Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

Eds Note - Thanks to everyone who has donated to the charity appeal, over £500 has been raised. It runs until December 11th if you want to donate.

Mag_ic786's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Mag_ic786's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Mag_ic786's Posts



To Mag_ic786's last 5 rumours posts


To Mag_ic786's last 5 banter posts


To Mag_ic786's last 5 rumour replies


To Mag_ic786's last 5 banter replies


Mag_ic786's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Mag_ic786's rumours posts


22 Dec 2016 23:12:08
Hi guys. This apparent Zaha link is everywhere I look, and I've noticed some of the eds don't rate him, nor think we have any interest.
Although it does seem a strange rumour, I do rate him as a player, I think he has 3 goals and 6 assists in a struggling palace side. That's not bad at all.
Can he press and defend for the team? I think he can, he's a good prem winger with the potential to be a very good one.


1.) 23 Dec 2016 00:26:47
We could do better. But there really is no need for him.

2.) 23 Dec 2016 00:34:05
Ojo will be twice the player. No need to waste money on him.

3.) 23 Dec 2016 00:44:48
He's good but not great - we should be keeping what we have and giving Ojo a real shot.

We already have 5 established forwards, Ojo and also have Wilson coming through too so the only reason we should even consider paying up for another forward is if someone like aubemeyang comes up that will actually improve the first team, but that would mean selling someone like Sturridge.

4.) 23 Dec 2016 05:37:30
zaha? poor deluded pardew thought the guy was worth £60m and look at what has just happened to him, zaha is a player who does something half decent once every 30 games, ojo, Wilson and woodburn are far more deserving of a chance than he is, he had his chance at utd and blew it imo, stay well clear.

5.) 23 Dec 2016 08:03:43
Not a big fan of Zaha but how is Woodburn a better player than Zaha. Lol for god sake Woodburn is a kid. Zags plays for the first team.

{Ed001's Note - seriously? That is no reflection of quality. Coutinho couldn't get in a very poor Inter team when Zaha was a first choice player, does that mean Zaha is a better player than him too? Judge players on their own merits, not on silly notions like that. I would choose Woodburn over Zaha every single time, because he offers more quality on and off the ball. He is not as quick and strong, but he is not a headless chicken fond of putting a ball in row Z like Zaha.}

6.) 23 Dec 2016 08:31:35
No complaints there Ed01. Academy over any other player.

7.) 23 Dec 2016 09:32:53
Zaha reminds me a bit of Djibbrl Cisse - he's got the speed and the ability just lacks a calm edge to his game.

8.) 23 Dec 2016 11:24:23
The only player who reminds me of Cisse is Joey Barton.

9.) 28 Dec 2016 01:21:36
Woodburn is already good enough for the first team.

He is also hopefully going to improve for the next 10 years when players are reportedly at there peak.

What a prospect, and I'm sure he's at the right club to let him develop.

Klopp said he'd leave him alone until Woodburns quality (not age) and form make it impossible to ignore him.

Sound judgement.




Mag_ic786's banter posts with other poster's replies to Mag_ic786's banter posts


21 Jun 2017 05:13:27
I know we've only signed salah so far. But I can really see us kicking on next season, klopp has added belief to our team which we've not had In a long time.
We had a Suarez under Rodgers but he was the main man, carried the whole team. It's different this time we don't have one man we rely on, and the squad was thin last season so we struggled at times.
With klopp now added players to fill the gaps of last season (I trust him to add the right players) I can see a better title challenge, we may not win it but I don't think we will be so far off the pace.
If we can add 2 first teamers preferably in defence. And perhaps another attacking player to strengthen our options we should be just fine.


1.) 21 Jun 2017 08:18:18
Just to let you know, We have only signed solanke, salah isn't a liverpool player yet!

2.) 21 Jun 2017 08:45:53
have we seen solanke lean yet though?

3.) 21 Jun 2017 13:31:24
Nobody has 'signed' yet, that won't happen until July 1st at the earliest! ;)



06 Jun 2017 19:54:17
What's all this fuss about mbappe! Not seen much of him apart from YouTube with normally overhypes a player.
Yes he has skill and looks a clever player but seriously £100m plus? Has nobody learnt from the mistake Man U made with martial, he's a kid.


1.) 06 Jun 2017 20:35:30
Not may clubs will be able to afford Mbappe but whoever wants to sign him will pay dearly.

The money which UTD paid for Martial will seem like petty cash compared to what Mbappe's contract and transfer fee will cost.

{Ed025's Note - hes miles better than martial though max..

2.) 06 Jun 2017 20:46:50
I agree with the ed 025 . He's only 18 and he's rip Europe apart he could become one of best players in the world one day ( 5 years.

3.) 06 Jun 2017 20:56:23
Basically good players will only get more and more expensive. If VVD had another good season with Southampton next year he'd be well out of our price range. So like it or not, sometimes you just have to bite the bullet and cough up.

4.) 06 Jun 2017 21:04:22
Ed025, the kid is only 18. One way of ruining his career is to make him the highest paid youngster in the world ever and let him carry an exorbitant price tag at that age. It is ridiculous what clubs are doing to to some of their young players.

You just need to look at someone like Markovic. One of the highest rated young players before we signed him and is heading for a scrappy career. There are so many examples of high profile young players being left to the vultures.

Good luck to the lad.

{Ed025's Note - no argument from me max, but as me and jonny skies were just saying he could be rested for all cup games and even a few easier league games and studge could fill in for them....get shut of that klopp and i will sort your side out mate.. :)

5.) 06 Jun 2017 21:38:25
As if there is this guarantee that Mbappe will just walk into the next team and fart with it smelling like fresh flowers?

Kid that young going to the dentist for a mouth full of gold plated teeth.

Again, good luck to him.



03 Jun 2017 01:53:17
Morning reds
In my opinion salah is a very good buy if we get him. He said proven at a high standard in the champions league and in Italy.
Yes his spell at Chelsea was poor but he had limited chances and mourinho doesn't get the best out of his attacking players that's for sure.

I believe klopp sees firminho (who I rate highly) as his front man, salah and mane on the flanks and coutinho through the middle. However I feel we would still be short of back up, I'm still not convinced origi is a game changer and don't know much about solanke. And with the afcon we'd need another winger in at least.

Add a couple of defenders and we aren't looking like a strong unit. In an ideal world sturridge can stay fit cause he is class.

We don't need the big marquee signings klopp doesn't work that way, plus prices have gone crazy so we can't afford them.

Bring on next season YNWA.




22 Jan 2017 16:44:58
Many posters and the eds hurled abuse at the so called fickle Liverpool fans who said we need to buy, they were refuted and told you don't buy a player to replace one leaving for 5-6 games (mane) .
At the time I agreed but these last 3 weeks has swayed me. If you are real or Barcelona then no you don't as u already have world class back up. and once the said player returns you would have an extra player not really needed.
However at a club like Liverpool, a top 6 team trying to break into the top we could and should of bought, and even when mane returns the bought player would be needed in and around the squad.
Having said that I'm pretty sure klopp won't not buy in January just for the sake of not buying in Jan and being different. So perhaps he just couldn't find the right signing yet.

From the position we were in Dec. this has been the mother of all h ups. Nothing short of a 10 game winning run can put the title challenge back on track.
And I don't care if I sound fickle or am seen as a moaner or glass half empty. that's your opinion just as the above is mine. I'm a realist, simple as that.
We have the squad manager and money to build on our pre Christmas position but have failed thus far. And that is very disappointing to see, and we've seen it year in year out. We saw it with Benitez, with Rodgers and again this year so far.

Supporters of the bigger teams will understand what I'm saying. If you support Everton you'll think we should be happy to have a chance of top 4.


1.) 22 Jan 2017 17:50:10
I have gone through the same turnaround as you.

I thought Klopp had enough faith in our youngsters to be able to do a like for like with OJo or Woodbury when Mane was out. Unfortunately, it would appear that Klopp thinks they're not ready.

That being the case, I would've championed for buying in order to avoid the sort of blip we have had.

It may be that we can recover and still be in the mix come May, in which case no harm done. Or it may be another 'if only' which would be heartbreaking to take again.

2.) 22 Jan 2017 18:08:21
i agree with you, Klopp has had all season to sort this out and he has not, no matter what he thinks will work it has not, to get beat by a team who is struggling we let them have 3 shot on target and thy score with those 3, if they would have had more on target they would have scored more, all season we knew we would need to replace Mane, and if he was not going to buy then instead of losing lallanas energy in midfield he loses it by putting him out wide, why could he not have had one of the young players come in and do the job, might not have been as good as Mane but we would not have lost lallanas energy in midfield, plus the experience the younger player would have got would have been very good for him,

the real worry though is our defence, to let any team score with every one of their shots on target is so wrong and has to be stopped, other wise we will nothing, at the start of the season every one was saying we had a good chance of winning the prem because we had no european games, but to tell the truth our team looks in bad shape they look shattered and that is because klopp was moaning at how many games we had to play in a week, what he does not realise is that other teams also had to play but their managers never moaned which seems to have gotten to our players who look so tired, if we are going to keep in the top 4 we need to use our youngsters other teams are doing it, also fot anyone that disagrees with me tell me who is going backwards and who are going forward

