Liverpool banter 209208

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.



16 Apr 2017 09:25:45
I can't understand how vvd is being touted around at 50 million and Sakho at 15-20 million. Either Sakho is undervalued or vvd is over priced.

Agree10 Disagree2

16 Apr 2017 09:34:37
Well, it doesn't help that Sakho is considered to have an attitude problem and his parent club want to sell him. It's not purely ability based mate.

16 Apr 2017 09:36:05
Van dyk is a good defender but i think Sakho is better than Lovern/ Klavan any day. Him and Matip would be a good pairing.

16 Apr 2017 11:00:08
How many goals did Liverpool ship in when Sakho was in the team?

16 Apr 2017 11:36:12
50 48 and 50, in the 3 seasons he's been here, we're at 40 now with 6 games left so our defense is no worse without him,

16 Apr 2017 12:12:33
And no better with him.
Time to look elsewhere rather than wishing sakho is the answer.

16 Apr 2017 12:13:28
sorry this will fly in the face of opinion but at 50mil id rather keep lovren/ gomez/ klavan.

{Ed025's Note - good idea that bruffio...if you want to end up in the championship, you have to realize that its not your money so let the club spend as much as it takes in my eyes mate..

16 Apr 2017 12:24:55
I just think at 50m its way overpriced and i know its not my money and if he came to the club and had the liverbird on his chest id be behind him 100% but at 50 mil id rather try and get bonnucci from juventus at the price.

16 Apr 2017 12:55:53
I really do not care how much the club spends to sign a decent CB. We cannot go into a UCL season with either LOvren or Klavan as first choice CBs. Matip needs a decent partner with LOvren and Gomez as back ups. Klavan needs to go. Van Dijk is not the answer though. $0 million on Gimenez or Laporte is more like it.

16 Apr 2017 12:59:17
Spending big on quality players will pay back in CL qualification, premier league prize money and cups. got to invest big these days.

16 Apr 2017 13:04:24
A player is only worth what someone is willing to pay for them.

People can put a price on someone but it doesn't mean they will go for that.

16 Apr 2017 13:57:14
I don't get why your all struggling with this, its simple to me.

Sakho is not wanted by Liverpool so that decreases his value as no one will pay premium for a player buying clubs know selling clubs want rid of. also he has attitude problems which again decreases his value as no one wants to pay big money for a player they may want rid off once there in a position to attract better quality.

VDV is Southampton's best defender so he is there most valuable cb which adds to his price as they do not want to sell. he is also wanted by a host of rich clubs which also means Southampton can ask for even more in the hopes of starting a bidding war as one team will be more willing to pay for a player they think will be valuable to them.

there is no set price for players you have to take into account what he is worth to the selling club i.e Southampton need him to qualify for Europe. and what he is worth to the buying club i.e Liverpool want him to compete in the Champions League.

16 Apr 2017 15:45:01
I am not so sure matip is the long term answer but I also think it's so hard to judge how good he is due to the injuries we have had? We need a good solid partner for him and then we can see who our best pairing is. What are your thoughts eds 2? Cheers.

{Ed002's Note - There is no doubt that van Dijk is a good player but Lovren is no fool either. I think having a settled pairing will help the defence, but someone who could also play as a DM to replace Lucas might be the best option.}







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass