Liverpool Banter Archive September 25 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

25 Sep 2014 21:51:18
eds reds just got myself and my son sorted with tickets for the derby, anny rd anyone around there? hope one day people could get together off here, another thing hope the fans get more singing going not just the kop, anny rd with the blue noses alongside we need to give as good as we get!!

Believable2 Unbelievable0

26 Sep 2014 08:16:49
Just sing - don't worry about what others are doing. Chances are it'll quickly catch on if you stick to the classics/easy stuff, but even if it doesn't just do your part

Agree2 Disagree0

Anyone in the annie rd 126? or near ? if so we could start it off together

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 20:50:21
Respected ED's,

Just wanted to know, Is Joe Allen out for the game vs Everton this weekend?

Also, What would the line-up be this weekend in your view?

Your reply is always appreciated.

Cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable7

{Ed002's Note - The Eds don't normally do this but I have decided Joe won't ne playing this weekend. Right mow my choice is Mingo, Manquillo, Toure, Lovren, Enrique, Lucas, Gerrado, Markovic, Lambert0, Balotelli, Sturro.}

Thanks again ED'002.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed I am sure you got confused when writing, so you wrote Toure instead what you actually wanted to write. I don't know what was your real choice but surely not Toure of all our defending options?

Agree0 Disagree2

Toure, Markovic, Lambert and Sturridge won't be starting I think.

Agree0 Disagree0

It will likely be Lovren and Skrtel in defense with Moreno and Manquillo. I would really like to see Gerrard/Lucas and Hendo paired with either Rossiter or Williams in the derby if possible as Gerrard-Lucas combo simply will not work. The two kids being from the academy would know all about a derby's intensity and would be up for it.

Agree0 Disagree5

25 Sep 2014 19:32:37
Anyone know what's going on with the LFC TV channel? Not showing the press conferences or tonights u21 game?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

25 Sep 2014 21:21:46
There's no press box r any of the usual shows either, this stuff needs to get back asap.

Agree0 Disagree0

From what I heard they may not be carrying the U-21 games live anymore. Not real sure though, to be honest.

Agree0 Disagree0

LFC don't promote the under 21's or the under 18's nowhere near enough, every reds fan should be able to watch the younger players, you get bombarded by adverts for merchandise but you have to search the website to find out when they are playing, and there's also so many repeats on the channel it let's it down badly.

Agree2 Disagree0

They are upgrading the channel.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 15:42:32
Eds, Is there any truth that Liverpool FC want Jack Harper and are apparently 'front runners' to acquire him from Real Madrid, and what are your thoughts about this youth player? Thanks.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - No idea, it sounds like idle speculation.}

I'm not sure, after all the money wast- erm spent on young prospects this summer, that we will go after another one so soon.

January will be about getting in 1 or 2 experienced players who are able to perform at the top level

Agree0 Disagree0

I watched him play against basel & he was their brightest spark on the day but Liverpool scouting them atm isn't a shock because we'll play them soon. With Spanish kids & their lack of binding contracts there may well have been a bit of chat but I doubt anything more

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 15:14:43
Hi eds,

Do you think Liverpool will be planning contract talks with Sterling any time soon ? Also do you know of any significant interest in purchasing the naming rights for the stadium.

Many thanks,

Believable1 Unbelievable2

He is already on a long term contract so there is no need for a new one

Agree6 Disagree1

He deserves a bump up in salary.

Coutinho recently came out about wanting a new contract and he's already on a long-term deal. There's a perfect example of who doesn't need a new & improved contract.

Sterling on the other hand deserves to be earning more than he is and I think it is only right to reward his performances with an improved deal for the lad.

Agree5 Disagree5

Why does a teenager need to be paid more than 30k per week sean?

Agree1 Disagree2

JB2, why does his age affect his worth? He is playing better than anyone else in the team and he's earning about a quarter of what Gerrard is earning for stumbling around the place.

Do you want him to get sick and tired of playing with loads of people who are clearly playing worse than him and they are earning double what he is earning, etc. ?

He's probably the lowest paid of our starting players and yet he's the highest performer - I would like him better compensated so his head would be less likely to be turned by more lucrative offers and also because he is worth it, in my opinion he is anyway.

Agree3 Disagree0

26 Sep 2014 08:52:01
I understand your points sterling being young but football has changed his wages and duration matter.on high wages sterling and long contact anyone interested will have to pay suarez kind of money.
on 30k a week they wont,liverpool will tie him up soon don't worry.if we don t pay him big wages some other club will.same goes for sturridge/coutinho will sign a new deal soon.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Sep 2014 09:04:29
There should be a wage cap on players up to the age of 21. Giving a teenager mega money risks their development as they think they've made it.

Agree4 Disagree0

26 Sep 2014 09:12:37
Its all relative, JB2. Drop off the last 2 zeroes if it helps.

Yes, footballers do get paid an obscene amount of money, but we are where we are, and if we have good, but not great, players earning £100k per week, then I think it is fair and reasonable that Sterling, one of our best players and one of the best players in the premiership, should probably be earning more than 1/10 of Shrek's wages.

I re-iterate, the absolute numbers they earn are obscene, but within this imperfect market, we've got to ensure our best are paid fairly relatively to other players in the prem and at our club.

Personally, I would like to see more variable pay in football so its performance based. Maybe upping Sterlings base by a bit but then doubleing or trebling his goal/assist bonuses may get a better result overall than just doubling or trebling his basic pay.

I would also like to see a very high (9 figure?) buy out clause in place, especially if we are tying him to, say, a 5 year contract.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - A "buy out" clause is of no consequence and won't happen. Making a significant increase in his wages will simply push Liverpool in to further financial problems with FFP. Interestingly, it doesn't seem to bother the fans.}

26 Sep 2014 10:29:13
Why Wavertree? sterling plays like a man so he should be paid like a man.the money could go to his head that's true.but sterling is already making millions true sponser deals national team ect ect.we need to protect our assets and have them tied up to long deals on good wages.i understand the eds abt the ffp rules.but its important that we have wealth on the pitch in any case.
Malta

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Sep 2014 11:18:08
Ed002, I'm all for FFP. You're just using this as an opportunity to have a pop at us and make out that we all haven't a clue.

I know you know much more than more but your last comment to Zeddicus is jumping the gun and it's an unnecessary cheap dig at the fans.

For me personally I have posted this summer about trying to sell Agger & Skrtel due to their high wages, Agger's injuries and form, Skrtel's possible market value and me seeing him as being a squad/backup player going forward. I also posted about us needing to sell Coates as he doesn't suit. 3 out with Lovren in would have been my wish (keep Kelly alright too though).

I've given Centre Backs as an example above and I've tried to explain myself. I hope you can take this as a reasonable criticism of your response to Zeddicus.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I did not respond to Zeddicus as an opportunity to have a "pop" at you all nor to "make out" that you "haven't got a clue" - posts like yours demonstrate that very well.

I responded to explain that (1) a "buy out" clause is of absolutely no consequence and won't happen. I struggle to see the problem you have with that. (2) Making a significant increase in his wages will simply push Liverpool in to further financial problems with FFP. I struggle to see what problem you have with that statement either. Certainly the majority of the fans care not for the finances and the problems that club is facing due to their inability to constrain spending.

If I had wanted to ridicule him I would have made some comment on the £100M plus valuation he suggested for Sterling.}

Thirty thousand pounds PER WEEK! Just try and contemplate how much money that is! It takes me a YEAR to earn half of what he earns in a WEEK and I have a family to provide for. He is a 19 year old kid who is good with a ball, how does he "deserve" the money he is on, never mind a pay rise?

It makes me sick, it really does!

Red Rum

Agree1 Disagree1

Just a quick question ed i don't really know what value to put on sterling except that he's english [ usually means clubs pay over the odds for him ] he's young [ added value too ] and that he is quite a player already. what value would you put on him. i am just curious to see what figure other people think . thanks .

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Sep 2014 15:26:11
Bring it on Ed002, I can take your ridicule!