3.) 22 Jan 2017 18:08:25
I'd like to think Man U will get a point v Chelsea. We will beat them and so will Arsenal and then it's back on.
The problem is we'll beat Chelsea then lose against lesser opposition

4.) 22 Jan 2017 18:24:33
Blaming klopp isn't right in my opinion. He's come to a team with one top player, by top I mean would make it into the team of the big 3-4 in any of europes bigger league

He inherits a injury prone striker, a retired captain in gerrard and a sloppy hopeless defence. The rest of the squad were average, or had at least been playing at an average level for the past season.

He's on course for target 1 which is to get us back in champions league. one step at a time.
My earlier post is just expressing my annoyance at once again wondering what could have been.

{Ed002's Note - Another few years in transition with all the funds he needs and I am sure Liverpool will get back in the Champions League. You have no grasp of the clear target the club has.}

5.) 22 Jan 2017 18:52:28

do you not agree we are not winning and dropping points once we go in front, are you sure we can hold onto a lead of 1-0 im not, and that is the worry, other teams around us are not dropping 2 points as they can hold onto a lead, they are not going backwards but forwards and above us they are winning games when they are not playing well because they can defend were as we cant, so while klopp has been here he has not improved all of the team, other managers have got onto how we play and how to hold out against us look at the swansea result, we are dropping points and position in the prem so i would not say we our on course for our target of the champions league because of all those points we have dropped from winning positions just because the other team we are playing runs at us and we lose our bottle, its happened for years

6.) 22 Jan 2017 22:12:50
I agree mbrock.
It's annoying but it's a work in progress, klopp has improved us that can't be denied. But our squad depth has been highlighted with the injuries and players leaving.
We have a soft centre and cave in too quick. Keeper defence and midfield is missing something. We have a leader in firminho up front he fights and shows the rest how it should be done. we need a similar personality in the defensive side of our game.



29 Dec 2016 21:42:43
I find it strange posters on here keep pointing out we have 5 attackers already plus youth so don't need anyone else. If klopp ends up signing another attacker then it's cause he needs another one and he know better than us.
all it takes is one injury and one to be off form and your bang in trouble.

Utd have depay mata ibrahimovic rooney young mkhitaryan and then rashford martial and lingaard on the bench who all have international caps and senior squad members.
Man City have sterling nolito aguero navas debruyne sane silva and iheanacho.
Chelsea have Moses oscar vanginkel batshuayi costa hazard Pedro and willian.
Arsenal ozil Ramsey giroud oxlade Sanchez wallcot welbeck and a few more.

These are our main rivals at the top of the table and their attackers comfortably outnumber ours.


1.) 29 Dec 2016 21:59:50
Thank the lord someone else can see it. We are really short compared to rest of top teams excluding Spurs.

Mane goes then sturridge gets injured and coutinho return get put back again. What do we do then?

{Ed001's Note - funny how you conveniently skate over the fact that a large number of those players listed are inexperienced youngsters who are being given chances, such as Rashford, Martial, Lingard, Iheanacho and Batshuayi. They may have international caps, but so does Harry Wilson, so how does that matter?}

2.) 29 Dec 2016 22:08:09
Magic, I think you'll find Chelsea have sold Oscar and Moses plays right back. Van Ginkel is very much on the same sort of level as Ojo or Ejaria anyway. So if you want to say we only have Coutinho, Firmino, Mane, Origi and Sturridge; realistically the only players you can count at Chelsea are Hazard, Costa, Pedro, Willian and Batshuayi.

Have you considered a) that we don't have any European football and don't need a squad as large as City, United or Arsenal? And b) that having a smaller squad improves team harmony/ spirit, and makes it easier to keep everyone happy and in form?

In case you missed it, we are above all the teams who have more attackers than we do. Arsenal may have a lot but they have a lot of poor players. Walcott, Welbeck and Chambo are just sprinters, Özil is the laziest player I've ever seen, Ramsey is a cripple who rarely gets into any sort of run, and their most under rated striker (Giroud) never plays because Wenger wants Sanchez up front. Arsenal are fortunate that Bellerin and Sanchez are so good going forward that it offsets how average the rest of their options are. If either of those two is missing they look like a skeleton team. My point here is that simply having numbers is not the answer. Quality over quantity. Or perhaps you want another Pongolle/ Babel/ El Zhar/ Assaidi/ Aspas etc?

Coutinho is back soon, Sturridge and Origi look good and Firmino is still good on the pitch! So if Mane is off for 3 games, I think we can get past it. If Ojo, Ejaria, Woodburn or Wilson have to cover as subs, I'll live with that!

Where I do agree with you is that if Klopp thinks he needs some more options, then I will fully support him in that decision. Personally though, I don't think we are exactly lacking firepower. Coutinho went out and Origi scored 5 in 5. Origi hit a bad patch in the last 3 games, and Sturridge comes off the bench to be heavily involved in goals against Everton and Stoke. Firmino is just Firmino and Mane will pick up where he left off in February. Don't panic buddy!

{Ed001's Note - Ozil lazy? Nonsense, he covers more ground than almost every other player in the Prem. He is not lazy, he just is not there to track back, that is not his role in the side.}

3.) 29 Dec 2016 22:51:50
UTD, Chelsea, City and Arsenal have enormous wealth to afford a Titanic full of players. We don't have enough with us. A wide player might come but not in January I guess.

4.) 29 Dec 2016 22:35:21
Apart from our boys ed lad 😉

But to be fair martial and bats are worth 70 odd million. If we signed a good young player and played him then for me its just a young player doesn't have to actually come from our youth academy, even though its nice.

5.) 29 Dec 2016 23:00:26
I think he just frustrates me Ed because there are times in games where he could make things difficult for the opposition and he simply chooses not to. I know it is not his job per se, but when you watch a player like Lallana or Firmino week in week out who are so selfless, then see Ozil not making the same selfless defensive efforts it just pales in comparison. Lazy is probably the wrong word. He does move a lot which is why he at times links play so well. It is just his absolute refusal to put in a tackle when the chance is there which frustrates many of my Arsenal supporting pals. Perhaps a lack of aggression is a better way of describing it?

I also think his creativity is massively exaggerated. He is branded as the king of assists, yet he can't even touch Milner or Henderson in this respect over the last 12 months. He just comes across as a luxury player at times who only shows up when the game is going well. If the going gets tough he shrinks away. I will admit though that I only watch Arsenal when they play us, or when they are on in the background in a pub. So perhaps I just haven't watched him closely enough to fully appreciate him.

I still don't think Arsenal's attack is anything like as good as it is cracked up to be. I think in Sanchez they have the best forward in the league and in Bellerin they have arguably the best attacking right back in Europe. These two guys make most of the decisive runs that actually carve teams open. Without them, Arsenal are pretty average offensively. They tend to get away with it though because they have a very solid defence, excellent options in the deeper midfield positions, and still in my opinion the best keeper in the league.

{Ed001's Note - Ozil is the most creative player in the Prem, it is not his fault he was creating chances for Giroud to miss.}

6.) 29 Dec 2016 23:06:26

We signed a young keeper and is now struggling bad. Not all young ones go on to become Coutinho.

7.) 29 Dec 2016 23:10:12
I'll have to humbly disagree there Ed001! I think Ozil is very creative when his team are on top and the opposition are all over the place. However if he is faced with any sort of challenge, everything I have seen of him suggests he whys away from the test and just fails to deliver. I wouldn't have him anywhere near any Liverpool team in my lifetime. I think he is occasionally world class and consistently disappointing!

{Ed001's Note - I never said I would sign him for us, that would be pointless as he would not fit, but that does not stop him from being a top class player. He never failed to deliver when Germany won the World Cup, which is the biggest test of all. So I will have to agree to disagree. He is not a blood and thunder player, but that does not stop him being brilliant.}

8.) 29 Dec 2016 23:25:07
MK, I agree with your post overall BUT to say that Ozil is lazy is way off mark. He is to me, the one player of a certain group (he, Iniesta, Firmino, Modric, Kroos etc) that make football look easy. He is simply too talented for his own good.

As for creativity, he is world class and I know he doesn`t do a job defensively nor track back as he can be bullied off the ball at times BUT he is one of the players that I would want in my team any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

9.) 29 Dec 2016 23:26:52
For me De bruyne is the most creative with assists and goals scored.
The complete player for me.

10.) 30 Dec 2016 00:14:34
The reason why I include batshuiye and martial is cause if any club pays that sort of money for a player. he could be 12 yrs old for all I care, he's been signed for the first team and should be counted as such.
rashford and lingaard are miles ahead of the Liverpool youngsters in terms of first team and international games and are squad players. not youth players.
We had a bench of youth for 3-4 games, none got anywhere near the pitch in the premier league cause they are not ready. If rashford/ lingaard were on our bench they'd be thrown straight on.

We have 5 first teamers and a bunch of kids, we are not strong enough, had we had that extra 2 players to help cover our losses we would have more points.

This is exactly what happened on this forum when klopp was signing midfielders in the summer, everyone was moaning, but turns out klopp was right then too.
And finally just cause all those other teams have money to burn, it don't mean we can't have an equal squad size, all it means is we can't spend as much on each player. and as klopp has proven with matip klavan milner (left back) . it's not all about who spends the most. If your still in doubt, just ask Leicester.

11.) 30 Dec 2016 00:33:44
Oh and to say ozil is lazy. is just taking the mick, he is a top class player and would make any team including Barcelona and Madrid.
It's so easy to say xy and z are rubbish or just speed merchants, but whether we rate a player or not is not what we are debating here. Those players we call rubbish are first team players or at the least squad players, the managers for their respective teams deem them good enough.

12.) 30 Dec 2016 01:03:22
MK love your posts more than most on here ( great to hear your little one and Mrs are home) but early in this thread you say Arsenals defence is solid, only 2 less goals conceded than us.
There are only 3 teams with a markedly better defences than ours Chelsea, Spurs and Southampton and we're ahead of 2 of them.
It's as if everyone jumps on a bandwagon.
Chelsea two man team
LFC great going forward crap defence.
mcfc " " " " ".
Arsenal will implode in the run-in.
Spurs. " " " " " ".
Our defence is conceding about 0.25 goals per game more than the top 6 average.
Yet our attack is averaging 0.5 more goals than the top 6 average.
Happy days, i know what I'd pay to watch.

13.) 30 Dec 2016 01:08:46
Talking about players availability, I read in BBC that Firmino's hearing will be on the same day of the Chelsea game. Is there a possibility that he will miss the game?

14.) 30 Dec 2016 01:21:11
In what universe outside of China is Martial worth 70m?

15.) 30 Dec 2016 08:38:53
Marco there is no bandwagon, Chelsea have shown what can be done with both a potent attack and mean defence. If we had a better defence we would not be six points behind them now we would probably be 6 in front of them.

I am not saying we cannot go on to win the prem but 2014 was a case in point if we want to draw parallels. It will be a tough ask and there will be a few twists for us and them. But we will put pressure on them by beating city tomorrow and sunderland on Tuesday.

16.) 30 Dec 2016 08:52:00
Sigh, all you've done is mention as many players as you can to suit your agenda!

Utd - Rooney is sh@t, lingard is 23 and been in their youth setup for years and only just getting a chance now, depay is a huge flop they're trying to get rid of and rashford is a youth player no-one had heard of who was a given a chance when the chips were down (fair play he took it) . By the way how is all of that attacking depth working out for them? I think they currently sit 7 points short of us no?

City, can't argue with that except I would put ihenacho in the same boat as rashford, why can't that be ojo?

Chelsea - oscar has been sold and not used, Moses was a joke until this season and cannot be included as an attacker given he's playing RB, van ginkel is in loan somewhere and you should check how many appearances he has for Chelsea, I'm pretty sure it's meagre.

Arsenal i can't argue with except for Ramsay who is not a front 3 player or he's a tenuous one at that.

if I took your approach of kitchen sink then we have Mane, sturridge, firmino, coutinho, origi, ings, (that's 6 so far you can't argue with and don't give me they're injured a lot tripe if you've included wellbeck, ox, wallcott) . On top of those 6 we have lallana, wijnaldum (AM until he joined us and certainly can play there), Milner can definitely play winger.

You must get my point, you're actually talking nonsense and have tried everything to suit your agenda of wanting a needless signing.

17.) 30 Dec 2016 09:33:46
Haizan - he will send his expensive high flying lawyer to represent him, probably plead guilty, get a ban and a fine.
He doesn't need to miss the game.

18.) 30 Dec 2016 10:06:41
87 red. I feel your missing my point, whether we rate them or not is not important. Rooney is on 250/ 300k a month, yes I think he's crap but fact is he's a first teamer so he goes on the list.
The whole basis of this was to say 5 senior attackers is not too many.

