Liverpool Rumours Member Posts

 

Dennerly's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



Dennerly's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Dennerly's Posts

 

 

To Dennerly's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Dennerly's last 5 banter posts

 

To Dennerly's last 5 banter replies

 

Dennerly's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Dennerly's rumours posts

 

29 Aug 2017 23:17:54
I think we should offer Arsenal £40million and one pounds for AOC. Then they can turn it down and he can finally get his dream move to Barca. 😆🤑😆.

Dennerly

1.) 29 Aug 2017 23:44:06
Tat price would buy the entire arsenal team right now.


2.) 30 Aug 2017 00:04:56
Would love to see there reaction if we offered £40,000,001.


3.) 30 Aug 2017 00:26:01
he's not worth that though.


4.) 30 Aug 2017 01:10:08
They would take it and we would look stupid for paying £40m for AOC.


5.) 30 Aug 2017 01:11:01
Arsenal deserve that. Problem is they might accept the bid.


6.) 30 Aug 2017 01:42:01
Do we really need to piss off any more clubs?


7.) 30 Aug 2017 01:50:08
I think the ox is a better player than people think. He has been played out of position too much at arsenal. I accept he is not a brilliant cm but our midfielders are not so straight forward. They chop and change and attack the wings. He could also play in the front three. I would be happy to see us sign him. I really believe klopp could make a reply good player of him. I mean chelsea, arsenal, liverpool and Gareth Southgate want him.


8.) 30 Aug 2017 02:15:09
Form is Temporary, Class is permanent. I know this is in all joking, but I would hope the club would never and nor would fans even think about it.


9.) 30 Aug 2017 02:45:07
Yeah but what if they accept? Ox ain't worth 40 mil😬.


10.) 30 Aug 2017 03:13:59
I'd just offer 1 dollar and see what Wenger has to say to that. Then OX can go happily to Chelsea knowing he would be a squad player at best at LFC and we can then sign Lemar.


11.) 30 Aug 2017 05:52:37
Yeah, much rather have lemar. You keep the ox, we'll take lemar. Apparently Lee dixon turns up at the Emirates and is shown zero respect from the players. Some don't even know who he is! Can you imagine us treating carra like that? Never. There is a lack of heart at arsenal, someone said they were stuck in cruise control and I thought that was z good metaphor. I would take sanchez and I've always admired Ramsey. Would be good at Liverpool. I would be happy with the ox but much prefer lemar.


12.) 30 Aug 2017 06:56:15
Surely Saturday was the litmus test of his ability and it showed a player who simply wasn't at it. Ox isn't worth £40m particularly in the last year of his contract.


13.) 30 Aug 2017 07:03:54
I'm just happy he's turned down Chelski and prefers a move to us!


14.) 30 Aug 2017 07:15:49
Id snap him up for 25m. Young, fast, powerful and wants to play for us. he's a bit of a rough diamond imo and Klopps the best polisher in the business.


15.) 30 Aug 2017 07:25:21
I know people think it is a good joke but 40m for a player in last year of contract, with injury record and not that great a performance record at top level, and only other interested party apparently bud 10m less than that, that isn't funny it is just the kind of dumb screwed up so panic buy the club has done before and shouldn't happen again.


16.) 30 Aug 2017 08:15:32
I'd take the OX as he wants to play for us but not as a lemar alternative. More as a player who will take over from can/ Milner next year.


17.) 30 Aug 2017 08:23:16
Spot on, Fresh. Superred, Ox is not better than he is given credit for. His is actually worse than he is given credit for. Check the game on Sunday to see. The guy is not only a poor footballer, he can't even be arsed to work hard for the team, turning his back to the play arguing with Ramsey (another shambolic player who wouldn't hack it at LFC either) while Gomez intercepted the ball and crossed for Firmino to score.

I don't care about his contract situation. When you're on the pitch, you do your best, end of. Mahrez has no issues doing that whereas every man and his dog, knows he wants out but is still giving his best every game. Ox is not good enough for us and would not start ahead of any of our midfielders or wide men and for 40m? They must be having a laugh. Salah cost less than him and is 5 times the player Ox will ever be.


18.) 30 Aug 2017 08:34:50
We should wait and snap him up for free next year.


19.) 30 Aug 2017 08:42:26
I'd rather we move heaven and earth to get Can on a new contract than waste money on Ox.


20.) 30 Aug 2017 08:58:48
40 mil is too much got the ox. Can't see it bring that much.


21.) 30 Aug 2017 09:58:07
Not often players would prefer playing for us than Man City or Chelsea. VVD And the Ox seems to favour us and it's a good thing.
Maybe it's because of playing time etc but still.


22.) 30 Aug 2017 10:25:46
I'd say you're right Daniel. Although we have a big squad we probably have a smaller top level to the squad and less likely to keep buying big names the way Chelsea and City do. They might also see it as likely that Klopp will stay so if they sign for him they get a chance. Whereas at a City and Chelsea the players probably don't know if the guy they sign for will be there when they start playing so there is always potential they are surplus before they really get a chance.


23.) 30 Aug 2017 10:58:02
Sell Can, replace with the Ox.
That would do me.


24.) 30 Aug 2017 11:12:23
Not Roy Keen on him meself, rather see us get this Lemar fella, he was great in Kajagoogoo. I believe Klopp would make the Ox a better player though.


25.) 30 Aug 2017 11:16:30
People say Markovic is rough diamond and where's that got him? I'm neither for nor against the signing but at £40m with a year left on his contract is far too much for a squad player.


26.) 30 Aug 2017 11:54:29
You're the only one who wants Can to leave, Juicer and thank Heavens, to don't run the transfer dealings at LFC.


27.) 30 Aug 2017 13:00:16
The Juicer, did you actually say sell Can, who is a competent centre midfielder and will be a top class one at that, and replace him with Oxlade Chamberlain who isn't and never will be a top class centre midfielder? Jeez, I have literally heard it all.


 

 

 

Dennerly's banter posts with other poster's replies to Dennerly's banter posts

 

30 Jun 2017 23:35:12
1st time rant, so go easy.
At times last season we were unbeatable, the 3 players we missed most were Matip, Coutinho and Mane. When they weren't in the team we really suffered (Ok, Hendo too, but Emre is an able deputy) . If we sign VVD and Keita to go with Salah we've got top class replacements for all 3 if they're not fit.

When they're all available we'll have better strength in depth than we've had in years and the competition for places motivates players, especially with UCL games to play in. Would that not be a good transfer window? For a change?

Dennerly

1.) 01 Jul 2017 03:53:04
i agree Dennerly, but somehow i don't feel like we'll be getting both or even 1 of VVD and Keita. there's a lot of rumours, talks going around but until i see them confirmed, i won't be getting excited.

if however we do manage to pull both, including atleast a LB if not another RB as well, we do have better strength in depth and i expect us to challenge on all competitions next season. it does however, mean that its a make or break season for klopp for most likely breaking the transfer record 3 times in a row (VVD>Keita>Salah) in a single season.


2.) 01 Jul 2017 04:30:04
Change VVD to someone who can really defend and not just rely on his speed to make a last ditched tackle and it would be a great transfer window for us. For me the problem is all the extra games people talk about- if we don't play well in the qualifying rounds and are kicked out of CL then we have a bloated squad and will be very difficult to keep everyone happy. On a side note don't you guys think the last 2 managers we have/ had-Klopp and Rodgers are like kids in a candy shop when it comes to tranfer.


3.) 01 Jul 2017 08:01:44
Klopp did very well last season in terms of transfers, and this year Solanke and Salah seem shrewd. can't put him in the same bucket as the previous seasons where it seems quantity was prioritised over quality (with a couple of notable exceptions) .


4.) 01 Jul 2017 08:04:21
Rodgers may have been like a kid in a candy shop, and plenty of fans are but that's not the same with Klopp.
I'm not sure how you arrive at that conclusion.


5.) 01 Jul 2017 08:18:53
Spot on, Crazy. To the OP's post, the issue is not that the players we are looking at (NK and VVD) will not improve us. The problem is their evaluation and price. That is the issue for me. 140m for two players who for one, is a HUGE gamble for a player with only one season in a top league tho talented, and for the other who is talented but has a lot of faults to his game. That is my issue.

People say "the money is irrelevant". Well, that is patently false. If that was the case, why did Chelsea (who spend like no tmrw presumably) had to back down from VVD and Bonucci both better than VVD, by the way) cos they were too expensive. Even some of their fans are whining that they can't get their first choice targets. They are now going for Ruddiger (Roma) for 30m. So are people trying to tell me that VVD is worth more than twice the price of a German international (VVD would not even make the stands at CB for Germany) who is more experienced and a more polished CB than he is? Sorry but that makes no sense to me.

There are very good players for great value out there and Mo Salah is a perfect example of that as he is more proven as a player than Keita overall is so I suggest we get to work and find the right players for us instead of dropping 140 for two high risk players. Even Chelsea don't do that anymore.


 

 

 

Dennerly has no Rumour Replies

 

 

Dennerly's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

01 Aug 2017 20:43:04
And I suppose Ribery is scared of the lightning and is just hiding in Trent's back pocket?
Out of position a couple of times but an otherwise mature performance in my book.

Dennerly

 

 





Change Consent