Liverpool Rumours Member Posts

 

RedQ's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



RedQ's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To RedQ's Posts

 

 

To RedQ's last 5 rumours posts

 

To RedQ's last 5 banter posts

 

To RedQ's last 5 rumour replies

 

To RedQ's last 5 banter replies

 

RedQ's rumours posts with other poster's replies to RedQ's rumours posts

 

10 Aug 2023 11:43:04
So we cannot stump up the extra for Lavia

Instead Skysports are reporting we have outbid Chelsea's offer of 80m for Caicedo.

What is going on in this transfer window.

RedQ

{Ed002's Note - Chelsea's offer is higher than £80M.}


1.) 10 Aug 2023 11:58:55
Dont get your hopes up, we are not paying 100m for Caicedo.


2.) 10 Aug 2023 12:02:23
So Liverpool's "offer" is higher than Chelsea's bid that is higher than 80mil? lol let the games begin!
or perhaps it's just the noise around the real transfer talk which of course we have no idea haha.


3.) 10 Aug 2023 12:03:17
I'd heard this too.

Obviously, I'd be more than happy with Caicedo, but do we really think this is true?

That'd be a huge swerve and why would we suddenly jump into the race for Caicedo all of a sudden? . Perhaps they just believe that there's no chance with Lavia now?

Again, I'm doubtful.


4.) 10 Aug 2023 12:10:30
Appreciated Ed002, i am unsighted to the details of the Chelsea offer etc. As mentioned i was stating what has been reported.

I guess my point was more, those negotiating transfers (Not FSG as many in the #FSGout movement seem to believe) wouldn't add a percentile to the Lavia deal to get it over the line, but will likely place a substantial amount more this close to the season opener to recruit Caicedo. (that is if reports are to be believed) .

If true it shows that actually the budget is there to spend should those negotiating wish to use it.


5.) 10 Aug 2023 12:18:04
Nightmare scenario is Chelsea get both!
It’s all very frustrating and I feel sorry for Jurgen.

{Ed002's Note - And Tyler Adams.}


6.) 10 Aug 2023 12:27:45
Chelsea do realise they can only play 11 players per game?

{Ed002's Note - Chelsea have sold a large number of players this summer and will be shipping quite a few out on loan to Strasbourg. They know what they are doing.}


7.) 10 Aug 2023 12:24:40
Ed is their business model that much better than ours mate? To spend that much snd pull in those 3 players after the likes of Enzo etc. Jesus how can we compete with that.

{Ed002's Note - It is not to do with business models it is about identifying players the club wants and acting responsibly to sign them. If Liverpool had not screwed up with Amrabat and Ugarte they would be in better shape.}


8.) 10 Aug 2023 12:35:48
Same old chelsea.


9.) 10 Aug 2023 12:36:58
ED:002 fair enough! and whilst you are hear thanks for keeping us up to date with all the transfer news!

I can assure you it is very much appreciated.

{Ed002's Note - You are welcome.}


10.) 10 Aug 2023 12:39:07
Unlike Liverpool I presume Ed002.


11.) 10 Aug 2023 13:14:43
It’s not a case of not having the £50m for Lavia (or willing to sign off on a £50m package) it’s Liverpool not valuing him at that amount. They may feel Caicedo for £90m and maybe different terms is better value.


12.) 10 Aug 2023 13:29:54
@Cobra, the right player at the right price - that’s been the clubs aim for the past few windows ….

Nice to see that ‘Chelsea know what they are doing’. Fined £8.5 m and back in the cross-hairs of the FA again. Seems the FA have a good idea of what Chelsea are doing too.

{Ed002's Note - You should begin your posts, "Speaking from a position of complete ignorance ....". TThe "fine" was actually a settlement - and it was Chelsea who declared the misdeclaration to the FA.

When you know nothing about a subject, it is best to say nothing and therefore avoid embarrassing yourself and the other Liverpool supporters.}


 

 

13 Jan 2022 09:56:25
Saw a mention in a player caler Musa Barrow this morning. I'm not entirely familiar with the player but the write up about being a versatile forward player who can pay off the wings and/ or through the middle seems to match the Klopp type player.

Do any of the eds know much of the player and whether there is any legitimate interest.

RedQ

{Ed002's Note - He is as you say versatile, typically a LW but can play as a striker. I am not sure how you decide if he is a "Klopp type player" but I would not hold your breath about a move to Liverpool. He will be at AFCON at the moment and I am not aware of any interest from Liverpool at all.}


1.) 13 Jan 2022 10:54:30
I've heard we've made enquiries about his younger brother "Wheel"; I think he's more in line with our transfer budget.


2.) 13 Jan 2022 11:58:02
I wound brother with his brother Wheel. They say he’s always tyred. Maybe he just needs a brake.


 

 

27 Sep 2021 23:18:39
Evening Eds, is there any news surrounding Trent not travelling with the squad to Portugal?

RedQ

{Ed001's Note - none just that he didn't go but had trained ok before that. So hopefully just a slight knock.}


1.) 28 Sep 2021 22:27:31
groin strain.


2.) 28 Sep 2021 23:04:19
Groin strain and klopp said he's not looking good for Sunday. It's why milner was subbed once the game was won.


 

 

10 Sep 2020 20:58:17
Good evening ed's and reds. Is there anything in Liverpool scouting Dortmunds young 17 year old AM Giovanni Reyes at all? Maybe not a move now but I was wondering what the opinion on the lad from Liverpool was as I have seen potential links.

Wishing everyone well in these mad times.

RedQ

{Ed002's Note - I know nothing of it, sorry.}


1.) 10 Sep 2020 22:51:16
not surprising they would scout him based on his skill set and progression over the last year. before anybody jumps down my throat I will also say that the fact that he's American has to be an attractive option to Liverpool just like Christian pulisic. Liverpool's not going to sign somebody based on where they're from clearly but if they have talent and also have marketing capabilities that seems to be like a win-win. as an American I'm just glad we finally have some Young bucks, who actually have skills and who are not playing in the toilet league that is MLS.


2.) 10 Sep 2020 23:23:07
Absolutely agree on the nationality not deciding but definitely influencing a decision. Take Minamino for example. Great player and in pre season has looked a step above what he was when signed. However, add on to that there really isn't many Japanese players at the top top clubs. His marketing for the club will push us in a direction not achievable before in japan.


3.) 11 Sep 2020 16:41:54
Hey Pete are you in Colorado too?


 

 

 

RedQ's banter posts with other poster's replies to RedQ's banter posts

 

21 Sep 2020 08:05:14
Ed's excuse me if i am not entirely correct with this list, however, with

GK: Kelleher, Grabara

Def: Gomez, Trent, Nico, Nat Phillips*

Mid: Hendo, Milner, Ox*, Jones,

Forwards: Brewster*, Wilson*, Elliot.

(asterisk marking players either linked in the media with a move or fans have suggested be sold to finance a non HG player move)

is there any plan by the club to fix the potential dwindling HG player quota? or is it more a case of don't believe everything you read. It would be interesting to know if the club are looking at bringing in any HG players.

Thanks for all your hard work and answers year round.

RedQ

{Ed001's Note - the club always looks at homegrown options before buying. We tried for one at left-back if you remember. It is just not that simple as there are only a very limited number of homegrown players and the numbers of good ones is falling rapidly with a lot of the better ones choosing to move abroad now. Players like Musiala will be English (well even that may change as he could choose to represent Germany) but potentially will not come into the homegrown category in the future. So the pot will dwindle still further and make the few good ones even more expensive. That is why the academy will become even more important in the future.}


1.) 21 Sep 2020 08:22:52
Ed001 thank you for the swift reply, i was just wondering as i'm not entirely sure on the ramifications of falling below the allotted quota. If the players touted for a move were to go, surely we would be dangerously close to breaking the rules set out and as such would receive the punishment.

I was just wondering as obviously Academy players would take time to blood through to a standard. Then money is obviously tighter with the current climate and HG players carry a premium. A high premium at that if they are of the wanted standard. Maybe there is a crop of ready made superstars waiting in the academy wings.

{Ed001's Note - there are no ramifications, you just have a smaller squad of players aged over 21. There are no rules stating you have to have them. It is not a quota. It is simply a space reserved in Premier League squads for homegrown players that cannot be taken up by other players.}


2.) 21 Sep 2020 10:09:17
Hi RedQ. If i am getting your question correct, below is my attempt to answer.