{Ed001's Note - and you have done that by completely fudging the point. You are completely missing the fact that a large proportion of those players are ranked as senior players purely because they got a chance due to their team not having 5 senior attackers. Why not give our younger players the same chances?}

19.) 30 Dec 2016 12:14:56
Thanks Ron!

20.) 30 Dec 2016 14:40:39
A Drunk Driving hearing does not take the whole day nor the whole day plus half of the evening. The Chelsea game is at 8pm so Firmino can have his hearing and still start the game so he`ll be fine.

As for our defence, drawing parallels with 13/ 14 is doing a disservice to how improved our defence is under Klopp. In 13/ 14, we were conceding 12 shots per game. this season it`s 7/ 8 at best. That season, Migs never played in front of a defence or defensive system where for long spells in games, he had strictly NOTHING to do. This season in an away derby vs Everton, he had NO save to make. That season, we couldn`t defend a set piece to save our lives. This season, we don`t even concede them and when we do, we are defending them much better overall.

What am I saying in essence? I`m saying that goals coal conceded and lack of clean sheets (trust me, I want them too), do not tell the whole story of how our defense has improved steadily under Klopp.

The goals we concede are a collection of mistakes (including those of the GK) that lead to them so again, Klopp is right that when we concede, it`s not just the GK`s fault all the time. See Stoke`s goal for an illustration.

Comparing us defensively to Chelsea, is a fool`s errand cos they already have that culture of defensive soundness from Mou`s first days and the 3-4-3 is a more defensive formation so it is a perfect storm for them. We don`t play that way and we defend by actually attacking you relentlessly and dominating possession so the opposition lives on scraps. We`ll be fine.

21.) 30 Dec 2016 16:14:41
Sorry to drag this up again, but i completely agree with the stance that whilst Ozil isn't lazy per se he doesn't always get involved where he should. I've watched Arsenal play a considerable amount of times over the past couple of years and find him to be absolutely infuriating to watch. I also thought he was really poor during the majority of the world cup games too, and remember a few of my german colleagues calling for him to be dropped. He's a luxury player who's reputation definitely precedes them.

22.) 30 Dec 2016 16:39:38
Eds001 I totally agree let's give the youth a chance. But for some reason klopp chose not to, so if he doesn't rate them as ready. then we must buy because coutinho injury mane going away and Sturridge injury leaves us paper thin.

{Ed001's Note - or it forces him to give them more chances....}




Mag_ic786's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

20 Jun 2017 18:11:11
It's Mohammed salah, not momo. He's a Muslim and I know many people take offence to the abbreviation of the name Mohammed, Jesus, Moses, Abraham etc. basically any holy names.




Click To View This Thread

12 Jun 2017 02:17:55
If he's as good as eds says he is then why not overspend
The likes of Chelsea city Utd have all been there done that to build their squads. We need to catch up somehow. Then once we have a strong set of players and a hopefully consistently challenge for top 4. we can attract some of the best.




Click To View This Thread

12 Jun 2017 02:14:50
No chance. We can't pay that sort of money. especially on a teenager who may not become what we all expect.




Click To View This Thread

10 Mar 2017 10:55:47
Cafu was amazing.




Click To View This Thread

29 Jan 2017 11:59:44
Lucas, can, ejaria, Stewert, grujic are all not good squad player quality. Nothing more.
We buy if we must, and move a few on in the summer. I keep seeing the eds tell us our squad is overloaded with midfielders, and with strikers, and with centre backs. but then I'm told our squad is thin, therefore it must be thin of quality. So we must add quality





Mag_ic786's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

21 Jun 2017 00:23:34
Wiji is solid and more reliable than can. I can see them perhaps sacrifices can to free up some funds and room in the squad. Although I rate emre but still young and inconsistent.
Best case he stays and fights for his place.




Click To View This Thread

13 Jun 2017 22:57:18
By the time the next afcon comes along I'm sure we will have strengthened further and have plenty cover.




Click To View This Thread

05 Mar 2017 10:33:46
Surely somebody from within the club has also realised we are losing to the 'lesser' teams and coach the players to play to not lose.
that would be a start right?

Also the issue is the lack of space. that still doesn't explain why the doors open at the back and each of these lesser teams score with every attack. Why are the bigger teams not having same effect on us?




Click To View This Thread

28 Jan 2017 13:30:11
Yes big win for wolves. This is becoming a disaster our season may be over once we've played Chelsea Arsenal and spurs




Click To View This Thread

26 Jan 2017 22:21:30
Now I've heard it all.