Liverpool rumours 68502

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.



30 Jun 2025 08:11:24
Morning all,

I won't post % as that seems to make some posters very upset.

But as of today all signs indicate a high probability that Marc Guehi will be an LFC player next season.

Agree23 Disagree0

30 Jun 2025 09:09:07
I'm seeing stories that they are interested in taking Doak in the other direction which could help grease the wheels.

30 Jun 2025 09:28:27
Doesn’t upset me one iota Arne. Crack on ?.

30 Jun 2025 09:32:29
Newcastle were very interested in Guehi last transfer window.

Maybe Hughes is trying to add a sweetener by getting Guhei and farming him to NUFC to get Isak.

Seriously though he is right footed, is paying in VVDs' position mostly. maybe as backup to VVD.

30 Jun 2025 09:52:40
It upset me because you can generally make a case for whatever you want to prove with statistics. All you need is a big enough sample base and a bunch of gullible people.

30 Jun 2025 10:22:44
I miss the percentages. They were your unique selling point. Bring them back.

30 Jun 2025 10:35:01
Yeah bring them back, id like to see a list of potential strikers to see if there are any suprise names on there. It's all gone a bit quite on that front.

30 Jun 2025 10:37:27
I was only 20 % upset.

30 Jun 2025 10:41:19
Think I read something like 63% of statistics are made up ?.

30 Jun 2025 11:29:21
Earnest - Just have a look at the odds on a bookies site and work out your % from there.

30 Jun 2025 11:51:12
I'd prefer ASH to compile the data.

30 Jun 2025 11:54:21
I'm 17.3% confident that there's a 50/ 50 chance.

30 Jun 2025 12:06:35
60% of the time percentages work every time.

30 Jun 2025 12:17:59
I'm 80% upset that there aren't percentages.

30 Jun 2025 12:33:22
Yes, RedQ. Anchorman references are always welcome here.

30 Jun 2025 13:38:42
I was 2% intrigued, 98% indifferent and 2% upset. But then I never did understand percentages ?.

30 Jun 2025 13:55:59
@Arne, I'd much rather see the percentages than a general comment in the future if you don't mind. At the very least we can all see that it is a theoretical prediction based on information gathered rather than inside knowledge from a specific source.

30 Jun 2025 14:03:36
It doesn’t upset me at all man. Crack on with it. I was just confused when you said it last time. Maybe just add context that you work for a bookies kind of thing next time.

30 Jun 2025 14:24:50
Any idea of what percentage of the posters was upset?

30 Jun 2025 15:34:14
Computer says "no"





 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass  
 
Change Consent