. They would end up being hate figures for fans.

Never going to happen.

Agree0 Disagree0

Would have to agree with Mr. T on this one. I can't see an open conversation being anything other than counterproductive. Obviously if the ref thought something was a foul, they would have called it and they're not going to admit anything otherwise.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes agreed Mr T, its not going to happen, what do you mean "would" become hate figures?

Agree0 Disagree0

I recently went on a stag do with the linesman who ruled Suarez off side for the winner against Everton last season - I had this conversation with him.

His response was that they don't get invited to talk when they make a brilliant decision, so why should they when they get it wrong?

Can't argue with that really.

Agree0 Disagree0

How about a ref's league with a panel analysing accuracy and consistency of decisions after matches. The league winners can ref finals and world cups, the losers get demoted to championship and lower.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2014 11:02:08
Ed023, that is really good idea! totally agree with too much protection.

Agree0 Disagree0

The original poster said "if players/managers did their job half right week in week out. "

Add up the number of decisions a ref makes over the course of the season. I think you'll find they get more than half right. I don't think it's a very mature response to criticise the referees. If you can do better then put up or shut up.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Feb 2014 15:17:38
Just a thought but maybe an epetition might help by forcing the fa into doing something whether its video evidence in game. Or retrospective discipline and public. Your thoughts eds and reds

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 13:18:03
Eds,

I've heard a whisper that we have had/continue to have Lars Bender watched. You heard anything on this?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - No.}

18 Feb 2014 11:50:07
We can't drop flanno at right back when Johnson comes back, would anyone like to see Johnson at left back again for a bit?
I know Enrique will be coming back as well and cissokho has been better of late, but I remember Johnson being quite solid there.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Whoever deserves to get picked based on training and attitude, should start.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 11:17:02
a bit more on the holding midfielder role for nxt season, will rodgers go for a dynamic ball playing player mixed with connor cody as I think if we get a decent offer for lucas we will take it, never was a favorite of mine but I hold my hands up that before that injury away to chelsea he was our best CM, I just think that injury has set him bk big time and slowed him up even more, just my take on it, right edd 01 and 02 who realistically would we want?i know it helps if we get into top 4 but let's just assume we get it?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

18 Feb 2014 10:19:19
Interesting to read Mascherano talking about how he left and how he wanted to say farewll and leave on better terms. It's all water under the bridge. He does blame Hodgson and Purslow but it's all in the past and I'm sorry I've mentioned names.
For me, when Barca beat ManU in the final, Mascherano talking to a reporter on tv, sent a message to Liverpool fans that 'this is for you. ', and for me having seen ManU beaten and then Mascherano share his triumph with Liverpool fans took the pain of him leaving away.

He was a good one but I rate Lucas higher than him. It's just my opinion and I'm sure many might disagree.

Thanks to all Eds and keep the faith my fellow Reds.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Yep, completely disagree. Mash everyday

Agree0 Disagree0

TBH Masch is certainly the better player of the two, but there's no reason why we shouldn't support Lucas is there

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 08:10:58
Morning Ed001, Just read a thread from yesterday involving yourself and several posters about finishing 4th, while I agree that finishing 4th 3rd or 2nd won't have me out getting bladdered and dancing on tables, I totally disagree that those finishing positions are irrelevant!

Without finishing in one of those irrelevant positions we wouldn't have had the opportunity to keep FOREVER the European Cup!

Can I ask you Ed001, did you celebrate Istanbul or was winning it tainted because we didn't win the title the season before? I am intrigued to here your reply.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - of course I celebrated, we won a trophy. That is like asking if I had celebrated UEFA Cup wins! Just because I don't agree that a so called Champions League allows in half of Europe, despite only a 3rd of them actually being champions of anything, doesn't mean a win becomes devalued. I don't decide the rules, just abide by them. Does that explain it?}

By and large, though ed, the winners tend to be champions of their respective country. So the cream rises to the top anyway, it could be argued.
But better to be in, than not.
I liked the old format though, it was very exclusive.
And, just as importantly, the old UEFA and CWCups had great prestige too.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 12:21:44
Being just 20 years old this 'old format' was probably before my time. However I've always been of the impression that the Champions league should be for teams that won a trophy the previous year. For lesser leagues who have a lower Uefa ranking they should only be able to submit the domestic league winners (Scotland), but higher ranking countries like England should be able to submit all 3 domestic trophy winning teams. I'd then have the Europa league set up in a similar format, but with the runners up of the competitions earning entry. Or in the cases of countries like Scotland, let in the domestic cup winners. I don't see why a CHAMPIONS league should consist of teams who are not CHAMPIONS. Perhaps I was born in the wrong era! I think It'd add more value to domestic cups though. Less teams would just rest people in cups, prioritising the league.

Just my humble opinion.

YNWAdam

Agree0 Disagree0

There are about 50 separate national leagues under the UEFA umbrella. Even with some seeding / per-qualification, that's more than enough sides to have a proper "champions" league.
UEFA fixed a problem that wasn't a problem IMO, when they altered the old UEFA and CW Cups. They were tremendous competitions.
And all of them were true cup competitions. Knock out ties over two legs, no messing.
You just crossed your fingers you never pulled a Dynamo Tblisi out of the hat!

Agree0 Disagree0

The thing with the current format is that you are guaranteed to have the best teams competing. If we still had the old format, teams like Manchester United would be in the European Cup, even though half the premier league is better than them! Also the new format means that whoever wins the Cup is well and truly the champion of Europe. In the old format you just had to beat a giant in one or two rounds and the rest of the teams you played were teams no one has heard of.

Just compare the teams we played when we won our first 4 to when we won it in 2005. In 1984 we played Dinamo Bucuresti in the semi final.

Agree0 Disagree0

Just call it the European cup again and there wouldn't be an argument whether or not you had to be a champion to participate. Same format just a name change.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Feb 2014 02:58:34
Eds, reports are that Lucas Dignes is unsettled at PSG - what are the chances of him coming to Anfield in the summer.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool has shown no interest in him.}

17 Feb 2014 23:09:00
Hi Eds.

What do you think the future holds for Luis Alberto? Anytime I've seen him play (his few chances in the 1st team & for the U21s) he's always looked pretty impressive to me. I would have him in the squad ahead of Moses, do you think Rodgers is just giving him time to settle into a new country & we'll get to see more of him next season? Cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - he is just being given time, I do expect to see more of him next season, or possibly a loan move to another Prem team, like Borini and Assaidi to help him settle in English football.}

Thanks for the reply, I think a loan would be ideal, even for the 1st half of the season to give him more game time. Too many people are quick to judge young players ie: Henderson, and come to the conclusion that they aren't up to it.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent