Liverpool Banter Archive November 09 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

09 Nov 2014 21:19:25
Was Gylfi Siggurdsson an option back in summer? He seems to be a classy player.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - No.}

I saw him as an option to back up coutinho in january of last year as i could see he was simply not used properly by tottenham at all. I was actually shouted down for it.

Hes the kind of classy player that we SHOULD have been buying like coutinho and sturridge beforehand instead of blowing 20m on markovic simply because we had money, should have left those kind of signings for spurs to waste their money on.

Agree4 Disagree0

Seriously?

Agree0 Disagree0

SeroiuslY? Is this not the same Gylfi Sigurdsson who we had virtually signed for us B4 choosing Spurs on the basis of, "Spurs are a bigger club than Liverpool and they will be going places this season"? He can choose to play where he wants BUT don`t disrespect the other club and most especially the manager who put U on the map (BR). He was a failure at Spurs and Swansea is and always will b his level. He should stay right where he is.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he was far from a failure at Spurs and most Spurs fans I know thought it was a mistake to sell him.

Sigurdsson was far from a failure at Spurs. Go check how many times he popped up with match winning goals for his team, u will be surprised. AVB and Sherwood simply did not know how to get the best out of him, he was shunted out on the wings when his best position is as a CAM. Very good from dead ball situations and work rate is also commendable. Swansea got a bargain.

Agree1 Disagree0

He rejected us in a very unprofessional and disrespectful manner for a club that he made very little impact on hence, his being sold to a club even smaller than Spurs and LFC. If he was that good, Spurs would have kept him. We can debate if he should or not have been sold and that is based on opinion alone. I don`t do stats because to me, they can say what you want them to say in order to prove your point. Again, I don`t have a prob w/ players choosing other clubs provided they don`t run their gobs and disrespect us while doing it which is what he did. His mouth got him in trouble and frankly, we have players currently better than him in that position so not bothered. As I said, Swansea is his level and he should be happy playing there.

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - sorry but that is just being petty and bitter. He was sold because the managers they had there did not know how to use him. Baldini, who has shown a complete lack of any clue how to deal with a transfer market, sold him. I really don't care what he said, the fact is that he did not fail at Spurs and to suggest as much just shows ignorance of the situation.}

I don't recall Gylfi rejecting us in an unprofessional manner. What did I miss?

Think he's a good player personally and Spurs were dumb to offload him.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Nov 2014 08:32:47
Siggurdsson was a failure at Spurs because ultimately there was no time at Spurs where he convinced a manager (and he had a couple of try it with) that he deserved a regular starting spot. He did good things and had some impressive performances, but he spent 2 or 3 seasons there and at no time was he generally considered a starter

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - so because a manager that didn't want him to begin with or Dim Sherwood, who has less of a clue about football than my girlfriend, who has never even seen the game being played, didn't choose him regularly, he is a failure? Strange how some people define failing. I would say that scoring important goals as a go to player for managers who were determined to prove they didn't need him to make a point to Baldini shows a certain lack of failure. The fact that they kept turning to him suggests they knew that he would provide when called upon. Not sure how that is failing?}

10 Nov 2014 08:34:06
Also it's worth pointing out that part of the reason he looks so good now is that pretty much every attack in Swansea goes through him, so if Swansea have any good attacking move in a match he's likely to be involved.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - isn't that the sign of his quality then? Sounds like another bizarre reason to insult a player who would walk into our current team right now.}

I guess we will agree to disagree on that. N BTTW, I`m not petty nor bitter. I just can`t stand players disrespecting other clubs just to prove a stupid point. I think Gylfi is an average/decent player nd Swansea is his level. An the fact that he got ofloaded by Spurs shows it. We can debate if it was worth it BUT it is what it is.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed001 is absolutely spot on here. spurs were foolish to sell sigurdsson and he would walk in our starting 11 without any doubt.

Agree0 Disagree0

Only because we`re struggling now. Last year, he would have been a benchwarer.

Agree0 Disagree0

He would have been one of the 1st name on the teamsheet if he was with us last year.

Agree0 Disagree0

In place of who, SMS?

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 21:01:35
Am I on some sort of blacklist?
My posts don't seem to get posted any more. I wouldn't blame you because I can be acerbic and sometimes negative at times but I wouldn't mind knowing if I'm wasting my time or not.
If you're booting me I will understand but I'll be equally disappointed that you're censoring me. Everything I say is heartfelt from a long-suffering season-ticket holding supporter whose mortgage equates to a fraction of what these prima donas get paid a month.
I can talk as much crap as anyone else in the pub but it's always said with a 100% love of Liverpool and over forty years of love for the best Club in the land.
If I have to reign in my opinions to be accepted on this site then we have to part waves. . if I'm wrong (and hopefully I am) and you've just not received my posts. then I will take a step back and a deep breath. I'll even apologize.
Over to you EDs !

Believable3 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - You have sent in one post in weeks. I imagine it went to the Other page.}

09 Nov 2014 20:46:01
Eds fellow reds big well done to my home town team today .Worcester City beat Coventry in fa cup

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Good for them.}

Let's all party!

Agree1 Disagree0

They would beat us

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 22:39:53
They already have! 2-1 15th January 1959 - 3rd Round F.A.Cup.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes Worcester! My dad was born and bred in Worcester. Aside from one of his brothers his entire side of the family still live there. Suprised I haven't seen my cousin banging on about this on a certain social networking site!

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 20:18:51
eds
im not really familiare with this fair play thing but ould you explain please what will happen in jan considering that we won't have any money to buy and the need to sell in order to reduce the debt, can we not sell to buy

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Your expectations for January are rather too high - don't expect a whole bunch of changes. I don't want to be explaining the FFP rules from scratch again right now.}

09 Nov 2014 20:21:59
ok thanks eds

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 20:39:19
i doubt the ffp rules will bother us 2 much as we won't be in the champs league again br will be free to piss more money down the drain

Agree7 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 20:02:51
For any of the EDD'S who are around, will the JOLLY RODGER have any money to spend in January, I might be wrong on this but did he say before the start of the season that this was the last spend we'd do for a while. .

Believable0 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - Right now the issue would be how much more debt the club could carry and how stiff a penalty can the club stomach from fines without selling first?}

After spending so much of money, the club still lacks a world class CDM, GK and a 25-30 goals a season forward. These 3 positions itself would cost around 65-70 million GBP. Hopefully the owners can add around 15-20 million more from their pockets and raise cash from selling players like Balo, Borini, Enrique, Allen, Skrtel, Mignolet etc. With Johnson, Toure, Suso, hopefully Gerrard and Jones likely to leave on freebies in the summer, the club should have a decent pot to spend in the summer irrespective of the position it finishes in. As for January, BR should firste get his recruits playing effective football before getting another penny to spend.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - we don't need world class, we just need ones that fit our way of playing. That is more of an issue than their ability.}

10 Nov 2014 06:38:48
Thanks Ed002.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 19:50:04
I am not player bashing but I would like to get my views on record about the apparent consensus that Henderson is the heir apparent to Stevie G's captaincy.
I really don't think he has the quality to be considered in that role.
I was at yesterday's match and from what I saw he fluffed a shot from a low corner when a better connection would have found the net and when he found himself in attack he panicked and gave the ball away.
I feel that more often than not he is like a rabbit which has been startled by headlights.
We have a tradition of quality captains who could influence a game and unfortunately Hendo is not one of them and nor will he ever be.

Believable5 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Don't rule out Lallana for that role.}

Lallana for me too Ed, now if only the manager would start playing the guy.

Agree6 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 20:40:27
He can't even get in the team right now, Ed!!

Agree2 Disagree1

Henderson lack quality we all knew that just now so does the rest of the team so his weaknesses are over shadowing his strengths drop him for lallana give him a break same gerrard for lucas I ask why not freshing the team up

Agree2 Disagree2

Henderson is not quite reaching the heights of last season but he is still a quality player with tons of energy and work rate. The problem is that, unlike last season, Henderson is the only one pressing with intent - the rest of the team don't seem interested (or more likely have been instructed) in pressing which means he is running around more aimlessly, expending his energy chasing balls he cannot win because the team press is non-existent. Henderson still has a bright future at the club but of course he has areas he can improve from - despite an excellent season his lack of goals and lack of ability to put his laces through the ball was one of his weaknesses last season, its an area he does need to work on. As for captain material? I think it is a possibility but he needs more consistency - good captains turn up almost every single game and perform (Gerrard in his prime a perfect example), he hasn't found that consistency yet.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - at times against Chelsea, Hendo was the only player in the opposition half, pressing the centre backs. It was more than once, so it begs a few questions. Where the hell were the forwards? Why was no one helping him? Why was he so far ahead of the forward line with no support from his team mates? To me we just don't look like a team, there is no teamwork, no working together to win the ball back, no working together to keep the ball when we get it and no one getting into the box. It is not his fault that he gets the ball and there is no one to pass to.}

I agree ed, I think Henderson is still playing well but is suffering as a consequence of the dire performances of the team. As you say we just don't look like a team: no forward line to speak of, lack of work rate off the ball, lack of options in midfield, lack of organisation at the back and we could go on and on. It was noticeable in the Chelsea game that, when trying to play out from the back, that we gave Chelsea possession (and put ourselves into trouble) at least 10 times, maybe more. With that sort of incoherence I don't see how any player is able to perform well. I don't think Henderson has been doing an awful lot wrong, I just think his game suffers when he has nobody else at all backing up his energy and work rate - he can't do it alone but at the moment he is one of only a few players actually putting in a shift. Can honestly say i don't understand why he is still criticised - is it just because he is an easy target? There are plenty on here willing to defend Balotelli despite his horrendous attitude and form but Henderson gets jib and that's ok? Proper weird.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it has always been the same, some people will escape criticism no matter what, while others are picked on constantly. Lucas used to be the one who got it in the neck, now it seems Hendo is the easy target. Balotelli has been appalling, but people are jumping in to defend him because the media is on his back. I can understand that to a point, but they are starting to overlook the fact that he deserves the grief for his performances, that are simply not good enough in any aspect.}

Why do you think the team spirit has disappeared so dramatically ed001?
I think it may have to do with team selections.
Toure deserved to start against Chelsea.
Simple as that.
That's the only feeling in football that I don't miss.
That feeling when you know you have played a blinder and then you don't start the next game.
Part of the reason we played consistently last year was a lack of rotation. i'd say its fairly obvious that the rotation this season has been a negative not a positive.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - there are lots of reasons, poor form, changes in tactics, players not knowing each other, managerial blunders, youth players feeling left out, Agger's treatment, Suarez going, attitude of players like Enrique and Balotelli, plus the players are trying to adapt to a new style of play. They all add up to drag a team down.

When you have players feeling they can play a blinder and still not get picked in the next game, because an underperforming favourite will come back in, it creates low morale.

When you have youth teamers knowing that the club is buying and loaning in players of a similar age rather than give them a chance, then they lose morale too. As do their coaches. Selling and sending out promising defenders on loan while borrowing a player of a similar age, who plays the same position, is particularly demotivating for a youth player.

Then you have Enrique, Johnson and Balotelli, with a couldn't give a monkey's attitude, that is not good for teamwork. The dominant Liverpool sides never had players who didn't care. Paisley, Shankly, Moran etc would have never allowed a player not to care. If there had been a sign that a player couldn't care less, they would have been packing their bags within the hour.}

Can't disagree with any of that Ed.
And I love a row!!
That all sounds rather depressing.
I certainly agree in regard to our young players.
We have a brilliant academy which is actually producing players and we decided against using this system. why?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - because it takes guts to trust in young players with little to no experience. Though why it was thought a good idea to lock them out by bringing in players of a similar age with only a bit more experience, I really don't understand. Just seems the club is being run by people with little to no idea about managing people. Unfortunately, in a football club, the most important thing of all is management of people. In most businesses you can just replace underperformers from the huge pool of available workers. In football, you have long periods of time when replacement is not possible, plus a much smaller pool of talent to choose from and a number of competitors doing the same thing. The best thing to do would be to manage what you have to outperform their own capabilities, rather than just chop and change every few months. It is completely different from most businesses, where you are normally better off just changing the personnel, rather than looking to improve their performance.}

Yes Ed.
Look at Koeman.
Has he spent he whole amount of money which Southampton received in the summer? No.
He has just bought what they needed.
Compare that with us and it looks like we have just pissed ours against a wall.
Bringing in young players when we have them already should be banned.
It makes no sense.
Who analysed our squad at the end of the close season and decided that we needed a rb when we have Wisdom already?
Who decided to spend 20 on Markovic when Ibe is already here?
Strange decisions.
If it was solely Rodgers then his job should be under scrutiny.
A right mess.
I'll have to get me boots on again. If this keeps up. My beer belly is better than Balotelli. That rhymed as well.
I can see that on t-shirts all over the Kop.

Agree0 Disagree0

Im fed up of people giving credit to players for working hard.
That is the least expected of them.
Merely working hard is not good enough at this level. Quality and ability to influence a game is also necessary.

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Nov 2014 11:33:11
On Henderson - he has to have more game intelligence than to "press" on his own.
If no-one else is doing it then keep shape and defend as a Unit - yes we pressed well last year but we are not as a team this year- there is no point pressing alone as you just get played round.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 19:00:22
I find it astonishing that after circa £120m spent over the summer, we bring on Borini and Lambert to try and change the game for us yesterday. .

Believable8 Unbelievable0

09 Nov 2014 20:52:47
All aboard the jolly rodger

Agree6 Disagree0

You're astonished we got two strikers on when we needed goals. Should have kept the Balo goal machine on eh?

Agree1 Disagree1

09 Nov 2014 18:48:39
Hi Ed's,
Not posted for a long time but have been an avid reader. As much as it pains me to say it Mr Rodger's time is up. Regardless of what position he achieved last season the investment which was made thus far has not paid off. It increasingly looks like that we will be unable to make top fourl never mind sustain last years position. The simple facts are that our defence has gotten worse. Now some people will say that we are not too far off fourth but to have a valid arguement for that we would have to have shown an ability to perform like a side worthy of CL positions, sadly we have not bar the Spurs gane. The league position after 11 games is enough to make Mr Rodger's position under threat. Our tactics have been poor to say the least. The fodder he is feeding the press is again unsettling. Perhaps if he does get the sack he could some writing for David Brent in the office. I am a life long fan but to see so called fans abuse the Ed's for giving factual and unbiased responses is the hardest part of reading through the site. I hope Rodgers some how turns it around. I can't see how though. Thanks for all the updates Ed's it is appreciated.

Believable10 Unbelievable1

I said at the start of the season that I would give this team a bit of time to get it right.
I will hold off criticizing too much yet.
I have actually seen some improvements in performance recently.
Very slow progress but progress nonetheless.
I am actually going to say something which not many will agree with.
Liverpool will be in the top four by Christmas and about 8pts off the top of the league.
Cue the disagree's but that's what I think will happen.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 18:28:48
It's fast becoming a toss-up as to which red will be sacked first - Ed Miliband or Brendan Rodgers.

Believable10 Unbelievable1

09 Nov 2014 18:08:51
Well at least we are not the only side struggling, City, Utd, Arsenal, TOT are all just as bad.

We can improve, Chelsea might run away with the league but top 4 is well in our grasp. Very young side and Danny S to come back. .BR is a great young manager and I'm sure he will turn us around :-). . at some point

Believable12 Unbelievable9

Love your positivity. For him to turn it around, he needs to change and recieve assistance in the areas he is weak in (transfers, defence, media, etc) or he will be sacked.

Agree2 Disagree0

We should have used this season as a means to achieve at least a top2 finish by building on last season's performance, considering how poor all the top teams bar Chelsea have been. Instead we seem intent on keepin the likes of Man Utd, Arsenal and Spurs company and making life difficult for ourselves. Huge opportunity missed imo.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Nov 2014 08:43:21
Big difference between us and United is they have the potential this season to do what we did last season - not bother about leaking goals as they will score plenty.
We do not have that luxury this season so will struggle to reach top 4
Chelsea
Citeh
Utd
Arsenal
all have potential to outscore us to a CL place

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 17:56:17
Are we looking at Lacazette? It looks good. Thanks.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I wo9uld not hold your breath.}

09 Nov 2014 16:36:27
Why bicker over a handball that wasn't given? Would being awarded that penalty and getting a point give our season anymore impetus? We are a shambles of a football team that can't defend, attack or the do the basics correctly. Brendan has to take the blame and has to go. We need a new philosophy and we need a clear out in January and blood some youngsters till the summer. This will help us with not infringing FFP rules and paramountly at least the kids will give 110% and respect the shirt! Eds 001 in your opinion who do you think will realistically come in mid season and take the managers job?

Believable3 Unbelievable4

{Ed001's Note - I can only see De Boer who would be willing, that is not at a lower league team.}

Another with a short memory. I'd hate to have you or the others on here calling for BR's head watching my back!

Agree0 Disagree0

@ MM The return - so how long do you continue to allow abject, poor performances to continue before changing something? And this is on the back of a massive summer spending spree which has backfired spectacularly. The results and, more significantly, the performances, have been miles off what they should - if it isn't fixed then Rodgers position becomes untenable, he needs to fix the problems or he needs to go - there is no time for us to wallow in the mire.

Agree0 Disagree0

You should change your name then The_Brendans_Advocate.
As a sign of your displeasure!!

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 16:52:06
eds
In October, reports in Portugal claimed that long-time Liverpool target Jackson Martinez wants a January transfer after becoming 'tired' of life in the Portuguese Primeira Liga. Liverpool's strikers (and attacking players) continue to struggle in front of goal, and new reports today suggest that Liverpool are planning to make a huge January offer for the prolific striker.

* Liverpool are planning a €38m (£30m) offer for Martinez.

* Liverpool are in 'pole position' and will make a move in January.

* FSG will give Rodgers the cash to make the offer.
this old recycled news or can you offer any info to support this

Believable0 Unbelievable2

{Ed002's Note - I thought it was Cavani, Lavezzi, Benzema, Higuain and Reus arriving in January?}

Yes and all of them!

Agree1 Disagree0

It is complete fantasy to think we could afford the monumental cost of Jackson Martinez. Even with a good number of sales there is essentially no chance of this happening. On top of that do you honestly think Martinez would want to move to us in our current situation? I think that is fanciful in itself, let alone the financial implications that might it a complete impossibility.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Nov 2014 06:39:17
Come on Ed002 they're all going to Man United aren't they

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 16:36:36
Having watched the last two games it's very clear that most of the dropped players after Madrid game should be starting more often.

Lovern, Johnson, balloteli are awful at the minute

Gerrard has really slowed this season,

Henderson, Coutinho, Mignolet & sterling are struggling

Toure, Can, Lucas, Lallana should start next game

Don't understand what Allen brings to the game

Why buy lambert and not play him.

It's very clear to me BR is out of his depth & stubborn and the owners should employ a Experienced figure at the club to advise him as they wanted to do when they appointed him.

Over £60 million spent on defenders and keepers and we are awful at defending, £20 million international defenders do not become rubbish overnight, it is clearly the coaching.

A couple of weeks with carra that will sort them out

Believable1 Unbelievable3

09 Nov 2014 17:18:28
Carra would be a logical choice but due to his media commitments is unlikely. Hopefully John Henry is still on speaking terms with Steve Clarke and would have him re-join our back room staff.

Agree4 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Ex Liverpool players are not the logical solution to anything. And Stevie was sacked by Liverpool at the behest of Rodgers. I am pretty sure only his middle finger would show any movement at all toward an offer.}

Wish there was an agree with Ed button.

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 19:23:43
I've only mentioned carra in jest as we know he couldn't commit,point being that having watched for years and listened to him last year he clearly know his stuff. .

Buts he's not the only ex pro who could help

Brenden have a word with yourself mate sort out the coaching it just might keep you in a job

Agree0 Disagree1

Former players are too blinded by their love and devotion to the club which blinds their sense of judgement and makes them make bad decisions that are detrimental to the club. Just ask KK and his dreadful handling of the Suarez-Evra saga. We tried that and failed so o thanks. SC has been a head coach so why would he be someone`s number 2 again? BR got SC fired so those asking him to come back need to let it go.

Agree1 Disagree2

Redohio you've given a good answer to which most would agree but intestered to know where you stand on the current situation.

Agree1 Disagree0

Clee, the current situation looks like a bad dream. I cannot for the life of me understand why and how BR has become so stubborn and obstinate in his inability to see the probs we have and continue to play the same old possession footie that got us nowhere fast. He continues to employ a defensive system that doesn`t suit of defenders and leaves the GK exposed during almost every set-piece. BR played a diamond and two up which made us unplayable atimes last year. He was able to adapt his formations to nullify other teams and smash them. This is not the same guy. It looks like the BR who greatly improved us last year was just an imposter. I know he has flaws and needs help BUT I didn`t know he was just filled w/ stupid pride and was so full of himself that he persists with a failed tactic. That is what baffles me about th current situation. The players you mentioned need to be playing for sure. How can we have unity in the squad when players who showed they belonged in a very difficult previous game (Lucas, Lallana, Toure, Manquillo) get benched the very next game for players who have been crap for th 3 prev games before that? Toure is said to be error-prone YET Skrtl who is MORE error-prone plays ahead of him. GJ is useless yet he plays ahead of Manquillo who I personally like and IMO, better than GJ. Lucas gives his all when he plays but gets benched for Gerrrd who is not a DM. These are the things that anger me towards BR (who I have supported even in his most difficult periods when he first arrived). He`s a good coach but he needs to admit he is ways are no longer working because IMO, I feel he persists w/ his useless tactics that have proven to b a failure when he arrived, just to show us the fans nd his detractors in the media that he will bow to nobody. If that is the case then he needs to be sacked in the morning because we will not stand back and let him ruin our great club just to prove a stupid point to God knows who.

Agree1 Disagree0

Spot on mate

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 13:48:46
hey Ed002, I know that BR has recently stated that he doesn't want a defensive coach. but knowing our owners do you think it is likely they may interfere and appoint one? just like they did for the transfer committee i guess?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - I have dealt with this repeatedly, try the search engine.}

10 Nov 2014 06:39:50
is that the one where u said about independent assessment of the way things are going Ed002? (training, transfer etc).

if that is, then gotcha, thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Right.}

09 Nov 2014 13:40:54
Hi Ed002,

You say 2017 may be a piviotal year for the sale of some high profile EPL, clubs - is there any reason for this year specifically and could you share the possible clubs it may be?

Do you hve any idea who Liverpool may be looking to offload in January to try & claw some money back for the FFP rules.

Thanks for your continued input in to the site.

Regards

Crooky

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - There is a very good chance that Manchester United will be sold in 2017. I would not be surprised to see Liverpool sold them. Spurs may well be sold before 2017, but they are another high-profile club that may go then.

I am not aware of Liverpool looking to sell in January to "claw back" anything.}

09 Nov 2014 15:50:32
Is there something specifically happening in 2017 that encourages this sort of activity, Ed002? New regulations or what have you or just a potential coincidence?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - There will be a significant increase in TV revenue.}

10 Nov 2014 06:37:19
So will the new TV deal be much more beneficial to sellers & more attractive to the buying parties?

Do you know of any talks already ongoing to sell these clubs at all?

Thanks again Ed002, much obliged.

Crooky

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I really don't know how you come to such a conclusion.}

10 Nov 2014 06:37:45
Interesting. Thanks, Ed002.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 14:00:27
This was always going to be the season we saw Rodgers' true level. Thefirst season he had a pass, second season we over-achieved, thanks to our amazing world class striker who inspired the whole team, including
our amazing second striker. This season, without Suarez, was always going to be much more difficult, because he was so much more than a goal scorer, although injuries have added to our woes.I was never in favour of appointing Rodgers, due to his lack of experience at a top club He's wasted a hell of a lot of money on defence and it's worse than when he came in.
Mignolet - 12 million
Sakho - 18 million
Lovren - 20 million
Kolo - 0
Moreno - 12 million
Manquillo - 0
Ilori - 6 million
If I didn't know any better, I would say he wants out and is paving the way for his own departure. He's certainly going about it the right way!

Believable9 Unbelievable1

I agree with parts of your post. However, I think BR is not a bad coach and I disagree with the "showing his true level" comment. IMO, I think he`s a very good coach as he should be credited for his relative success last season where he almost won us the league while eploying a fluid system that got the best out of the strikers you mentioned. He has shown he can coach and get the best out of players so he should b credited for that. Unfortunately, what he has shown is the inability to accept that his initial system of boring possession footie w/ no penetration which got us nowhere in his first year is no longer working. He was able to adapt his system to cause probs for teams last year but now, he isn`t doing it. BR played a diamond w/ 2 upfront with energy, pace power and precision. This year? Back to the old possession rubbish. All in all, I think he is trying to be his own man and prove his system will work BUT he lacks the credibility and CV to make it stick. A Mou, Pep, Ancelotti can do that because they`re proven. BR isn`t and cannot dictate to anyone especially if your system is failing and you`re on the brink. That is just stupid pride which gets you sacked in the morning. He has faults and as a progressive manager that we thought he was, he must b willing to accept his faults and change. He must change and go back to a system that is proven in the PL (the 4-4-2 diamond), change the defensive system which leaves us exposed everytime, defend set-piece (a chronic prob that shows no sign of abating), give players like Lucas, Borini and Toure more opportunities (cos those who are keeping them out ain`t that good atm), agree to get a help in areas he is weak in (transfers, defence, communication w/ the press) and most of all, results must change. Failure to do any of these, he will be sacked and he would have asked for it.

Agree4 Disagree1

Redohio quote:
I think he`s a very good coach as he should be credited for his relative success last season where he almost won us the league.
well you would if you have a world class player in suarez who just kept scoring. but with out him what is rogers showing what by the way? because i just se a lazy ignorant manager who doesn't no right from wrong

Agree2 Disagree1

I think he's a good coach, perhaps even a great one, but a poor manager. Everything I've read suggests that his training sessions are well run, enjoyable for the players for the most part, and done with a lot of work on the ball. Conversely, he's awful at transfers, has dodgy team selection and tactics, and is poor at handling substitutions.

Agree3 Disagree0

Zigster, may I remind you that the Suarez you speak of was NOT world class when he came because if he was, we ould NEVER have gotten him for a mere 23m in 2011. He was a very good player who scored tonnes of goals in a weak league. (Even Kuyt did that b4 we signed him so that sys it all). Back then, it took him 4 chances to score a goal and finished with 11 -15 goals in 2012. It was BR that built a system to suit him and put players around him (Hendo, Studge, Couts, Raheem) to help fulfil his potential. First eason under BR, Suarez scored 20 goals and in his second season under BR, he scored 31 goals in a system that allowed him to flourish w/ Raheem, Couts and Studge helping and vice versa. Who was the coach when all this was happening? BR, that`s who. BR made Suarez and not the other way because LS doesn`t coach himself nor does he pick the team and the tactics. If you don`t wanna give him credit for what he did last year, that is your choice BUT stop with the "Suarez made him look good" BS because it`s getting really old and stupid, IMO. We don`t have LS and most importantly, we don`t have Studg which is a huge miss. However, I will agree with you that I cannot understand why he is looking so clueless right now. One would think that the guy who nearly won us the league was an imposter. He`d better change his ways because he will get the sack if results don`t change

Agree4 Disagree0

RDL, great point. He has his flaws as u have mentioned. He needs to accept help and learn from his mistakes because his seeming lack of understanding and a lack of vision of how he wants us to play along w/ his other issues (defence, handling of the media, foot i mouth disease, transfers etc) is hurtin the team. Accepting you are wrong and imperfect while agreeing to get help so as to improve those weak areas is part of being a good individual, not just a coach.

Agree0 Disagree0

Absolutely spot on redohio, couldn't have put it better myself.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 12:47:17
Last week we lost because of Moreno's mistake. Rubbish! We lost because we scored less goals than Newcastle. Yesterday we lost because we scored less goals than Chelsea. Apart from Can's efforts no-one had any idea when it came to scoring - they all passed the buck. The number of times that the ball goes from the left wing to the right and back again is ridiculous and becoming embarrassing. Even when Suarez and Sturridge were scoring goals last season I pointed out that the other players needed to contribute more. I honestly thought that we would see more from Sterling and Coutinho but as yet that has not happened. I don't expect goals from Henderson as his shooting is better suited to Australian Rules Football! Apart from that I believe that we do need a major clear-out. I know that it will lead to huge financial losses but the likes of Sktrtel, Sakho, Allen, Enrique, Borini, Balotelli and Johnson have to go. Gerrard needs to be used from the bench. I would give Lovren until the end of the season. The other acquisitions like Moreno and Can, Manquillo and even Markovic are still developing and the latter deseves another season (and a haircut!). As I have pointed out a couple of times we are still in contention for success - progress in the Champions League, League Cup, and not far off the pace for next season's Champions League. Let's all remember - we can't (and won't) get any worse. One last question - why is there no fuss about Ramires' attack on Sterling? A so-called Suarez dive always got more publicity and caused a media frenzy!

Believable6 Unbelievable4

Pape, I agree that on the face of it, we are still mathematically in contention for theses competitions. However, I am afraid BR won`t be here because he has made promises to the owners he won`t b able to keep. Worse, things don`t look like they are going to change and persisting with this failed system will surely get him the boot. As for the Chelsea game, I was thinking the same thing. Chelsea didn`t play that well, IMO. They only took advantage of our vulnerability and lack of confidence. a peed at the fact that Ramires clearly punches Raheem in the face et he (Raheem) gets booked? If that was a Chelsea player, Mou would have plastered the ref and it would have been all over the papers. Also, the media hardly mentioned the blatant handball by Cahill which should have been a penalty. I guess the that went unnoticed by the media as well. If that was Chelsea that got denied a penalty and we had won, we woul not have heard the last of it.

Agree0 Disagree0

The press seem to take what Maureen Ho (Mo-Ho) says as gospel.

Agree0 Disagree0

Chelsea dominated the game in all area's of the pitch. They were better defensively - more organised, more committed and played as a unit - the chances we had were few and far between. They bossed midfield, the high energy, pressing game meaning we had little time on the ball. And up front they looked dangerous - we didn't.

Individual incidents can have an impact on the game but ultimately we need to look at ourself - it was another poor performance and another deserved defeat: blaming penalties and/or red cards that weren't given is a sign of desperation. If the game was close you might have a point but the gulf in class was huge - Chelsea never looked in danger of defeat and, on another day, could of made the scoreline far more embarrassing.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 11:57:01
Eds fellow reds . Not looking for excuses, for our team, but why was the chelsea player on the floor in goal mouth for there second goal not offside as he he must have been interfering with play and is in an offsid position when ball is struck .

Believable3 Unbelievable0

09 Nov 2014 12:17:03
Probably for the same reason we didn't get a penalty and the Chelsea player wasn't sent off for elbowing Sterling

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - or more likely because the referee didn't deem him to be interfering with play as he was on the floor.}

09 Nov 2014 12:42:10
The referee was terrible yesterday, agree with ed001, for their second he did n't give offside because he did n't think he was interfering, but Mingo had to jump over him trying to get to the ball , so fail to understand how he was n't interfering.
Also the Cahil incident near the end was clear cut penalty, he must have seen it. And for the sake of fairness, there was an obvious Chelsea throw in that he decided to give to us.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - from the footage I have seen, his view was blocked on the handball.}

09 Nov 2014 12:58:48
How can be offside when lovern was on the post

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 13:01:00
Ment johnson

Agree0 Disagree0

If we hadn't have had goal line technology Chelsea wouln't have got their goal. If we had used technology in other important circumstances we'd have been awarded a penalty for Cahill's handball. 2 very important moments in the game which clearly decided the result. For me, if technology is going to be used it has to be used for all the controversial situations not just one. However, no excuses, we were poor simple as that.

Red Rum

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 13:29:24
How can be offside when lovern was on the post
===============
Need to see it again, I thought Johnson was a yard ahead where Oscar (I think) was taking a nap on the goal line

Agree0 Disagree0

Roy you are right at least a yard of the line, and pinky the offside rule is on the field of play and with any part of the body the ball can be legally played with e.g his head and the goal line is in the field of play as is the inside of the goal

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - only if they are deemed to be interfering with play. When they are just lying on the floor, it is understandable a ref would deem them to not be interfering.}

The second goal isn`t a prob for me. I blame the defensive alignment for that. As for the penalty, I have a prob with that. When the play happened, I saw it live and all of us at the bar yelled penalty. Hence, why is it that I can see the incident YET a ref who is on the field and should be on top of things like that, didn`t see it. That is what upsets me out of all things.

Agree0 Disagree0

The referee's association came out and said the ramires forearm was a yellow.

Agree0 Disagree0

Nonsense, IMO. You can`t blatantly punch a player in the face and the useless association tell me that`s a yellow. Ramires has priors (he punched Larson last year and sent al-Ahmadi to hospital w/ a two-footed challenge) and if I can see it, the ref should see it as well. This is not the reason we lost BUT refs need to do their jobs because if the shoe wa on the other foot, Mou would have thrown a fit. Just my opinion.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hopefully our luck will change and we will get a few decisions and Sturridge will stay fit and we can move up the table. Next four games are massive.

Agree0 Disagree0

You`re right about that, Mighty

Agree0 Disagree0

No mate not with referees like that person on Saturday he should be stopped from refereeing after international break just for not doing anything about he assault on Sterling by Ramires if he had committed that in the street he would of been arrested by the police never mind the pens he missed . if he is one of the so called best young refs coming through god help football.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 11:40:52
Take a look at the set piece defending for Chelsea's first goal. Didn't Brendan laugh off the question about needing a defensive coach? That man could turn a back four of Kompany, Ramos, Ivanovic and Lahm into shambles.

Believable10 Unbelievable0

He has been pathetic at organising a defence for the best part of 3 years. I would rather have a new manager who can gain the right balance I think its to late for BR anyway.

Agree4 Disagree0

I almost pulld my hair out when I saw the goal. LFC have plenty of players in the box yet they do absolutely nothing. They just stand there when the ball comes in and leave Mingo exposed against 4 Chelsea players who had enuff time to pass the ball to each other and then score if they wanted to. Yet, we blame Mingo for being a poor keeper. Even Courtois would look useless in that horific system. I cannot understand our chronic defensive woes under BR because while at Swansea, he had one of the best defenses in the PL that year so can`t understand what is going on. For sure, it`s not the players because they were all good b4 they came here and suddenly, they are rubbish. IMO, BR is not interested in the defensive side of things due to the horrific way he sets the team up defenively which is going to get him sacked.

Agree1 Disagree0

Redohio,
I was a little too vocal against you yesterday which I'm putting down to watching the shambles that is Liverpool at the moment but I have to ask you a question. A lot of your posts state that you think BR is a great coach but then you say chronic defensive woes?
If he is such a great coach how has our defense not improved last year and now again this year, is that not the coaches job.
Again apologies for yesterday's reply.

Agree0 Disagree0

DWARFONABOAT, go and check his career to date with his other clubs, his teams have always leaked goals and plenty of them, the man is to arrogant and will fall on his sword. . sooner or later his team will take a hiding and he'll wander were it came from, the man is in total denial about that defence.

Agree2 Disagree0

I say he is a good (not great) coach because of last year and what he was able to do w/ a small squad. He got us playing the best brand of football some of us have ever seen for the past decade plus. He put us in our best ever position to win the PL and had we won you wouldn`t be questioning his coaching credentials if we were struggling the year after. We can debate why we didn`t win BUT the fact of the matter is he got us into that position. He got Suarez playing the best footie of his life and gave Studge, Raheem and Couts their careers back after rotting on the bench or in the cold or w/ their personal probs (Raheem). I know many on here can`t or just won`t bring themselves to admitting that BUT I will do it for them. BR DID ALL THAT! Those are the facts. Not opinions, facts. I will give him his credit for our great improvement and our relative success because he deserves it. Now that he is struggling, being stubborn, employing pathetic and failed tactics, showing the ability to not be able to coach the defence to defend a simple corner kick or free kick, and who seems to have become a completely diff person for reasons only he can tell us or won`t tell us, he should be getting the blame which he rightfully is. ED01 agrees w/ me that he`s a very good coach BUT one who has his flaws (foot in mouth disease, apalling in the transfer market, inability to fix our leaky defence for 3 yrs, etc), who needs help BUT refuses to take it and for some dumb reason, refuses to change his boring, stale tactics. In short, one who needs help. A lot of help. Those are his clear flaws that will be the end of him if he doesn`t change. Accepting you are weak in certain areas and showing a willingness to change is also part of being a good individual, not just a coach and he is digging his own grave by not recognizing this glaring fact. Should he be sacked? If he continues his pathetic behaviour and results don`t change, then yes.

Agree0 Disagree0

And lest I forget, apology accepted.

Agree0 Disagree0

Redohino mate he may of rescued the players you mention but they were all decent footballers that were bound to come good yes he helped but he did not make them into supermen .Also mate we shipped in 50 premier league goals last season and if we did not have SAS last year we would be were we are this season to date . His two centre halves were scared stiff of costa and both couldn't mark a pools coupon his right back should be playing for some one else joe Allen tidy footballer but not good enough for LFC Henderson has just gone back to his first season performances Stevie is playing in a role not suited to P.C has played well but with out the front man making runs he can't do much. Sterling carrying the team at 19 scary our team depending on a youngster Mario has been a let down but he has played up front on his own when he obviously can't do that role he needs a partner all in all the whole team looks disjointed lacks confidence leadership from manager and belief in their own ability these are things top managers like the guy in the opposite dug out Saturday bring to his players his team and I don't believe that Brendan has brought to our side to date but hopefully he can after the break because if he does not he will be under intense pressure to keep his position

Agree0 Disagree0

Albey, he helped them be great last season and that is the fundamental job of a coach so you made my point for me. The other points you make are valid and I agree w/ all of them.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 11:35:36
I've never seen such an unsuitable complement of players for a specific system. It's all over the place. There's been debates on here previously arguing that moneyball is a baseball concept; maybe, but it works on statistics and percentages. Consequently you can apply it to whatever sport you like and adapt it to suit required criteria.

Mistakenly the owners have tried it with LFC and we're now seeing its flaws and why it doesn't work in football. Lovren most challenges won last season so we spent £20 mill, at least £10mill over the odds, from a footballing perspective we now have two brain dead centre halfs who both commit (example yesterday Chelsea's first goal). Lallana, probably something to do with his work rate and assists, £25mill, £15mill over the odds. Markovic, well I don't know what to say here, amount of times hair bounces must deem him fast in the eyes of the scouts. If he was bought for pace, I wonder if the scouts actually timed him. Stats on this I really don't know. £15 mill over the odds. Ballotelli and Lambert another £10 mill over the odds between them, Mario not necessarily a stat based punt but a gamble based on price. If he comes good, £16 mill potentially turned into £30.

We've basically still got £7-10 mill players but paid way over the odds due to the moneyball concept distorting the picture. Do you honestly think that when the owners authorise Ayre to proceed with a transfer it's based on their footballing knowledge! They'll number crunch based on either or stats or resale potential.

It's a disaster, a complete disaster. Chelsea, Arsenal, City, utd, saints, Everton, spurs and hammers will all finish above us. We're like rabbits in headlights defending, where as your Chelsea's enjoy it. One down and heads go down, there's not one leader amongst our bunch, he left in the summer.

The blame for this isn't unique to an individual, it's a collective disaster from ownership business concepts in the boardroom through to Rodgers, pascoe and marsh on the training pitch.

Teds tenure in my opinions come to an end, either way he has to go at the end of the season. He's a kids coach and that's as good as it gets. The only saving grace here is that an incoming manager will have some good kids to work with Moreno, Sterling, Flanno, Origi, Sturridge and Ibe. Fire sale at the end of the season to give the new manager a blank canvas. Bring Carragher in and team him up with Gerrard, let's see how we go. It can't get any worse.

Believable5 Unbelievable1

{Ed002's Note - The owners have not tried "moneyball" with Liverpool - it is simply not an appropriate methodology for football.

I think you perhaps need to shift your focus from the owners Ozone, although I agree the club has paid well over the odds for a number of players.}

Ozone i'm not sure the 'Moneyball Concept' comes into play here. It is more to do with the club not being able to attract higher calibre players like Sanchez etc and hence overpaying for the 2nd or 3rd choice targets because the selling clubs know LFC are desperate. Add to that an incompetent scouting network and inexperienced coaching staff, the results are bound to be disastrous.
You are right abut the next manager having a very good pool of young talent to work with though. Hence why i think DE Boer would be brilliant for us. He has built a very good young team at Ajax with minimal funds along with losing his best players every season. The owners need to be decisive with BR before top4 is out of sight.

Agree1 Disagree1

It will get much worse if you pair Carragher and Gerrard and ask them to manage LFC.

I think it is unwise to blame the owners tacitly. they have made money available to first KD and then BR and both have spend it badly; about £350 million pounds among them.

My only criticism of the owners would be why they allowed that much money to be spend on players, especially considering the blatant over-paying on some of them.

Going forward, you are correct I think, when you say that there will be players sold to raise money for a new incoming Manager. That really is the only choice as we are in big trouble with FFP and you can thank BR for blowing the last big "splash of cash".

Agree3 Disagree0

There is only one man to blame and it is not the owners who have been nothing but outstanding for this club.

Agree6 Disagree1

09 Nov 2014 13:01:51
So we will finish 9th this season??

Agree0 Disagree0

Yes 9th or there abouts. Let's have the drum roll before Irish Rover hangs his hat on my prediction we wouldn't finish in the top 4 last year.

Agree1 Disagree3

09 Nov 2014 13:34:58
Ozone, Southampton and Westham will drop off come Xmass busy schedule , PL history will support this . unless major derailment (like making Stevie and Jamie managers) we will pick up , I have no doubt , nothing to do with divine right, its just how the premier league is.
But I agree with you, Top 4 seems like a tough task at the moment.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 14:08:52
Ozone, you should read Moneyball as it is a fascinating look into the building of a baseball team. Billy Beane, the GM of the A's did use statistics to analyze and select baseball players. However, he used statistics to determine which stats led to success, and realized that other baseball teams were overvaluing certain stats and undervaluing the more important stats. He then traded for or signed the "undervalued" players and used that roster to compete very well, although he has not been able to win a world series. So the use of stats like # of tackles, pass completion etc. is not moneyball. it is only money ball if the rest of the league undervalued those stats, thus allowing us to get players on the cheap, which we clearly have not. also the stats have to lead to why a team gains points. if pass completion % does not correlate to points in the table then is is a useless stat according to a money ball concept.

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 13:40:13
I think you perhaps need to shift your focus from the owners Ozone, although I agree the club has paid well over the odds for a number of players.}
=========
Hiya Ed002, you say "I agree the club has paid well over the odds for a number of players", This summer was not the first time, the same was said when Kenny bought Henderson, Carroll, Downing etc. Now these are 2 different managers, to me it suggest the problem is else where?

These owners are not bad owners they trying their best to bring in trophies, but I strongly believe they are naive in the football and Premier league sense.

Just like they want to bring in DoF to help Rodgers, I think they need to also bring in a David Dein or Gill or even a Rummenigge type that can oversee football matters strategic and tactical short and long term and let Tom concentrate on the commercial side of things which I have no doubt he is very good at.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Firstly, Dalglish was a long way out of touch when he went shopping and DC was dealing with the transactions. Mr Ayre deals with the financial aspects for Rodgers, so there is no trend.

The owners right now will be, as I have explained, looking for a plan to be formulated - and it makes sense for that to be done independently. It doesn't need a high-profile name to do this it needs understanding. This is a major distraction to them and another very expensive lesson they have to learn.}

Nah Ozone, i wasnt going to use that at all man. I was going to use the one where you knew not buying Salah or Willian (one of the 2) in January that it would cost us the league. Even tho we were top until the last few weeks! Of course you only saidit after the league was over! Top stuff!

Agree2 Disagree0

Ozone criticizes the owner regardless of our results so not too bothered w/ the drivel he spouts on about them. Secondly, Moneyball applies to baseball and ONLLY to baseball, period. People need to go watch the movie or read the book or both before commenting.The owners have backed the two managers they hired but are learning expensive lessons which is hurting the club and violating FFP rules. They need to focus on what to do to stop this binge spending syndrome and as the Ed said, they need to understand what needs to be done b4 getting someone in to revamp the whole setup because from where I`m standing (or sitting), it`s a total crap heap.

Agree0 Disagree0

In fact it was Konoplyanka Rover. Look we can split hairs all day long about Moneyball, your all taking this literally because its a baseball concept. Don't you think the transfer policy is a derivative of its principle tweaked to suit. Either way our transfer policy involves stats for specific positions and age profile; hedging your bets. This has led to a 'group' as Ted calls it, of unsuitable players got a system he's trying to impose. It's an absolute mess.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ozone, I would actually say that FSG has used a philosophy of stats and age combined with the "resale value" philosophy of early Arsene Wenger. I believe I remember FSG actually using Arsenal as an example of buying players with resale value? Less of a moneyball concept. What they have failed to realize is that Arsene found great bargains (Bergkamp who had a failed time in Italy, Henry etc) and won a lot with them, but once you find them you can't sell them. I think their hands were tied, but reality is if you have a top 5 player in the world he is almost invaluable. Was Suarez worth selling at 75 to 80 MM or whatever they got for him. Not if you could have kept him because he gets you Champions League money, higher league table money etc. Once you get the Ronaldo, Bale, Suarez etc you have to find a way to keep them. I can't think of a team that sold a top 50 to 10 player for a record fee and was better off for it.

I think FSG will learn from all the mistakes, but they are painful lessons.

Agree0 Disagree0

That is a possibility, Ozone BUT I just don`t see it, because a lot of American sports use statistics BUT those parameters that bring about those stats are diff from those that generate football stats. Just my opinion.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Nov 2014 06:39:34
Ed002
Moneyball works just have a look at porto/benfica.
our problem is that we will not get permits for south american players.
But we have the money, FSG are writing the cheques and the scouting team are buying players and have been since fsg arrived who are not good enough to play for our worldwide football club.
Malta

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - there is no such thing as 'moneyball' in football, no matter which clubs you try and fantasise about using it, there is no such thing. I wish this idiocy would stop rearing its ugly head every few months. Porto and Benfica do nothing like moneyball. What they do is buy in talented South Americans because it is an easy route into Europe, because they can get a work permit to play in Portugal more easily than most other countries. It is nothing to do with moneyball, it is just stupidity or ignorance that keeps bringing that up. There is no plan in moneyball to buy in at a low cost and sell at a higher price.}

10 Nov 2014 06:38:34
Ed002, I hold the owners majority responsible for this mess. They wanted a 'yes' man and they got one in Ted. It's the owners who have placed a strangle grip on the transfer policy to reduce risk.

Let's get things clear here, they still only spent £30 mill net in the summer and if Borini, Suso, Alberto, Aspas, Coates, Enrique and Assiadi are moved on Jan or the summer, they'll be in transfer spend credit.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Who is it you want as owners?}

Still trashing the owners as usual. SHOCKING!!

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 11:23:13
If i was FSG i give BR until january to turn things around, if not i replace him with a top top foreign coach.
I am sry to say it but i am fed up with BR, he talks a good talk.
Suarez and Sturridge were the difference last season and we had no europe.
He has no clue how to buy players that will really bring us back to the top.
If FSG are clever they bring in a director of football with a football brain.
At least will FSG will be informed that lallana/lovren/lambert are good players but for 50mil they better spend the money on better players from europe.
English players are overpriced and the real top english players are not for sale unless we get lucky.(Sturridge)
Yesterday Chelsea had 9 players on the pitch from other countries and they will win the league.
Man U will buy 2 cb in winter and in summer add 3 top players and be better than us again.
We spend the money unwisely and have been doing this for years
Malta

Believable6 Unbelievable0

09 Nov 2014 12:09:55
I seriously think we will drop further down the table if we don't make a change asap. And Rodgers should not be given 1p in Jan.

Agree1 Disagree1

09 Nov 2014 10:48:15
We have gone from a very close second to absolutely lost.
Who's to blame?
You can't live on the glory of one good season, you have to continually prove yourself.
The money wasted last summer is disgraceful. It doesn't matter which way you spin it.
Damien Comolli would be hung for this.

Believable6 Unbelievable0

The scouting dept is being revamped as we speak and tht dreadful commitee should be scrapped ASAP. As for BR IMO, he won`t even make it till Jan if the results don`t change.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 10:36:27
Mignolet was our best player the last to games (apart from the pass at the final whistle)

Believable1 Unbelievable1

He's still a poor keeper.

Agree1 Disagree1

I agree. He has his faults BUT has been good in recent games.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 10:17:44
Question for the ed's,
I really like our current owners, but do you think they will be able to compete with Europe's big boys after this years debacle? The reason I am asking is because I believe we made a step forward last year and at least 2 steps back this year. They can't sell cause they won't get their investment back, and they can't spend cause of FFP. Maybe I am pessimistic but despite their good intentions, it seems their hands are tied, financially speaking. Making personnel changes though is a different matter

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Their hands are not tied any more than anyone else. f Liverpool wish to spend and keep within FFP they have to sell, it is not a difficult concept. The owners are making considerable efforts to bring money in in terms of commercial deals and through the stadium. The deal with Standard Chartered is running down so a new deal for the main sponsor is being sought. The stand naming rights and the stadium naming rights are up for grabs, so that will likely help with expenditure that is coming. 2017 will be a pivotal year financially with a new TV deal - and it will be a pivotal year for the sale of, perhaps, several high profile EPL sides.}

Would you say that finishing at least 4th is crucial for these future deals?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - I would not tray and equate the two.}

09 Nov 2014 12:45:09
Ed002, how much money do we need to bring in, ie selling players, to be able to sign someone thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - It doesn't really work like that Stevie. Liverpool have FFP issues with wages and cannot keep spending money if they wish to play in Europe. Additionally the PL are brining in their FFP. Liverpool have spent and it has backfired. Running wild and building more debt is not the answer - that is what Portsmouth did.}

And Pompey is now almost a barren waste land (football wise).

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Nov 2014 09:27:03
What is everyone's problem with yesterday? It was a glorious defeat, like on Tuesday. Like ken frankie and welshboydave said, we didn't NEED anything from the game, were still in touching distance, so we didn't NEED anything, we played super super well. Get over it guys, come on, we didn't NEED anything remember.

Believable4 Unbelievable7

09 Nov 2014 10:27:59
I was only going on your original (and totally wrong, don't forget that) point that we needed something from the Madrid game,
Your a grown man, that regularly gets his posts chopped or cut for being abusive, calling people out on dead threads, grow up lad FFS, stop embarrassing yourself!

Agree4 Disagree1

Nice bit of sarcasm there bud, it ain't looking good for us.

Agree1 Disagree0

When a team is going through a rough patch they need a little luck, it doesn't matter how good they are. Sissoko was a clear red card last week and Gary Cahill is challenging Joe Hart for England's number one after yesterday performance. We are not getting any luck at all. If the refs do there job right then we might of been talking about 4 points in the last two games. But you never hear the critical lot mention that.

Agree1 Disagree4

Mighty is right. However, our woes are showing no sign of dissipating due mainly to BR`s failed system and his inabilility and/or stubborness to admit it and change his ways. You have to take care of what you can control (tactics, training, systems) and your luck will come.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 09:24:57
Im once again amazed that Ed shows his football knowledge to be viewed through "Chelsea tinted glasses" Reading his posts regarding yesterdays result made me laugh at how hypocritical he is. He should try looking at what he posted after the same fixture last season, where Liverpool had 78% Possession but apparently Chelsea still deserved the win. This won't get posted because he does not want to be exposed as a "Chelski Sycophant" I am a Liverpool fan and I am capable of saying when Liverpool, deserve or don't deserve a win, its a skill you may wish to work on, you are becoming more and more like Adrian Durham each day Ed!

Believable3 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - And which posts about yesterday's game of mine are you referring to? I have not made any of course. This is what I find truly embarrassing about some Liverpool supporters, the need to lie about me in desperation for attention. And which posts about the game last year are you referring to, as there weren't any like that? Another lie.

I can live with you lying about me like this, but it is really embarrassing for the Liverpool fans to have to read it and it does no more than open them all up to ridicule from fans of other clubs and further tarnish their reputation. You keep coming along and trolling the site for some reason I really don't understand.

Mutley, u are an embarrassment to all LFC fans. your one of the many blind and brainwashed supporters of the club who will blame anything other than the incompetent monkeys running the club. When did having more possession make a team better than the other? If Hazard and Costa had their shooting boots on, Chelsea would have humiliated us. The number of times they ran past our midfield and fullbacks was enough to show Chelsea actually knew what to do with the ball when they had it, unlike the headless chickens wearing the LFC jersey. Chelsea came with a solid game plan and deserved the 3 points. If u want to direct your frustrations at someone, it should be Brendan and his staff consisting of clueless amateurs.

Agree8 Disagree3

I actually think ed2 is very fair with his opinions on liverpool, sometimes we don't like what he says but that doesn't mean that it's not the truth. His insight into where lpool are going wrong is spot on.
Plain truth is we are a shambles at the moment and anybody who says we over achieved last year is buying into the bs.

Agree2 Disagree3

002, she is cool in my book ;-)

Agree2 Disagree3

09 Nov 2014 12:02:55
I myself used to dislike some of the comments made by you Ed002, but it seems as though you've been pretty much bang on the money every single time. Cheers to some honesty!

Agree1 Disagree2

09 Nov 2014 15:27:23
Agree ed ya rub people up the wrong way but in the end you are right or very close you keep the site different and better than others

So Ed002 do you think Rogers will soon get sacked

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed002's Note - "Soon" is subjective. I have (repeatedly) explained what I see the initial way forward is. The owners need to do what is best for the business and the club. The club has become rather albatross like in recent months. Perhaps if the manager stopped talking to the press so much it would be easier to deal with matters in house.}

10 Nov 2014 06:36:25
Ed002 and I have had our differences in the past BUT I have to say that she tells it as it is and it`s a pity some clueless people on here just can`t handle the truth and resort to mindless drivel like the above poster just did.

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - I think Mutley is probably too dumb to know the difference between a 1 and a 2, as I was the editor making posts about yesterday's game.}

09 Nov 2014 09:16:20
Eds, I was listening to a sports radio station here in the UK, the presenters were talking to a well known local reporter and commentator who is a Liverpool fan. He was saying along the lines that despite our season so far, he didn't believe BR was under pressure from the Owners etc. Think that is naive. Surely BR will be under pressure, especially after the amount of money being spent on new recruits, the possibility of not qualifying for the next round of the CL. We've already played Ludogarets and Basle and struggled. We're playing Ludogarets on their own psych next.

Also, I've heard some fans say that BR is having his Fergie moment! I.e. When Fergie was nearly sacked after 3 seasons but managed to turn it around. Hence, these fans are saying that BR should be given 2 more seasons. Can't believe I'm hearing these things. That Fergie moment was 25 years ago, BR may be having that moment, but the games changed so much since those days, that it's nots feasible to give him 2 more seasons (let alone 2 more months). Some fans needs to stop harking back to those days.

Believable7 Unbelievable0

09 Nov 2014 10:43:08
i would trust Ed002 on these matters. BR is under immense pressure.

Agree3 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - I have not said anything at all about sacking BR at this time. However, he is of course under pressure - RH would have had a better return in terms of points at around this stage of the season. A lot more pressure has been added by what are seen by many as naive tactics. The most significant issues are arising as a direct result of his foot and mouth problems. I understand that the owners have been asking for "opinion" on the situation.

A word about the Fergie moment. People forget that ManU did so well not only because they were patient with Fergie but also because they were inpatient with Ron Atckinson and sacked him relatively early in the 1986 season (November - exactly around the time we are now) in order to bring Ferguson. So it is not enough to be patient. You have to be patient if you have a Ferguson and less patient if you have an Atckinson. By the way, the season before Atckinson was sacked, United, under him won 13 of their first 15 games, were favourite to win the league but then finished 4th - remind you of someone? It is true though that when he was sacked ManU were second from bottom - and we are not there (not yet anyway). I don't think BR is a 'Fergie' or anything close to it. Much more Atckinson to me. But whoever he is he clearly struggles to change the team and this should be the main test. Some managers, like Van Gual in ManU this season, struggle to get the results but you can see a difference, small imprvements in going forward, in the spirit, in the energy, in fighting back. When things improve it is easier to have a case to have more patient. Anyway, no more posts from em about the need to sack BR - I gave up on that one, I think he is with us until the end of the season, let's see where this brings us. Maybe Sturridge will bring the change everyone expect him to.

Agree2 Disagree0

By opinion do you mean they are asking those more knowledgable to the game whether Rodgers should go? For me the last two seasons I have stuck with Brendan. First season I can accept transition trying to get the passing game installed in the players. Last season nobody expected what happened to happen but those last 5 games he needed to just do what was needed rather than continue trying to constantly attack and win the games such as the Chelsea one. This season instead of taking that philosophy we are slow, no fight, poor shape except the Madrid game. The 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 formation does nothing for our team it leaves the striker whether Its Balotelli or Sturridge in the Southampton and City games isolated, the wingers don't seem to get forward enough and Gerrard in the defensive midfield role isn't working this season. As for the money spent Can looks like if they get him fit he could be a great signing but the rest have struggled. Lallana is not being used for some reason, all the defensive players bought have no hope because the lack of defensive coaches at the club and Lambert and Balotelli are struggling with the lack of creativity and support upfront.
Back to the original question do you think if results up until the United game mid December continue the way of recently Rodgers could be in serious trouble?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No of course not.}

09 Nov 2014 11:24:44
Ed002, are you allowed to mention who they've gone to in respect of asking for "opinion on the situation"?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - It is really not worth it right now. What it shows is that they are looking to help and to find a way to make improvements. The owners are not taking specific questions on Liverpool in interviews any longer. The are answering only broad general questions and questions about the stadium. They are focused on sponsorship and looking to increase commercial revenue (hence the meetings in the Middle East and London during recent days). They really don't need the distraction of the team performances - a team which they invested in to (a) get success on field, and (b) provide a boost to commercial negotiations.}

To be fair to Rodgers, out of the past 10 years this is only our second worst point total after 11 games. Unfortunately for him, the worst is himself in 12/13 with 12 points.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 12:03:09
Ok, thanks Ed002 for the reply.

Agree0 Disagree0

Very informative. Thanks, Ed!

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 09:12:14
Eds, some of you and others here suggest BR is in risk of going, at least if we don't improve very quickly. I personally think he should go (although can understand the opposite view as well) but it doesn't feel like he is about to. The bookies don't think he is in trouble (he is 5 or 6 in the list of next manager to go home, he looks very confident (ok they always look like that) and the press is backing him 100%, everyone I have heard or read in the press think whereever we finish this season it is insane to sack him because of last year and because we couldn't expect anything without Suzrez and Sturrdige (an interesting question why the media, which can be quite patientless with politicians and other celebrities, always support managers and strongly criticise woners who sack them even though some of the owners like Abramovich and the City owners showed over the years they know what they do). The fans are not very voicefull in their demands he should go, there doesn't seem to be an obvious replacement and it is quite a costly process. No one knows(?) what is in the owners mind but it doesn't feel like they want to go through this hussle. I know things can change very quickly on this front but I think they will stick with him until the end of the season and maybe decide in the summer.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

Ed033 Note: The Liverpool Player Ratings page has been updated to the latest Liverpool match.

You can also vote on Man of the Match for the latest game using our Liverpool Man of the Match Polls page.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

09 Nov 2014 08:54:20
Morning all

Safe to say this jan I can see a lot of players leaving. Lucas, suso, borini, Johnson and even mario.

I think we will buy a new striker if this is the case. I just don't see how Brendan and the club didn't go for a striker full of movement. And we all know studge is made out of glass so we can't always rely on him.

Top 4 could be a challenge without a real fluid strike partnership.

I am not one for sacking Brendan the blame for these consistent poor peformances and poor pick of teams has to fall to him.

The only manager who could progress us who would fall into FSGs policy has to be De Boer.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

It would be stupid of the club to let go of Lucas when there is no other CDM at the club. I would play Lucas regularly for the rest of the season, and phase Gerrard out of the first team and then buy a world class CDM in the summer. Balo, Johnson, Enrique and Suso (so we can get something for him than let him go for free) need to be moved on in Jan, and hopefully a top striker like Higuain or Jackson Martinez will be signed along with a quality GK.

Agree3 Disagree1

09 Nov 2014 04:03:57
Ed002, why does mourinho despise Liverpool, what is the underlying reason?
I thought it was wrong for Toure to be on the bench today.

Believable0 Unbelievable5

{Ed002's Note - Paranoia. Mr Mourinho does not despise Liverpool.}

Hibsylfc, I think deep down he'd love to manage LFC. . can't see it happening though. .too much baggage.

Agree3 Disagree0

Mou is a pro. He doesn`t that LFC. He just loves beating us. Simple!

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 04:03:03
Anybody else think Ed002 should be liverpools director of football and replace the transfer commitee?

Believable5 Unbelievable2

09 Nov 2014 07:51:54
Nope, he'll be purposefully terrible. He'll do a job for Chelsea. I'll consider myself a better option.

Agree2 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - why would he do a job for Chelsea? What a stupid statement. You might be unable to act like a professional in your work, but I am quite sure the rest of us are perfectly capable of doing so, certainly Ed002 is.}

I know the transfer committee gets a lot of stick and rightly so, but I still think some of the underperformance of our signings is a mystery. Take Balotely. Yes some people, even here, thought he is a risk. However a lot of the warnings were about his behaviour on and of the pitch which I think has been actually fine so far - no red cards or anything like that not too mna headlines for the wrong reasons. Yes some people warned that he is a bit lazy and he not what we need to replace Suarez in terms of movement but no one, even the greatet critic of this move, thought that after ten league games in which he started (or 9?) and played most of the game, he will not score even once, hardly get any shot on goal, look helpless every time he gets the ball and then lose it very easily, being got in off side positions again and again as if he just heard about this new role etc. We all saw him in City, We saw him in the Italian national team score fantastic goals, He did score 12 and 14 goals for Milan in the last two seasons, he is only 24, wasn't injured or anything but looks as if his best days are behind him. Same with Ricky Lambert. He was a decent striker for the Saints, socred 15 and 13 goals last tow seasons, went on to score 3 for the national team despite all the hype and the pressure and joining it when relatively old but for us he looks in complete shell shock. Markovich who everyone who saw him in Benfica thought he was amazing and again total shell shock. Lallana who was supposed to be our new star didn't start in our last two games and didn;t even come from the bench yesterday (a mistake I think) did very little so far an he was fantastic for Saints. You just have a feeling whoever they bring to this team this year, lose all their confidence. And this should have been BR's strongest skill being a people person and all that. For me he should take some of the blame for that and all the blame to how poor our more experienced players look. In any case his fault or not - he showed he cannot improve them so time for him to go.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 09:03:57
Because Ed002 is a lad ed001, simples really :-)

Good game yesterday guys, unlucky about that penalty

Agree0 Disagree1

The problem with Balotelli is people only look at the total number of goals and not where they came from. Of his 14 last year, only 7 were from open play, the other 7 were penalties and free kicks. He also took around 140 shots to get those 7 open play goals which is an absolute abysmal conversion rate for a striker (Sturridge had 21 in 99 shots, as an example of an excellent conversion rate).

Short version is if Balotelli wasn't in the news for his off-pitch activities, I doubt most would have ever even heard of him.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 03:04:42
The boys, in total, from what Brendan picked, did a good job today. Yes we were unlucky not getting the penalty but the boys did well.

After the shocking performance at Madrid, which has wrongly been made out to be a great game, we did very well today.

Coutinho, who arguably was the best player on the pitch in a red shirt, was substituted for very defensive Joe Allen. Why would you do that??

Was impressed with Mario's work rate and determination during the first half but think he was substituted a little bit too late.

For me, Lallana should of come on because we didn't have any creative people having taking Coutinho off!

Brendan really needs to think about his formation, Mario upfront on his own isn't working, and his substitutes! The game was crying out for Lallana!

Believable5 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - a good job is losing now is it?? Losing convincingly at that. Sorry but they were again completely outplayed, that is not a good job by any stretch of the imagination.}

09 Nov 2014 03:30:50
And by outplaying what do u mean Ed001? Would u have said the same thing had we had the penalty to equalize?

Agree7 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - yes, because Chelsea were by far the better side yesterday. I don't even get why you are asking, unless you missed the game. Chelsea did the same as Madrid, just enough to beat us, they could have gone on and scored more, but they sat back and just let us do our best. Again our best was simply not enough, or even close to enough. Hitting and hoping from long range to get lucky deflections or handballs is hardly tactical genius is it?}

When Mourinho after the game says something to the effect that he was never worried in the second half because the pressure was nowhere near what he normally expects at Anfield, you have to ask questions. Perhaps he's just rubbing it in a bit but I rather suspect he was just being honest.

Agree3 Disagree0

A relegation fighting team would have given better performance than Liverpool yesterday. After resting 8 players and making a big show about selection I thought we will kill this game and what we got? A miserly performance. Just before the goal by Costa the whole formation was haywire, giving away ball so cheaply like amateurs.

Agree3 Disagree0

It is quite simple really, Rodgers has gone back to the system which he sold to FSG when he got the job.

It is called *Possession Football*. He even referred to it in was of his most recent interview as 'dangerous possession'.

Our game is based on playing out from defence and it is just painful to see how slow we have been in our build up play. Our defence always ends up with more passes than our midfield. Quite astonishing to be honest.

Then our attack, how many more times does Rodgers have to see with his own eyes that Balotelli is not a lone striker?

I said yesterday that Mourinho would have a big fat grin on his face if Rodgers started Balotelli up on his own again and just love it when I am right!

Agree3 Disagree0

Eds and reds did u think at the start of the season this was a game we would win? Chelsea were the winning team when we had SAS, they greatly improved their squad by buying the finisher they needed and strengthening everywhere there were weaknesses. They are/were odds on to win the PL from the start so would anyone have thought we could of beaten them irrespective of circumstances and recent form? I for one never thought we would so the result is hardly a suprise. They did play better yesterday than the performances which have brought such criticism ie west ham, newcastle ( every game since Spurs!) so I do think there needs to be some acceptance of what the poster is saying. Let's face is balo is never going to work out as long as he has got a hole in his donkey (see what I did there!) and God knows what the answer is with the CB pairing but hopefully a new GK will be bought in jan to give the defence confidence and a world class striker to pair sturridge (whilst getting rid of balo) and then we can crack on to challenge for 4th and fingers crossed we can remain in the competitions till then and have a chance at some silver wear. The BR out argument will run on I just hope this game is something we build from to smash palace in 2 weeks

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - with the right manager, you expect to stand a chance of winning. With Rodgers in charge, following a dreadful transfer window, no I didn't expect us to stand a chance of winning. But that isn't because of Chelsea's quality, it is because of our lack of fight, quality, work rate, pace, movement, defensive positioning, attacking threat etc etc.}

Brendan needs to be thankful Costa and Hazard left their shooting boots back home, otherwise the scoreline would have been humiliating. Not to forget Mr Werner was at the game yesterday and hopefully he takes the necessary measures to arrest the club's slide, even if it means getting rid of Rodgers and his cronies from Swansea. Allen on for Coutinho when the team needed goals was just stupid by Brendan, i have lost all faith in him. Its laughable how so many blind LFC supporters try to pick out non existent positives in the team.

Agree7 Disagree0

We were outplayed. BR is turning the team into a very bad team at the moment. everyone just look lost in the field. knowing our owners, i feel BRs time with us are not long.

he has very little time, if any

Agree7 Disagree0

Chelsea didn`t need to play all that well to beat us and that is the most difficult thing to accept.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 02:55:54
just an observation but Chelsea attacked in numbers and defended in numbers, even on the break they seemed to have player supporting each other they always looked to outnumber us at each end! we seemed sparse and struggled at both ends especially attack.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

Our fitness sucks. I've been banging on about it forever but I often think it isn't so much Henderson runs a lot as everyone else just runs so little! Every game I watch I see people like Ivanovic crossing it on one end on one play and then blocking a ball off the line the next whereas we seem to struggle to get from side to side for 60 minutes as any sort of unit. Maybe I'm just misreading it, but our players just don't look fit to run for long periods to me.

Agree7 Disagree1

Both posts I agree with. I find in particular that our attacking players seem incapable of putting in a real shift and of tracking back, helping out the team, etc etc. Coutinho, as creative and skillful as he is, is the worst for it. Never tracks back properly and never puts in a tackle - as this level we cannot afford to have passengers and we have loads in our team. Like many other issues a huge worry.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Nov 2014 00:16:50
What this rumour with balo and 3rd party. Thought you couldn't do that in england

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Ed033 Note: The Liverpool Player Ratings page has been updated to the latest Liverpool match.

You can also vote on Man of the Match for the latest game using our Liverpool Man of the Match Polls page.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

 
Change Consent