Liverpool Rumours 189707

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

24 Apr 2015 22:44:39
One thing I don't understand and never understood is why clubs (as well as national teams) don't have an article in the contract limiting the compensation in the case of sacking.

In almost every job contract now a days the employer keep the right to dismiss the employee with very limited compensation, usually 3 months salary at best. And yet again and again you hear how the FA is still paying Svan Goran Arikson his salary from five years ago.

This is relevant for us because it seems that even if the owners want to sack BR they will have to pay him huge compensation after signing a 4 years contract with him last summer. Given our financial problems this will not make it easy for them to sack him (which I am now pretty sure they will not).

Agree1 Disagree1

25 Apr 2015 07:37:33
Can managers insert a clause if they do really well and get the opportunity to go to another club for more money, they can quit with the club receiving any compensation. It's a two way street. If clubs offers players/managers silly contracts then they have to honour them.

{Ed002's Note - Why would a club accept anything like that?}

25 Apr 2015 17:14:06
when managers want to resign for whatever reason they always do so with no compensation to the club.

{Ed002's Note - No, that is not correct.}







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass  
 
Change Consent