Completely accept your point about FFP. However, based on the reports that are out there at the moment, I have no idea what Liverpool's response will be and how the issue will play out.

I agree that when your income is less than your expenditure, it makes no sense to increase your expenditure even further. However, losing, or disenfranchising, someone who is becoming such a key player for us will only negatively impact our future earning potential.

Considering FFP on a like for like basis (all other things being equal), Johnson leaving at the end of his contract (or indeed in Jan) should allow plenty for increases to Sterling's contract during the next few months.

Sean, thanks for the post!

BTW, re the valuation, I'm sure he's not worth anywhere near that now. However, over the course of a, say, 5 year contract, his worth TO US will be close to that, and imo, any clause that sets a minimum value (regardless of name) should reflect the players worth to the club rather than on the open market.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - It would be unenforceable outside of the UK.}

26 Sep 2014 15:26:34
Ed002, in my opinion you are following up your statement about pushing Liverpool into further financial problems with FFP with "Interstingly, it doesn't seem to bother the fans".

This to me is making out that we (the fans) don't care, the money doesn't matter and FFP doesn't matter.

I don't think you take criticism well and I will continue to try to explain my post in what I see as a reasonable manner.

Your reference to buy out clauses is completely unnecessary. I did not for a second mention anything on this it was just the FFP references I commented on. My reasons for not mentioning this are (1) No buy out clause means you don't have to sell at any price unless it suits you, (2) You have made it clear in the past they are pointless anyway and they are often ignored.

I have no problem with your buy out clauses response and I don't see how you thought I did.

Yes I agree increasing Sterling's wages significantly isn't good for FFP but FFP has to be looked at on a whole, in my opinion. Sterling deserves the increase and as per my OP above I have explained why I think he does.

My 2nd post explains how I would have preferred FFP to have been targeted myself personally. I agree with you that it must be monitored and yes we have overspent are again we did this summer. I don't agree with leaving our best player on probably the lowest wages of any of our starting team.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You don't seem to grasp the concepts of contract, "buy out" clauses, nor contract law. For some reason you have taken to grizzling about me. There is no reason for you to try and explain further - you have dug a big enough hole.)

25 Sep 2014 15:07:16
Just a point about tomorrows poll of the day. Mignolet saved the 1st penalty of the shoot-out from Bamford.
The only poor penalty from Liverpool by Sterling was also saved.
So the poll is not really relevant imo.

Believable4 Unbelievable2

25 Sep 2014 15:29:25
Are we going to run the same poll tomorrow too, Simon? ;-)

I agree with you. I still cannot believe the quality of the penalties taken by both teams on Tuesday. If they weren't in the corner, or indeed curling into the side netting, then they were into the roof of the net!

So many brave penalties, but a couple of favourites were Jordan Williams for having the cojones to be one of the fist 5 on his debut, and Danny Ayala for having the guts to put his pen so high!

Agree8 Disagree0

A bit harsh on migs that poll.

Agree6 Disagree1

Well I meant with the results coming out tomorrow ha ha,
The standard of penalties from both sides were exceptional. The only poor ones were saved and the final one missed. Don't think either keeper could have done much better.
Mignolet got his fingers to a couple but power and accuracy won the day.
Not good for the heart but great entertainment lol.

Agree3 Disagree1

25 Sep 2014 14:34:33
I'm going to stick my neck out here and say that I think Suso WILL sign a new contract and still be with us going forward.

Based on nothing more than a gut feel (although that could also be a rope wrap I had for lunch)

I think I may be the only one here who wants to see him get a run of games ;-)

Believable10 Unbelievable3

You are not the only one. A lot of us wish he would get a run of games.

Agree6 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 14:58:15
When I said I still expect Suso to be with us "going forward", I didn't mean that he wouldn't track back when we were required to defend in games.

Also, it was a ropey wrap, not a rope wrap. I gave up rope wraps many years ago as they knotted up my intestines.

Agree4 Disagree0

How could you be the only one when it's very clear that people on this site are mad about Suso?

Agree6 Disagree0

I don't think he will sign a new contract. He hasn't been treated well by the club and I doubt he is naive enough to sign another contract at LFC.

Rumours are that Milan have already got their man.

Agree2 Disagree7

25 Sep 2014 17:15:30
Sean, it was a sarcastic comment to finish - hence the *wink* - roll on with those damn smilies, Eds!

AG, I know, but as far as I can see, its only been the Mirror that's reported it - hasn't been picked up by any other media. I'm keeping my fingers crossed anyway as I've always liked what Suso can do and, with a successful loan spell under his belt, he deserves to show what he's learnt and whether he can hack it day in day out in the Prem

Agree4 Disagree0

He lacks application, has suspect stamina levels, I imagine that these two things are related.

That's the reason that he will never fulfill his decent, but not great, potential.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 14:30:59
Can't understand how we arw still talking about "Safe Standing"?
Technology has changed but people haven't. Reintroducing it will ultimately lead to complacency.
Did Hillsborough did not teach anyone anything?
It wasn't the only disaster.
Safe standing has no place in Football today imo

Believable11 Unbelievable10

25 Sep 2014 16:43:10
Germany manage it okay.

Agree11 Disagree11

25 Sep 2014 17:52:19
The problem in the 80s wasn't so much the physical terrace itself, but the attitude towards football fans and their safety.

You just need to read the comments on how "packing" was managed in the Hillsborough report to see what I mean. Actually, there's an argument that you don't really need to read the comments, you just need to know that they referred to process of getting the correct numbers of people into each section as "packing" in the first place.

At the risk of being unpopular, I personally do not see attitudes towards crowd safety at football matches or any major event ever getting that disgustingly lax and dismissive again. But I do accept that I may not actually be right about that.

Agree4 Disagree0

I'm sure Hillsbourgh managed it ok until the tragedy as well.
Just because there hasn't been an accident in Germany doesn't mean there won't be one.
Taking away a safety feature only makes it more likely that someone will get hurt and it's not worth the risk at all.
Can't believe there is even a debate about it actually.

Agree5 Disagree1

25 Sep 2014 18:50:21
SR, that's one of the best defences of safe standing I have read. I disagree with you, but still.

I googled some safe standing proposals, and even the 'rail seating' option still runs the risks of pushing from the side.

Regardless of supporting the club that had such a terrible experience in the past, I still do not agree with any sort of standing at the ground.

I wasn't there in 1989, so I can't even begin to imagine what the people like Waro, who were there that day, went through. But watching the horror unfold on TV was enough to confirm that nothing on earth is worth that risk.

Agree5 Disagree1

Well said Mikey, good point well made.

Agree0 Disagree1

25 Sep 2014 21:34:21
@ MIKEY - Hillsborough didn't manage having terraces just fine before 1989. There were two or three near misses in the 80s in that stadium alone. The fact that no one took notice of what went on in the years before because it was 'just' football fans and it didn't matter if they got a bit of a squeezing exemplifies the attitude problem there was.

Honestly, I can't really decide to either actively support or oppose safe standing. But it is definitely a question of attitude rather than of facilities.

Agree0 Disagree0

Is right Zeddicus, for those who just don't get it, try and imagine waiting for your 15 year old nephew to come back to the car after the game and you wait. wait. wait, and then fear the worst thing imaginable might have happened, it had.
I really didn't want to tell that story but I have read some really insensitive posts, mainly the tone of them, I would be surprised if any advocates of "safe" standing would be of the same opinion if they had lost a member of their family or a close friend.
RIP THE 96.
JFT96.

Agree5 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 14:04:40
eds reds I've been reading some of the posts concerning safe standing etc. the kop as it eas, with 26000 on would never be allowed now, i used to stand on there, from being 13yrs old, i have to say most of the time i felt very safe, on the odd occasion i felt worried, the massive games, the pushing and swaying etc. there was at least one area that seemned to have a clear run down the terracing missing the crush barriers, if you got caught in that area that was scary when the push was on. however i think there is an argument for standing in a way that the numbers are kept near enough the same, the barriers right across, as has been shown in safe standing examples. it would still be all ticket. i understand the opposistion to it, but as an example, the game vs ludogrets, most if not all of the kop was standing, so i'm not sure what the difference is? if you get people, particularly kids, standing on seats so they can see, isn't that dangerous? the kop for example could be seated in 10?? and 20? and 30? safestanding? maybe seeing all points of view? i'm not sure to be honest, after I've said all that i think of the 96.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

25 Sep 2014 13:24:15
Exams start tomorrow guys(tauri)
need the wishes guys, they really helped out last time round

Believable7 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - Good luck with them Reet. I am sure we all wish you that.}

25 Sep 2014 13:39:23
Thanks Ed.

Agree0 Disagree0

Good luck kid!

