Liverpool banter 212860

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.



06 Aug 2017 10:12:51
I am so confused regarding VVD situation at Southampton. Has the player stated he want to leave the club and join Liverpool.?
I have read this morning that Southampton football club are playing hard ball. Surely if a player wants to leave he can force the move.

Eds I know you have covered this so many times already over the summer but is there any clarification so we call all chear or move on.

{Ed025's Note - he is under contract end of, he can ask to move all he wants but its up to the holding club what happens mate..

Agree3 Disagree0

06 Aug 2017 10:26:58
VVD can also refuse to move to Chelsea and Southampton can refuse any offers from Liverpool.

Should Liverpool make a bid, it will be down to Soton deciding whether they want a player who has made it explicitly clear he wants to go, keep him and hope he sorts his head out or making Liverpool pay the ultimate price being a record fee for a defender.

Game of cat and mouse.

06 Aug 2017 10:30:22
He signed a 6year contract extension in January.
I don't think he will find much sympathy for his situation.

06 Aug 2017 10:57:26
I don't see that there is situation to be confused about. Southampton don't want, or need, to sell. They specifically don't want to sell to us. We messed up big time by trying to be underhand. If the player moves, it will likely be to Chelsea.

06 Aug 2017 10:59:03
If we sell Coutinho for 120 mill (or whatever price) then I have a funny feeling that I know what Saints will quote us for VVD.

06 Aug 2017 10:57:26
I don't see that there is situation to be confused about. Southampton don't want, or need, to sell. They specifically don't want to sell to us. We messed up big time by trying to be underhand. If the player moves, it will likely be to Chelsea.

06 Aug 2017 10:59:03
If we sell Coutinho for 120 mill (or whatever price) then I have a funny feeling that I know what Saints will quote us for VVD.

06 Aug 2017 10:45:54
He's indicated that he would be happy to go to Chelsea apparently.

06 Aug 2017 11:07:49
Ron, nobody knows what was promised in signing the contract. We do know that Southampton met with clubs after him signing a contract in January. So that shows something was agreed in negotiations of that contract.
We all know that Liverpool met the player without permission. A misunderstanding apology was given.
I think the player saying he wants to play for Klopp took away the Auction that Southampton was hoping for.
All Southampton need to do is refuse to do a deal with Liverpool similar to what United did yrs ago with Heinze.
The player then as a deadline decision to make Chelsea or City.
liverpool and the player will only have themselves to blame.

06 Aug 2017 14:52:19
Saints won't sell, the player will probably want to play in the World Cup 2018. He won't do that if he's not playing and training on his own.
He is shafted big time. Chelsea is his only lifeline. If Chelsea don't up their bid the he will have to crawl back to saints with his tail between his legs.
He's a stupid unprofessional fool who has taken very bad advice.
Having said that, Klopp has been equally as stupid and unprofessional in this matter.

06 Aug 2017 15:02:44
"We do know that Southampton met with clubs after him signing a contract in January. So that shows something was agreed in negotiations of that contract"

I don't understand the logic, sorry. Saints can meet with any club at any time and discuss any player, it doesn't mean it has anything to do with his contract.

{Ed002's Note - The meetings that took place are unrelated to the contract extension but are related to the involvement of the Jansens after Henk-Maarten Chin was dumped.}

06 Aug 2017 15:40:18
Cheers ed, so nothing to do with VVD.

{Ed002's Note - The meetings were about him.}







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass