02 Feb 2015 22:02:11
Eds fellow reds .just had a little chuckle to myself .i see salah gone on loan til end of season .bet he whichever he had signed for us now .unlucky greedy git enjoy Italy .another chelsea legend leaves .ha ha ha .
Pretty hard for him to sign for us since we never agreed a fee with Basle.
{Ed002's Note - The issue was that he could not settle in England. I am not sure why the original poster has so much hate given that Liverpool made only a laughable bid before Rodgers stuck his foot in hi mouth over the player. A little embarrassing for Liverpool.}
He never wanted to play for us not too bothered.
Top comment King Luis! What an embarrassment for Chelsea with this Salah Saga!
{Ed002's Note - Why say such a stupid thing about a player who could not settle?}
03 Feb 2015 00:35:20
embarrasment 4 chelsea ??? a squad player leaving , bit sad if that is the highlite of your season ?????? 1 worldclass player we got 2day and still in profit , forever in our shadow
Apart from being in their club`s shadow which is misleading IMO, he has a point, lads.
It does show how clever Chelsea have been in my opinion by stockpiling players so that when they need a player for a high fee they sell a couple for a high fee and balance the books.
They have 40 odd players out on loan.
All young with good resale value.
Good strategy considering financial fair play.
Forever in Chelseas shadow?! is he having a laugh. seriously. lol
03 Feb 2015 09:25:04
But when we do similar BR hater's on here say they have been Brendaned. Just can't win
03 Feb 2015 09:40:18
Laughable bid by whose standards? We bid for him what he was worth.
Chelsea overpaid. Simple as that.
{Ed002's Note - No, Liverpool's bid was actually a joke. But Rodgers' stupidity did for any chance of a deal.}
I am not getting to upset about Salah leaving on loan but i am getting quite envious about their ability to do buisness. They certainly bring in the right players more often than we do and if a player turns out to be wrong for whatever reason, they manage to get either a good amount of money or a ridiculous amount of money for him.
Why are some poster showing such an obsession with Chelsea? Salah had it all to do regarding competition there and could've had a decent spell had we signed him. We didn't and it really didn't seem to have anything to do with the lad if we didn't make an acceptable offer. Showing bitterness at him is poor form.
03 Feb 2015 12:30:01
I think maybe some thought it was the SWP's saga all over again, Chelsea getting him to stop us doing the deal, but as Ed has said this time, we didn't offer enough!
{Ed002's Note - Not only that, Rodgers opened his mouth again.}
Chelsea flopped salah, he was ripping teams apart for years at Basel, and chelsea ruined him. And how can you lot say they did good business when they sold a good player as in schurrle and signing cuadrado and loaning out salah. Sold schurrle 28m = 2m profit n 12m salah =0 to buy cuadrado in 26.5m my calculations they lost out in 8m 2 players n gained 1
{Ed002's Note - Chelsea actually made a profit (again) on transfers in the January window. Why do you want to make everything about Chelsea and share your ignorance of what has happened? This is so embarrassing.}