Agree2 Disagree2

25 Sep 2014 14:48:35
Good luck Reet!

Agree2 Disagree0

Good luck Reet mate! I've just finished my test's and you will be glad to know that there all clear. Now all that I have to remind me of that camping trip in Wales is a rash that the doc said can be treated with cream, and should be gone in two weeks all being well.

YNWA

Agree1 Disagree0

Go on Reet good luck lad

Agree1 Disagree0

Thanks all for wishes. I'll do liverpool rumours proud ;-)

Agree1 Disagree0

Good luck mate.

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree0

Take it easy Reet. You'll do fine. I'll wear my lucky pants for you tomorrow.

Agree1 Disagree0

Good luck fellow Ed!

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 13:10:11
Oh and your telling people to engage there brains is the one piece from your post that should be directed at yourself.

Believable30 Unbelievable0

25 Sep 2014 13:05:05
Not one of Harry's, can I ask, where you at Hillsborough? I was, and until you experience going from " just watching " your team in a game to being in fear for your safety and then witnessing what all of us who where there that day witnessed first hand which was akin to a war zone ( NOT T.V. PICTURES ) then you will never be in a mental position to glibly just assume everything would be just fine because times have changed! F**K atmosphere, peoples lives are far far more important. NO TO STANDING.

p.s. And before you say you didn't say that, I know you didn't but if there's any risk at all to peoples lives even if it's miniscule, then you don't do it.

Believable40 Unbelievable0

Spot on Waro lad, same as my post below, what annoyed me as well was his attitude and tone of his post, telling people to get a grip etc.

Agree35 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 14:39:50
I don't think that I have ever agreed more wholeheartedly with one of your posts, Waro.

Agree6 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I find it hard to understand why this debate keeps coming up. No to standing there is no safe standing.}

Didn't know you'd been to a warzone waro

Agree0 Disagree29

25 Sep 2014 15:24:32
Settle down now, Robert

Agree5 Disagree0

Spot on Waro.

Agree0 Disagree0

I understand it's a sore spot but if something is called 'safe' then I don't see the problem but I can obviously see your objections & btw I wasn't even born when it happened but I as you'll certainly appreciate have my own opinions & won't shy away from them because the majority of other Liverpool fans disagree however virtually every other set of supporters around the country & world seem to agree

Agree0 Disagree4

What a stupid post bobatron, no time for jokes or sarcasm, what is wrong with you?

Agree25 Disagree0

Ed01, ................

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Actually it has been me keeping an eye on it all. You are right and a couple should never have gotten through. I am letting this go right now as it is decent, reflective thread and there are no attempts to troll it right now. I'll let run.}

Might want o let your buddy Ozone know that there is no such thing as 'safe standing", Waro.

Ozone has openly admitted he and his chums always stand on the KOP, regardless of what has happened in the past.

Agree1 Disagree1

Not one of harrys, i see you chose not to answer my question, not surprised as i think i know the answer anyway and by the way the tone of your posts still hasn't changed has it, opinions are one thing the way you put them across is another and you have a lot learn.

Agree3 Disagree0

Sorry not one of Harry's but just because someone calls it safe doesn't mean it is, safer maybe, but safe?
Just like the safety pin is safer than a pin, but you can still stab yourself.

Agree2 Disagree0

Ok Ed no probs

Agree0 Disagree0

This is one post from Waro neither I nor anyone else can disagree with.

I remember watching the live updates on TV coming through and that was horrific enough.

I think all of us oldies remember ailment standing in the terraces at some point where we were out of our comfort zone.

Never again means never again. No standing sections can ever be fully safe.

Agree3 Disagree0

Hey Mikey, that's funny mate I thought of the exact same analogy, great minds hey.

Agree0 Disagree0

So you know it's not a joke or sarcasm, I find this particularly horrid when you describe an obvious tradgedy as a warzone.
Waro asks Harry if he was there, as if his opinion doesn't matter if he wasn't there. Well using that same logic, you can't describe something as a warzone if you've never been to one, it completely undermines the danger soldiers put themselves in every single day! If you've never been to a warzone, don't describe something as a warzone! the same rule applies here

Agree0 Disagree0

I'll sit down next time then AG and see if I can see the game through somebody's legs. I'll do the same away from home. Ridiculous swipe. I was merely stipulating how it is.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 12:26:12
Rodgers said he rested sterling against villa because of the champions league etc. Whilst I don't agree with the decision, I understand.

But why would he play sterling, one of our best players, in the capital one cup? for 120 mins? Rodgers said it himself, the premier league is our bread and butter.

Defies logic!

Believable5 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - You are correct - another example where he should think before talking.}

25 Sep 2014 13:03:48
He underestimated villa!

Agree7 Disagree0

Or underestimated how much we need sterling.

Agree5 Disagree0

Or overestimated the strength of our squad

Agree5 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 13:54:41
He really shouldn't make so many estimations ;-)

Agree8 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 14:00:47
Based on current responses, I think we can safely assume that BR definitely didn't get the decision 'spot on'.

Agree3 Disagree0

Or he got it all wrong, again, rule number one, no sas, no goals .

Agree2 Disagree1

25 Sep 2014 00:42:37
My last word on safe standing, the Kop was dangerous but i don't remember the paddock being life threatening, can anyone tell me any stories that differ?
i genuinely would like to know as i never stood in the paddock.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I agree with Alanhuyton.
It's a backward step. I think we, as a club, should be the last club to even consider it.

To put the atmosphere in the crowd ahead of safety is utterly disrespectful to the death of 96 fans at Hillsbrough.

Anyone who went to the home games against Juventus and Chelsea in 2005 champions league knows there is nothing physical preventing the crowd from having the most stirring atmosphere.
It's nothing to do with standing or seating. It's other factors which I don't want to go into but we all know.
Using seating as a reason for a poor atmosphere is a poor excuse IMO.

Agree12 Disagree0

I agree with Ken here. Picture Liverpool beating Utd 2-1 at Anfield! I guess on that day the atmosphere would be electric. Maybe the fans need something to sing about? Maybe all the "locals" shouldn't be put of by the "out of towners" and help create the atmosphere?

Agree3 Disagree1

Safe standing says it all lads. if it's safe do it. Makes me laugh how people still want to get on their high horse. What happened that day was due to an unfit ground, unfit policing & a general lack of intelligence we have now. Does anyone seriously think that if there was safe standing they'd suddenly go back to letting anyone that turned up in? No. Safe standing involves rows of rails with seat to be sold. Heath & safety gone made is one of our favorite phrases get we don't trust that the current set of anal health & safety workers would manage it? Get a grip lads. Were a ser of supporters known for living in the past but seriously climb down & actually engage brain & see that there's absolutely no reason to be against it. Dortmund have far better fans than us in a far less health & safety mad country & they've managed it just fine.

Agree2 Disagree35

Not one of Harry's, if that's your opinion that's your opinion but you need to tone down your comments, "makes me laugh how people still want to get on their high horse", "get a grip lads", "absolutely no reason", (well I can think of 96 reasons for a start, and that's without going into Heysel, Glasgow, Bradford etc etc). If standing is brought back and is "succesful" for a while it only takes a little slip to cause another disaster.
By the way, I will hazard a guess you never lost any family or maybe even a close friend at Hillsborough, I hope I am right, am I ?

Agree25 Disagree1

I like to think I've got principles, and I like to think that I've given my fair share of support to the HJC, but then again, I work hard, enjoy my beloved club and enjoy going to the games (when I can afford it).

My problem is, which has niggled away at me for years is, do I stick to my principles, on the basis that another disaster could actually happen, or that the cost of attending the game and stadia is crippling supporters?

I moan about the ticket prices, I moan about the atmosphere and I moan that enough kids do not attend, so standing makes sense to me.

Legislation will change, it has too now in favour of standing as football for the ordinary fan is just a memory, and I fear that if Liverpool and their supporters stick to their principles then the club will be left behind, and won't go forward.

Moving forward is about learning from mistakes.

Agree2 Disagree2

Another thing, not one of Harrys, does being able to stand make so much difference to your match day experience? as another poster said a great atmosphere can still be had given the right circumstances, maybe if we had have been as succesful in the past 20 years as we were in the 70's and 80's the atmosphere at Anfield would have been better anyway. All in all I think the negatives to standing outweigh any positives and safety should be paramount.

Agree16 Disagree1

Sorry Davey, disagree, one major flaw in your thinking is saying about standing so kids can afford to go, well i tell you what, the last place i would let any kid of mine go is to stand at a match.

Agree8 Disagree0

Alan, standing does make a difference mate, ask the thousands of Liverpool away supporters who do it every away game every second week. Ask the majority of the kop who do it at the back.

It still goes on.

You're spot on in what you're saying, and no-one can disagree with the no argument, but our supporters continue to contradict what we preach.

Harsh but true.

Agree1 Disagree0

Regarding the standing up at matches.
I think the club should be consistent with the policing of the no standing policy
Some European games it seems we can stand for longer periods and other premier league games we are instructed to sit while the entire time we have the away fans standing
Whilst we don't always care too much for some opposition supporters their safety must also be considered
I personally prefer to stand at matches and always do at away games
The last time I felt uncomfortable with this was in Athens in 2007 but this was down to policing and stewarding as it was just chaos with far too many in one area.
I think my point is we need consistency home and away and if there is any doubt over safety then sit we must

Agree1 Disagree0

Davey, it may make a difference, the point i am making is, is it a difference worth the risk? I don't think so mate, by the way I've been to my fair share of away games mate, in the past if i missed 2 or 3 away games a season i would be gutted.

Agree6 Disagree0

This is the problem Alan. We're all grown-ups on here, and we should be able to have this debate, so I respect everyone's opinion.

What is difficult is attempting to type down an alternative opinion to such a sensitive issue, without it coming across as patronising, nasty, insensitive and everything else, and that is something I am not - and especially over this issue.

I always feel uncomfortable talking about this. In fact, I no longer want to discuss this as I feel I'm digging myself a hole to somewhere I don't want to go, and don't want to be seen as an arrogant basket.

In a nutshell I'm back-tracking because all I want is to watch my beloved reds.

Agree0 Disagree0

No problem with your opinionDavey, you put it across in an acceptable way, unlike some ar****le on here.

Agree0 Disagree0

I've got a season ticket in the kop. I was stood on the kop for the last time against Norwich.
I loved and preferred the standing.
But I'm against any standing area at Anfield. I agree wholeheartedly with the 96 reasons why not.
If other clubs choose otherwise, then that's their choice, I've already voiced mine.
The atmosphere has got progressively worse since we sat.
But instead of blaming the position of our body, why don't more fans do what they pay for and support the team by making some noise?
I think it's the make up of the fans that has changed the atmosphere and not the seating.
All clubs are now businesses and want to maximise profit. So they try to attract families who pay the same price as a bunch of lads, but who will buy something from the club shop, a programme and some food inside the ground! Something me n my mates certainly don't do!
To finish, I'd like to commend the 2 lads who managed to provide their clearly differing opinions on an emotive subject without resorting to insults and dismissive remarks in order to prove their points.
Maybe if we all learnt a little of this then it might relieve the eds of their babysitting responsibilities!!

Agree2 Disagree0

25 Sep 2014 00:28:59
Would personally love to see young suso start against everton he came up through the ranks with sterling those boys are the future and are of real quality hope he starts!

Believable13 Unbelievable1

 
Change Consent