Liverpool Banter Archive May 31 2017

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

31 May 2017 22:04:26
Just heard a couple reports that Mohamed Salah is close to finalising a deal to us. Thought I'd pass it on. Not too sure on this one haven't seen much of him bar his Chelsea days. Has great pace but has anyone else watched much of Roma this year? Have a good night guys.

Believable7 Unbelievable6

01 Jun 2017 02:24:56
I don't know how credible these rumours are but Salah has been excellent since he left Chelsea and has been one of the best attacking players in Italy without a doubt.


01 Jun 2017 03:19:10
Good signing if it happens. Solid back up for Mane and can play on the left wing as well, so serving two purposes in all. And for those who think that Salah would simply be a 'shiny new signing' simply because we already have Mane need to get a grip. Chelsea have Pedro and Willian as squad players, Man Utd have Martial and Rashford, City have Sterling and Nolito etc. Remember how we struggled without Mane in the team?
There is no room for error next season. Beefing up the squad with valuable experience and quality is a must and Salah would be a good start, both as a first teamer and a squad player.


01 Jun 2017 08:29:59
he is technically great. My only concern with him is whether he is big enough to handle the premiership?
He is great in space if given though and would help unlock teams that defend deep and in numbers.


01 Jun 2017 09:21:01
@Gareth "He is great in space if given though and would help unlock teams that defend deep and in numbers. "

Isn't this a massive contradiction? Just saying?


01 Jun 2017 09:21:03
Salah has been very good in Italy, yes. So has suso, but there's no guarantee that he'd have been that good had he stayed.
Different league can make a different player.


01 Jun 2017 09:32:04
Cheers for the replies guys.


01 Jun 2017 12:19:59
no not a contradiction. When he is given space he is very creative, but like i said my worry is he won't get that space in premiership?


31 May 2017 21:20:31
Hi Eds,

I was wondering if you could give your opinion on ...............

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Try the European pages.}

31 May 2017 19:14:10
All I want is three players. I'd be delighted with a top class midfielder and right back. Then a promising left back to challenge Milner.
I see no point in paying huge amounts for a centre back and winger that will be probably sitting on the bench.
That's just me. All I want is quaik.

Believable2 Unbelievable12

31 May 2017 20:28:48
IF we sign a centre back he'll be first choice, Lovren is below average and Matip flatters to deceive.


31 May 2017 20:49:28
Quaik is not the answer Al.


31 May 2017 20:59:59
My word, so let's get rid of both of Matip and Lovren and have a new CB pairing for this coming season.

Liverpool are not in a position to make signings left right and centre. Even Klopp knows that.

Can anyone answer who is interested in signing Lovren when he has just signed a new contract likely with an increase in wages and will sit on the bench by signing a replacement for him?

We have Gomez, Klavan, Matip and Lovren. Add one £60m VVD to that at some ridiculous wage a week and Liverpool are sitting pretty. Pretty messed up if you had to ask me.

Ed002, in fact all of the eds, feel sorry for yous.


{Ed025's Note - we become immune after a while max.. :)

31 May 2017 21:18:27
Oh, and let me not forget Sakho who is now earning his full wages at Liverpool while spending his time training at Palace.

Ha ha, if Sakho does not go, I want to see Liverpool fitting in another CB.

I will take my hat off if a new CB arrives, especially VVD.


31 May 2017 21:25:15
My word Max. You are a condescending chap aren't you? Tell me, do you ever post without a reference to an Ed? No one likes an arse licker Max.


31 May 2017 21:32:05
Do you mean that you'd eat your hat Max?
Taking it off isn't such a big deal but I'd like to see you eat it :-)


{Ed025's Note - it would be ok if it was...a pork pie hat brommers.. :)

31 May 2017 21:42:52
*quality.


31 May 2017 22:19:22
Maybe he's talking about taking his hat off in a "full monty" way?


31 May 2017 22:35:29
I actually agree with Al's original post.
3 first team players is a maximum for me, anymore than 3 threatens to disrupt team spirit.

At the end of the day, what will be will be. We can't influence transfers, they happen when they happen, some clubs won't want to sell, some players won't want to come.
No point in getting het up about it, we already have the quality to beat any opponent, we just have to apply ourselves consistently for a full season.


01 Jun 2017 02:27:41
3 players is a good amount but that focus should certainly not be on a RB where we can do with Clyne for at least another season. A CB, LB, CM and a versatile forward should be the priority if Sturridge is sold.


31 May 2017 21:49:44
I love pork. Especially bacon and crackling. Nothing better. I will go to work with that hat on every day.


01 Jun 2017 06:04:23
Real Ag, we cannot do with Clyne for another season. If Mane gets injured, our right hand side will once again go back to be ineffective and easy to defend against. Clyne does not even make up for his attacking ineptitude with consistent solid defensive performances. Just an average run of the mill player who was brought by BR without thorough scouting. I hope the club follows up on the Periera interest as a combo of Mane and Periera on the right hand side will leave the opposition on that side gasping for breath.


01 Jun 2017 06:42:07
Max, we messed up when Klopp bought Klavan and offered Lovren a new contract with a huge salary to go with it.


31 May 2017 18:45:17
I can't believe that Klopp wanted to sign Sessegnon, who is 17, to be an understudy to Milner as a left back. Ridiculous. aren't we going to sign an experienced left back?

Believable4 Unbelievable18

31 May 2017 18:55:33
I'd definitely have him over robertson.


31 May 2017 18:56:55
Klopp did not want to sign Sessegnon as an understudy to Milner. As explained by the Eds, he would have likely been loaned back to Fulham. Fulham do not want to sell to us due to tapping up Dempsey.

Klopp still wants to sign a LB and if he did sign Sessegnon, another LB would have been added anyway as explained by the Eds. Get with the program.

Moan, moan, moan.


31 May 2017 18:57:58
I can't believe that you didn't bother to read the posts. Ridiculous. Aren't you going to even search for what the Eds have said?


31 May 2017 19:00:43
Ed01 has reiterated several times that the plan is to sign an experienced left back and a youngster, Relax were not even in July.


31 May 2017 19:07:47
I can't believe that we're unable to sign him because of the issues with Fulham. The player has the biggest say on where he goes. He's clearly not as much of a Liverpool fan as we were lead to believe!


31 May 2017 19:25:51
Today's Echo is saying that he would have been an understudy to Milner.


31 May 2017 19:28:36
We ain't even in June let alone July!


31 May 2017 19:54:07
HL9, the Echo will make you believe what you want to. They sell in order for you to read the stuff they make available. Just like Anfield Extra. The people delusional enough paying to reading and listening to what their Journos have to say.

How will Sessegnon be an understudy to Milner if he were to be loaned back to Fulham upon signing him? I guess he will be first choice at Spurs and first choice if we had to sign him with another LB being arriving for Liverpool this summer.

Put 1 + 1 together =?

You do not need a calculator.


31 May 2017 20:53:43
How does anyone know that he would have been loaned back to Fulham? Liverpool didn't get to negoiate and Klopp didn't give any indication of what he had planned to do. Pure guesswork by all in my opinion.


31 May 2017 21:40:10
Agree. Total speculation Irish. plus your right, Max is a condescending chap!


31 May 2017 18:11:43
Seen a few people saying we won't be bringing in another striker now we have solanke (unless one of the others leave) . Having never seen him play before I have to ask what kind of striker he is? I read somewhere that he has a good turn of pace, strong, can hold the ball up well and is quite a good finisher similar to. oh I don't know. a young daniel sturridge?
Could he not be sturridges replacement hoping for a very similer but less injury prone player?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

31 May 2017 18:34:27
If Sturridge stays I honestly do not see Solanke getting ahead of him at this point. We still also have Origi and Ings.

No point in hyping young players. Give the lad his space and let the coaches do their job. He probably will get chances. Still just a kid and he also needs to keep his head straight. You work for a place in order to earn it. Nothing is for free.


01 Jun 2017 02:24:26
He's got the right physicality, good movement and a good finisher. Decent in terms of passing and when on the ball but arguably his movement and finishing are his natural strengths.

Fantastic record at junior levels and performed decent enough when on loan at Vitesse, but he's still only 19 and hasn't been given the chances to prove himself at top table so remains to be seen how quickly he can adapt. From what I've seen he could be a surprise package if he gets enough playing time.

The way I see this transfer is we have Firmino and Sturridge as our preferred strikers, then Origi who's done OK but struggled at times and Ings who's got to prove his recovery. If we lose a couple to injury (far from unlikely given Sturridge) then we are extremely thin, but likewise with 4 strikers already we don't need a $50m player if Firmino be Strurridge manage to remain fit, so cover provided by a hungry young striker ready for the next step doesn't seem such a bad idea.

Welcome Dom and hope you get your chance and grab it with both hands!


31 May 2017 16:19:52
So Solanke our first signing, guess that will see no other strikers being signed unless Sturridge is sold.

Now we just need a wide forward for the left side, RB and LB.

That will do for me.

Oh and apparently Henderson has decided to take time to get back to fitness instead of going on holiday. That is the kind of players we require. 100% commitment. Hope to see you back soon Captain!

Believable14 Unbelievable4

31 May 2017 17:11:56
If true. Stuff of class Hendo.


31 May 2017 17:35:01
Max. Ed has already said Solanke arrival has zero affect on another Striker arrivng mate, luan is of interest.


31 May 2017 17:49:23
Unless Sturridge is sold Kloppsreds. That is what I said.

We may still have interest in Luan but if Sturridge stays then one can only assume that Ed002 is right.


31 May 2017 18:02:47
Ok mate. didn't read it correct tbh. We have to bring another Striker in surely to god.


31 May 2017 18:11:42
Ed002 did say recently, Liverpool can make two signing but more will be dependent on others leaving first. Our squad is overloaded, the wage bill too.

Signing Luan is going to cost the club an awful amount especially when it comes to his ownership situation i. e. Markovic. We may be better off sticking with Sturridge.


31 May 2017 21:43:37
you mean it is better not to have another option.? Because history has clearly shown us that Sturridge cannot be relied on. Whether Sturridge stays or goes, we need to add another proven option up front.


31 May 2017 23:42:59
Sturridge, Firmino, Ings, Origi and Solanke. and you want more? Literally how many do you want haha!


01 Jun 2017 02:26:26
We shouldn't be getting anyone else in unless it's a proven option and replacement for Sturridge IMO (like a Lacazette) - five strikers is enough and any more just proves fitness is the concern so the one to replace is the one with fitness problems.


01 Jun 2017 02:29:20
I think there is every chance Sturridge will be sold and we will look for another forward.


31 May 2017 16:13:11
Ok people, let's get this straight. The transfer window has not opened yet so Salah's agent following Liverpool on twitter and posting a photo of a plain ticket to London, please get a grip.

Klopp said “I wish we can bring in the players tomorrow but of course that isn't really likely. The best scenario is always to have them in before pre-season. ”

Reports have suggest that we offered Clichy and Casillas. Both these rumours have been squashed and Liverpool are likely to be linked with many more 'on the verge of joining" rumours.

I can understand majority become frantic when the next player to be rumoured being on the verge of joining LFC but if you take Goal and Mirror rumours at heart then you are most likely to get frantic about nothing. Believing everything you read. only gets you one thing and that is delusion.

Believable6 Unbelievable1

31 May 2017 15:44:28
ED001, do you and Benny Baller have any plans for a second podcast to discuss the second lot of player reviews?

Also, at a later date, on the podcast, do you think you would be able to discuss possible ins and outs at the club. I would particularly like to get your take on Solanke, who will be playing for our U23's. The reason why I am interested to hear more about him is because, from what I understand, Solanke left Chelsea because he wanted first team commitments, yet according to many people he is happy to join us and play for our U23's this season. Have assurances been made to him, does Klopp even rate him or was this just a cheap signing that was worth a gamble?

Anyway, hope you are well and the sun is shining wherever you are. All the best and I'll keep my fingers crossed for another podcast.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

31 May 2017 21:36:36
As far as I'm aware Solanke had outrageous demands regarding wages and wanted first team commitments on top of that at Chelsea. I'd wager he setttled for getting a bumper pay packet at Liverpool playing for their u23's.


31 May 2017 14:41:54
Hi Eds,

Just wondering if there's any more new on the Quincy Promes front?

Believable0 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - What?}

31 May 2017 17:01:47
He dribbles a lot and likes to play from the back.


31 May 2017 19:49:08
He will need a bib then.


{Ed025's Note - love it mate..

31 May 2017 13:30:32
Hi Eds i remember JK saying at the end of the season that are transfer dealings are virtually all done but some may take till the end of August. I take it from that the club are waiting for the selling clubs to get in there replacements first?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - I am not aware of that.}

31 May 2017 19:08:37
Pretty sure that isn't what was said at all.

Klopp was insinuating that they have addressed the problem/ lacking areas and identified targets, nothing to do with having them all sorted out and ready to go when the window opens.

They just have a list of 1st choice, 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc for every position, like the eds have always said, and will attempt to negotiate and achieve their priorities and have them in place before pre-season. The same as basically every other club.


31 May 2017 20:05:47
Exactly. I'm sure Klopp meant that all the planning for purchases and sales was done and now we'd see how the summer went for execution of the planning. It'd be impossible for Klopp to work on actual sales and purchases during the last one-two months of the season, right smack in the middle of a fierce top four/ Europe qualification battle. And on top of that, you'd probably have that ugly, ugly word "tapping up" making it's appearance too.


31 May 2017 21:13:53
That was my take on it too smallsy.


31 May 2017 08:49:05
Eds I used the search function and didn't see anywhere that you actually dismissed the Salah rumours as a 'red' herring. We're not really interested in him are we? Surely his poor work ethic would be be antithesis of what Klopp looks for?
Thanks v much.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - You will have to point me where I said anything about fih.}

31 May 2017 13:51:03
So a little birdie has just informed me it's likely we are trying to offer a 2 year deal to Gael clichy or how ever you spell it, regardless if this is true, wow we really will have the worst 2 full backs in the world

Mbappe- solanke
Mandy- clichy

What's next?

Van dijk - john O'Shea.

Believable6 Unbelievable8

31 May 2017 14:55:44
* mendy.


31 May 2017 15:08:56
Moan, moan, moan.

Solanke and Mbpape? Where have you got that link from? When was it we were going to sign the beat young striker in Europe? Must have missed that one lol

Get a grip.


31 May 2017 15:44:39
Honestly if we're going for clichy we might as well save whatever money we would spend on him and play Milner at left back for another season. Sorry if it sounds like bashing but it's not.


31 May 2017 16:49:18
Looks like we might go back for Robertson. Another defender that cannot defend in our already piss poor backline. Not sure what's going on but these ambitious targets most fans are assuming the club is after are going to come to nothing.
LB is an area that needs immediate attention. Why look for cheap options in a priority area? There are quality LBs out there with proven pedigree well within our budget so why take the cheapest route? Robertson is just not very good, simple and straight as that. This is not me trashing the player, its just a general observation of a lad that struggles to hold his own in a much lesser pressure environment compared to one at LFC.


{Ed002's Note - You should continue your campoaign of hate against all Liverpool players on Facebook or rent an airplane to tow a banner over the stadium. It is like a joke.}

31 May 2017 17:03:56
Anyone who flies over a banner deserves flogging outside Primark on a Saturday afternoon.

Cringe, just pure cringe.


31 May 2017 18:32:58
Maybe we should wait and see who we sign and how they perform before slating them.


31 May 2017 13:19:36
Ed1. You mentioned on the page that there has been no standout left sided attackers in a post about how we shouldn't buy brandt because it would limit chances to our youth players.

My question is this, Im sure you once said Harry kane also didn't stand out in the youth sides or on loan at Leicester yet is now one of the best strikers in the league and dele alli was only playing league 1 football before he was scoring double figures in the prem from the get go. Do you not think there is a chance on of our youths could do the same as kane as in not really shine until they play in the big leagues.

Sorry for the long and rambling post, Thanks.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - yes they could come in and shine, we will only ever know for sure how good they are when they get a chance.}

31 May 2017 16:04:53
Why do all of our youth players only ever get written off, loaned out and sold without ever getting a chance in the first team? It seems giving young players a chance is one of the many objectives FSG claims to strive for, yet never does anything about.


31 May 2017 19:46:41
They don't get a chance as managers are reluctant to gamble their livelihood on them. As is highly evident with Liverpool "fans" (and other teams) all hell breaks loose when we have a bad result. This results in both manager and players getting extreme criticism. Even now players that haven't even signed for us yet are being hung, drawn and quartered. It's even worse in smaller clubs with emerging managers where as little as a handful of bad results could lead to them losing their job. Personally this is one of the core issues effecting English youth development and also British professional coaching. Only 8 teams out 20 had British managers in the premier league last year and that same trait is now creeping into the championship with only one of the three promoted being British.


31 May 2017 21:19:47
Well he gave a chance to a young keeper and as soon as he made a couple of mistakes fans and rent a managers alike jumped on his back and forced the manager to take him out the firing line. The fans are just as big an issue in this as the club and manager.


{Ed025's Note - the fans never forced klopp into anything IAC, it was the ineptitude of karius that forced him to act mate, but i do agree that the fans can be very fickle..

31 May 2017 12:10:02
Hi eds

The targets we are after this summer, are they all 100% Klopp picks? Does he have the full say on who comes and goes or do upstairs still put their straws in the punch?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - no manager ever picks all the players any more.}

31 May 2017 11:52:48
hi Eds. i was wondering if any clubs have expressed an interest in Peplin Ljinders over the past few years? he is a highly rated coach and will inevitably go into management. i am just curious if any clubs have approached us or him about becoming their head coach or manager?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - yes we have been approached a few times regarding him. No head coach roles that I am aware of though yet.}

31 May 2017 15:28:34
cheers ed, from what i have read about him and the way he speaks about the game, he seems like he could have a bright future in coaching.


31 May 2017 15:58:48
Somebody I know was at a meal with him and a few other academy coaches on Friday and he said Ljinders was a really nice guy and absolutely hilarious. Apparently Ljinders said that after training Klopp is always sitting down at Melwood and smoking for two hours which I was really surprised at.
Ljinders though has a bright future for sure, he's rising through the ranks and I'm a sure he will take over as manager or whatever at a top division side one day.


31 May 2017 13:27:23
Don't pay to much interest in assists. Yer only gerting an assist if the player ahead puts it away.

Believable2 Unbelievable2

31 May 2017 14:44:04
Don't pay any attention to tackles or Defenders in general, it's the goalies job to keep the ball out.


31 May 2017 15:18:06
Don't pay any attention to results when comparing managers. Its the players on the pitch who get the results not the manager (unless a player manager, of course)

Sheesh!


31 May 2017 13:25:19
Hello Ed001 et al., I'm a Chelsea fan, but I've watched a lot of our youth team in the last few years (and I'm mates with a few of them still there, or that have been there) so I thought I'd give you something of a rundown of what to expect from Dominic Solanke.
I've spoken to the guy before briefly, but not much and I don't know how true the paper reports about the behind the scenes fallout with him and Chelsea are. What I can tell you about is his strengths and weaknesses as a player however, which I hope will be fairly useful.
If I was to rate him as a prospect overall, it'd probably be a 7/ 10. I think he'll be a very decent player, but at the same time I think he'll never be a top world class player. In our youth teams, his scoring record was always sensational, but he did benefit massively from two things. Firstly, he had arguably three of our best youth players supplying him in the Youth CL and Youth FA Cup, as well as U18 and U21 level in Jeremie Boga, Charly Musonda and Ruben Loftus-Cheek. The former two created so many chances due to their technical skill being miles above most others in their age group, the latter because he was physically ahead of everyone else. This physical advantage is something Solanke shares, he is very powerful for his age, he's tall without being gangly and he uses his body well. However, he did struggle with asserting himself last season on loan at Vitesse when he was up against more experienced centre backs, who were liable to give him a good shove or kicking early on, and he didn't find space as easily as at youth level.
He's not especially fast, but he has a good turn of pace and his positioning is very good, he knows where to go to get goals. His best attribute in my view is his finishing, by far. He's comfortable on the right and left foot, and good in the air and at youth level has been very clinical. If you give him say three chances in a youth game, I'd wager he'd score at least one of them. He handles pressure well, being a nominated penalty taker for our youth sides and for England's youth outfits and technically his finishes are precise and powerful. Inside the eighteen-yard box, he is deadly. His incredible 2014/ 15 youth season saw him named our Academy POTY, when he scored something like thirty-four goals in thirty six appearances.
Now onto his weaknesses, which I think have held him back and ultimately led to Abraham overtaking him in development terms. Solanke is at times very lazy. By this, I mean he contributes very little to build-up play, struggles to hold up the ball and often his passes do go astray. This was again a main criticism during his Vitesse loan spell, he couldn't play as a sole striker which their system relied upon him doing. To his credit, he has tried to work on these skills, diversifying himself as a wide midfielder and inside forward this season, but he clearly needs a lot more time on it. His first touch is also very erratic, at times brilliant and other times he can't trap a beachball. Solanke also did at times give off the undesirable attitude of 'can't be bothered', and this has probably been his biggest downfall at Chelsea. He's clearly demanded stuff the club weren't willing to provide him and he did refuse a loan spell this season- something which Abraham snapped up gleefully. He isn't one of the hardest working players in training, and several youth team managers have been willing to let that slide because of his goal-scoring ratio, but I could hardly see Jurgen Klopp or Antonio Conte willing to make such compromises. His fitness has also been an issue, with some niggly ankle injuries, and less than desirable commitment to rehabilitation.
So why has Solanke not broken through yet? To an extent, I'll admit it's an issue at Chelsea and more youth prospects should come through, but that's a whole other essay. If you had asked me three seasons ago, I'd have said he'd be a first team rotation player by now. But alas, natural progression has seen Abraham (whom I think has a higher potential anyway) overtake him, but at the same time he seems to have decided he has outgrown youth football. Solanke is clearly very talented, but it'll be interesting to see if your manager can get him to put the ego to one side and start working for the team rather than himself. If I was to predict, I think he'll be a solid premier league fifteen-goals-a-season striker, but not a title-winning centre forward. I do think comparing him and Abraham will be very interesting (especially if the latter gets a PL loan next year) as it could be a case that Tammy turns out to be what Solanke could have been if he'd tried a bit harder.
Hope you've learnt something from this guys, any feedback or questions is appreciated and welcomed.

Believable10 Unbelievable1

31 May 2017 13:35:12
Thanks for the info CFCForever
I can't see him realistically becoming a first team player with us. Just have a feeling he'll end being one of those youngster similiar to K. Stewart, Illori, Markovic etc.
I think it would of been best for him to go make his name with a Championship club or lower level Prem team.


31 May 2017 13:42:21
Thanks for the insight pal!


31 May 2017 13:50:13
That's epic mate, thanks a million. I do hope the change of scenery and Klopp's influence can get the lad training and working hard and we see him get a chance to bang a few in for us sooner rather than later. A natural good finisher is one of the things we actually need.


31 May 2017 14:51:50
Thanks for the feedback. Good signs he's got a decent scoring record at all levels. He's obviously got a lot of work to do as most do at 19. It's whether he'll get a chance to prove himself that makes it a little strange choice to sign him.


31 May 2017 18:06:53
Thanks for your insight mate.


31 May 2017 19:27:48
Cheers lad.

His success or failure will depend on what he's got between his ears. If he listens to people like Sterling listened to - he will fail. If he listens to the likes of Hendo and Lucas he will succeed.
He has potential, he needs to stay humble and work hard.


31 May 2017 21:49:23
Thanks for taking the time to post here CFC.
Can't see Klopp tolerating a lax work ethic, but I'd expect Solanke's aware of that and the things he'll need to do. Often a change of environment helps people re-evaluate themselves; he's young enough to learn.


