01 Feb 2016 12:31:34
Are the rumours true that Liverpool are stopping Sinclair moving to Watford because they want to use him as a makeweight in other deals? If true do you know what deals?
01 Feb 2016 13:08:41
I can't see a non English team taking him imo.
{Ed002's Note - He has turned down an offer from Spain. I am not sure what deals the original poster expect Liverpool to be using Sinclair in today.}
01 Feb 2016 13:54:43
Yeah, shaktar want 50 mil for teix but will halve that request if we throw in the highly sought after Sinclair.
01 Feb 2016 13:26:18
Ed002, he got it from a Times journalist on Twitter. Makes no sense to me as he's out of contract in the summer.
01 Feb 2016 13:44:58
Ed002, its just twitter nonsense from Sami Mokbel from the Daily Mail. Personally I expect today to be a quiet deadline day and Jim White to get the hump about it.
01 Feb 2016 13:26:18
Ed002, he got it from a Times journalist on Twitter. Makes no sense to me as he's out of contract in the summer.
01 Feb 2016 13:44:58
Ed002, its just twitter nonsense from Sami Mokbel from the Daily Mail. Personally I expect today to be a quiet deadline day and Jim White to get the hump about it.
01 Feb 2016 18:02:47
its crap. as far as i'm aware Sinclair is contracted till the end of this season meaning that while he has been able to talk to, and sign a pre-contract with foreign teams since Jan 1st he is not allowed to talk to, or sign a pre contract with english based teams until some point in May. Ed's please correct me if i'm wrong.
{Ed023's Note - I think it's June but yes you are correct in what you're saying}
01 Feb 2016 18:09:37
Cheers Ed23. wasn't sure if it was one or two months before the end of his contract.
{Ed023's Note - You're welcome}
03 Feb 2016 08:57:39
Is there a reason we're not selling while can make something rather than letting him run down contract - would we be in for more in compensation if he left on a "free"?
{Ed001's Note - possibly.}
03 Feb 2016 09:02:57
Thanks Ed, possible lesson learned from our problems with Ings fee then?
{Ed001's Note - I would assume so.}