31 May 2017 11:30:52
I'd be more than happy with Brandt as he's Klopps target but Mo Salah right now is the better player by some way. Double figures last year on goals and assists and almost took Roma to the title in their highest points scoring season to date.

He's come on a lot since Chelsea and would be a great option on the wing. There's no African cup of nations this season and tbh we should be able to manage without 1 or 2 players for a few weeks!

Brandt has plenty of potential but if you want immediate impact, Salah is the better choice.

This is of course if the rumours are even true re Mo Salah.

Believable8 Unbelievable1

31 May 2017 11:37:55
We should just jump straight in with a £100 million offer to Leipzig for Keita, Forsberg and Werner. take it or leave it! 😂😂.


31 May 2017 11:49:48
I would also prefer salah, I think he is far more established and would probably suit our system more. Brandt has high potential but he lacks some attributes I would want on the wing, whereas salah doesnt. Salah is more like mane than brandt is and I feel that is what we need. Only problem is he is a player that will eventually go afcon as well so it causes long term problems. I rate both of them and I would be happy with Brandt as he's klopps first choice but I think for the amount we would pay for him, Salah might be better value for money.


31 May 2017 11:54:20
That would be the dream, Liver_La, but they will leave it, and probably have a little chuckle. Losing three key players is a bit too much - unless they get banned from the CL, which may change things.

As for the Salah vs Brandt debate, I am torn. Salah has the better numbers, Brandt is younger and does not need to go to AfCon. If we seek a starter, then Salah is our guy, but that would mean we are moving Cou to the midfield, which in term would make Keita's transfer a little less plausible - at least in my opinion. Personally, I would keep Cou on the wing, add Keita to the midfield and use Brandt as a rotation option.

What unnerves me with Salah is that he will be a risk, make no mistake in that. He seems to have matured, but whenever I watched him, I noticed that he has a tendency to miss A LOT - including clear cut chances. And in the prem, he would not get so many opportunities. On the other hand, he is versatile and perfect for our interchanging front 3. I think that in away games he will cause the opposition nightmares. I don't recall if I ever watched him against a packed defense though. A quick browse of Roma forums indicates that he tends to get ineffective and lost in such situations, but on the other hand he is surprisingly proficient in scoring with his head, which might be crucial for breaking a deadlock, IF we finally bring in a good crosser on one of the FB positions.

Lastly, some rumours that Fosberg has indeed asked to leave Red Bull, but I don't recall us getting linked with him except a brief period around the turn of the year. If I recall, he is a different type from Salah though, better long shot but lower pace. Much more creative - which might classify him as more of a Coutinho than a Mane type of player. Or am I wrong, haven't really watched him very often?


31 May 2017 13:26:42
Just for reference, Salah really struggled to settle in England according to ED002, which seemed to be the main reason why we sold him.


31 May 2017 13:57:18
I can just see the season implode when Kieta, Salah and Mane head off to the African cup of nations, this season all it took was Mane to go.


31 May 2017 14:18:33
Drigan, I'd say you got Forsberg pretty much right. Wouldn't compare him to Couts, though. He is more of a hard working winger/ midfielder. His absolute strengths are passing/ creating, workrate, pressing/ tactical awareness and smartness. Don't think he's afraid to get stuck in there a bit, but has not really a mean streak. No Mané pace, but not slow either.


31 May 2017 15:41:22
Salah probably struggled to settle because he was playing for Chelsea. How many times have Chelsea bought a top attacking midfielder/ winger and eventually sold him because he wasn't getting any opportunities. Salah would thrive in a team like Liverpool or Tottenham.


{Ed002's Note - No, that is not thereason.}

31 May 2017 20:39:13
In that case we'll lose all width in the side for up to 4 weeks, at the busiest time of the season, every other season. You seem to have to forgot what happened this January.


31 May 2017 11:08:08
Hi eds great job as always. Just wondering if there is any news on how mane injury is progressing. Him coming back fully fit n no recurrence would be better news than any signing to me.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - nothing at the moment no. Sorry.}

31 May 2017 11:28:11
Thanks for the reply.


31 May 2017 10:56:19
Hi Eds,

First time posting.

I think Clichy would be a good signing, and hopefully get Sessegnon as his backup for a season or two. He is only 16/ 17 after all. I never saw Clichy have a bad game and has played at the top level all his life. He would be the ideal mentor for the young lad Sessegnon.

Believable2 Unbelievable7

31 May 2017 11:16:52
Clichy has nightmares against us.


31 May 2017 11:27:33
This is driving me mad! Clichy is no improvement on what we already have so what is the point?!

You say he would be a shrewd signing but I guarantee you'd be on his back if he has a bad game.

We shouldn't be settling for the likes of Clichy.

Not to mention it was that rag, The S*n who have reported it so none of you should be taking notice anyway.


31 May 2017 11:34:39
More to the point the bloke who works for the echo who usually has his nose up someones rear end at liverpool has said we are not interested in him. So relax fellas there will be more where this comes from over the summer. We will know once they are signed.


31 May 2017 11:52:17
Thank god, I would have taken clichy when he moved from arsenal but we should be aiming higher now. All this scraping at the bottom of the barrel stuff has to stop.


31 May 2017 13:39:13
Anyone who thinks Clichy is anywhere near good enough to be our starting LB are deluded. He is just as bad as clyne but on the other side. Doesn't defend well doesn't have great pace or delivery. DO NOT SIGN CLICHY PLEASE!


31 May 2017 10:56:11
I don't get it why jurgen keeps forgetting RBL emil Forsberg and he pushes hard for keita Forsberg was key attacking midfield for them and yes his nature poss is left.

Believable1 Unbelievable4

31 May 2017 11:20:28
Because we don't need anyone in Forsbergs position. Firmino, Coutinho and Lallana all play a similar role for us.


31 May 2017 12:44:24
And Can and Wiji are both pretty comfortable there.


31 May 2017 10:13:45
Just read on Sly that Man Utd are the most valued club in Europe. I remember before the premier league we were bigger or at least on par with them. The chronic miss management of this club over the years has been criminal. Hopefully we are going some way to catching up these days but we have a long way to go.

Believable6 Unbelievable4

31 May 2017 13:55:28
I don't know to what extent this is true, but I also read recently that if you go by certain parametrics (number of twitter followers, number of facebook followers), Liverpool is still the most followed club in the UK. It's probably not a coincidence that LFC is the most televised EPL team, the past 2-3 years. It changes drastically when you take global numbers into consideration, where we fall to 4th or 5th (among EPL teams) . Proof that the past 20 years or so, owners and management have been twiddling their thumbs, while the other teams (ManU, ManC, Chelsea, Arsenal, Spurs) have been busy building a global fan base. Mismanagement is a very mild word for what was done. There are some signs that corrective action is finally being taken (continuing stadium expansions, commercial deals with foreign regional brands etc etc), but it's a very long road ahead. It's a pity that South American football championships are ongoing during the summer, otherwise I'd love for us to have friendlies there and develop a stronger fan base (instead of Australia- a country of only 23 Million people- where we are already the most popular) . For example, Chelsea is the most popular EPL club in Brazil- population 290 Million- and this goes a long way when they're recruiting players.


31 May 2017 09:16:51
Ed001, good morning mate.

Did you ever list the left backs we are looking at?

Plenty of names buzzing about ( Tymon, Robertson, Sessegnon, Mendy, but didn't no if there was any to add to? The last 2 mentioned seem to heading elsewhere also.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I haven't had a chance mate, doubt I will get one now.}

31 May 2017 10:19:43
Ok mate no probs.


31 May 2017 09:15:22
Just my 2 cents on the Clichy debate.

Everyone remember Dani Alves?

He left Barcelona and most teams wouldn't touch him. His wage demands were high, he wasn't known to be great defensively and he was the wrong side of 30. Now look at the season he has just had with Juventus!

Fullbacks are a funny breed. Arguably two of the best in Europe last year were Alves and Lahm who are both really getting.

Believable6 Unbelievable3

31 May 2017 10:13:53
And then there's Phillip Degen, Puzzled.


31 May 2017 11:24:14
Not sure how that's even relevant?

Clichy is a premier league player with a decade of experience at the top level, has won countless trophies, league and cups, is a highly capped French international, and played over 25 games of premier league football last season alone (not bad for a player who's "not good enough") .

How Degen is relevant here I don't know. About as relevant as the singing of Joe Cole on a free transfer 🤔.


31 May 2017 12:46:39
Puzzle - both played next to a 3 man central defense, each containing at least one of the best CB's in their league. Hence they could basically forget defense most of the time and focus on distribution. LFC players don't have that luxury, we can't take the passengers who can't get up and down the field.


31 May 2017 13:50:31
Sounds like you're really clutching at straws there.


31 May 2017 08:58:17
thx for the quick answer ed, i was thinking about woodburn, wilson and ojo who could play there, although i see woodburn more centrally in the future.
i just want those youngesters given some game time with all this talk about squad depth.

Believable1 Unbelievable1

{Ed001's Note - Woodburn is central, Ojo and Wilson can play on the right, but neither really has stood out for me.}

31 May 2017 11:04:55
Woodburn strikes me as someone who'll develop into a Llalana or Coutinho type player - can play wide but at his best sitting just behind the forwards in an attacking mid type role.


31 May 2017 13:34:20
Younes of Ajax? Young and gifted. I think he's 19!


31 May 2017 08:32:34
am i the only one who thinks we shouldn't go for brandt, but for a more experienced one?
I haven't seen enough of bbrandt to judge, looks like a really talented lad, but where would that leave our youngsters? i think we have somebreal talents but such a signing would mean for them they aren't. rated. would really like your opinion on that one ed001 and other posters.

Believable1 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - I haven't seen enough of Brandt to form an opinion but I don't see any genuine standouts on the left wing in the youth sides to be honest. So I can't really see the issue.}

31 May 2017 07:46:31
I don't understand the negativity on here in regards to possibly getting Clichy on a free.
If we cannot get Sessegnon or Mendy which right now are seemingly unlikely, I would be happy with Clichy on a free.
IMO he's better than Robinson and a lot of the other bang average LB that are being linked.
He also would bring a lot of experience and more importantly, winning experience.
I would rather Sessegnon or Mendy but if not attainable I say take CLichy on the free for 2 years.

Believable12 Unbelievable5

31 May 2017 08:02:26
Completely agree on this. Clichy is an experienced LB who has won titles. At 31 he still has a few years left and could really offer us a decent option .
City can afford to go and spend £50m on an new LB, we simply cannot. I think Clichy offers a good option in the short term and could really help to develop a younger LB when they come in, shrewd business if you ask me.


31 May 2017 08:11:03
Nope! The point is, Clichy is no improvement whatsoever on Milner and would probably command a significant sign on fee and high wages. Money that could be spent far better elsewhere.


31 May 2017 08:33:45
I'm confused by this. Part of me thinks it's good to get in an experienced pro who was a good record of winning stuff but another part of me wonders if a 32yo (when season starts) is what we need in the LB position. I'm confused, I suppose if it keeps funds available for other positions.


31 May 2017 08:44:23
Doubt he will be on more than Milners reported wages.


31 May 2017 09:09:25
Chaps we have zero interest in clichy!


31 May 2017 10:52:36
Guys, considering what we have at fullback, i'd even take Sagna.


31 May 2017 07:35:07
Some people on this page puzzle me. If Liverpool were to sign VVD and Keita this week, would the Clichy RUMOUR be such an issue? We are still in May a lot will happen regards ins and outs so patience is the key.

Believable8 Unbelievable2

31 May 2017 13:06:26
The fullback position is our weakest position by far - if the club blows 100mil or whatever the rumoured amount is on VVD and Keita but brings in Clichy for a free then they, in my opinion, have their priorities completely and utterly wrong. Whether we signed VVD and Keita or we didn't the rumoured Clichy transfer remains the same: an addition that doesn't really do much to strengthen our weakest area.


Hull City Season Review

31 May 2017 06:59:25
{Ed's Note - We have posted a new article entitled, Hull City Season Review

Believable2 Unbelievable0

31 May 2017 01:41:06
Eds is Solanke being brought in for depth on the U23s or is he being brought in for the 1st team? Cheers.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - It would need to be the first team.}

31 May 2017 03:15:01
Thanks for the reply. And why is that?


{Ed001's Note - because we are not able to make signings for the youth teams.}

31 May 2017 05:00:52
Personally think it's a smart move assuming we plan on keeping Sturridge - Sturridge and Ings have had a rough couple of seasons so having a young striker that doesn't cost the earth but is good enough that we can potentially rotate or use as a starter should others be injured again is a bonus.


31 May 2017 11:28:24
I agree zimbo and heis also highly rated, its a good move for me.


31 May 2017 07:01:41
I thought because he just signed a pro contract with us it would be ok if he plays in under 23s as we are only banned from signing youth players eds? Cheers.


{Ed002's Note - It would be a lot of money for a reserve.}

31 May 2017 07:26:35
What about the young Croatian we just signed? Was that pre-agreed to be signed when he was 16 or something?


{Ed002's Note - He is not from an English side.}

31 May 2017 00:19:01
Is anyone in the Premier League looking at ..................

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - You are on the wrong page.}

30 May 2017 23:09:18
Eds002 could you please answer me these questions. do you c solanke as a first team squad member? If so who is he replacing in you're opinion? And these salah rumours are rubbish surely. as he plays the same position as mane doesn't he?

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Solanke is a good player but not one Chelsea see as ready for the first team just yet, As you say Salah is a Mane type player.}

31 May 2017 06:34:23
Didn't we struggle without mane?
Would think cover is needed personally. Whether salah is the answer though?


31 May 2017 09:53:07
salah would offer no cover during Afcon, would he?


31 May 2017 10:50:00
Yea cos Salah's going to sign for us as a cover for Mane lol.


31 May 2017 12:31:49
Cheers Ed I thought salah was same position as mane so we can squash that rumour 😉👍cheers.


31 May 2017 14:00:45
Just speculation, but does no think that Mane could make an incredible striker? He would press from the front, have blistering pace and runs the lanes better than anyone else we have at the minute.

If this was considered than Mo Salah would be a great addition on the right.


31 May 2017 00:14:48
Rumour that we've offered a two year deal to Gael Clichy? Anything in this? Surely we would only look at him if we have someone younger (i. e. Sessegnon) waiting to come in?

Believable1 Unbelievable7

 
Change Consent