Out of the 25 available spaces in a squad. You need to have 8 reserved for the homegrown players, of which 4 should be club home grown like TAA, and 4 can be association home grown. Like henderson.

Now, remaining 17 can be non HG players. If you have more than 17, you will not be able to register all of them. Remember, 2 years ago, Juventus was not able to registet Emre Can for ucl games. The way our squad stands at the moment, we either need to sell some non HG players over 21 else we will have to exclude some of them while registerimg our squad.


3.) 21 Sep 2020 10:45:16
@Bullet. I'm sure the requirement for 4 of them to be club developed is only applicable to our squad for European games.

I'm pretty sure the EPL rules, are just 8 HG players. Players that spent 3 years before 21 years old playing in England and Wales.

{Ed002's Note - I answered this a couple of days ago, but again:

There are two things to consider and not to confuse:

(1) Home Grown: The EPL squad rules are a max of 25 players over 21, of which a max of 17 can be non-Home Grown. The remaining eight have to be HG (spending 3 years between 16 and 21 with an English or Welsh side, regardless of nationality, e.g. Nathan Ake is Home Grown for the EPL). If there are not enough HG players, then the squad size reduces, so if there are only six, the squad reduces to 23. In terms of UEFA competitions, the rules vary slightly with the eight "HG". A maximum of four of those eight can be trained by other clubs in the English and Welsh association. The remaining have to be club developed and trained. So If Arsenal were to recruit Mason Mount, he would fall in to the category of being association trained (by Chelsea) rather than club trained. Again, if there are not sufficient club trained players the squad size is reduced. So for Liverpool, Caoimhin Kelleher, Harry Wilson and Trent Alexander-Arnold are the three that meet this criteria so the squad size in Europe will be 24 rather than 25 (or 23 if Wilson is sold).

(2) Club developed: In terms of "club developed and trained" means that they have spent at least 12 months with the club before the year of their 19th birthday. As such Ryan Sessegnon is not club developed by Spurs nor Joe Gomez by Liverpool.

Non HG (19)
Adrian
Alisson
Andrew Robertson
Diogo Jota
Divock Origi
Fabinho
Georginio Wijnaldum
Joel Matip
Karius
Konstantinos Tsimikas
Marko Grujic
Mohamed Salah
Nobby Keïta
Roberto Firmino
Sadio Mane
Takumi Minamino
Thiago
Virgil van Dijk
Xherdan Shaqiri

HG (7)
Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain
James Milner
Joe Gomez
Jordan Henderson

HG and Club Developed (3)
Caoimhin Kelleher
Harry Wilson
Trent Alexander-Arnold.

Herbie Kane (CM) is HG and Club Developed but not listed in the First Team squad
Nathanial Phillips (CM) is HG but not listed in the First Team squad and is being sold}


4.) 21 Sep 2020 11:01:36
Ed and Bullet,

I think I have just had a long standing misinterpretation of the whole HG situation. For the longest time I believed that the HG ruling was a quota that clubs needed x amount of HG payers in the squad. Now having it explained in the terms that it's only an allocation of your squad taken for only HG player it makes sense.

Thank you for putting it into laymen's terms for my understanding. So basically if we were to sell a portion of our HG players the only backlash would be self issued in the sense of having a smaller squad for a more condensed season ahead.

{Ed002's Note - The club are over the limit for Non HG players that they need to reduce to 17. After that they can have up to 8 HG players. If they have only four, the squad size reduces to 21.}


5.) 21 Sep 2020 11:31:17
RedQ, when these rules first came in, Chelsea's eight homegrown players, for two or three seasons, consisted of John Terry, Frank Lampard, a reserve goalkeeper whose name was Turnbull I think, and five empty spaces.


 

 

30 Oct 2019 18:58:05
Are bookings cross competition? If so with Fabs on 4 for the season are we likely to see him play tonight and just happen to pick up a booking meaning the one game ban would be Villa and then he is a guarantee for the City game?

Or do you see Klopp as a risk taker and he will rest him for tonight and hope he can be on his best behaviour at the weekend? Fabs has been integral so far this season and I couldn't imagine us going up against city with out him in the 6.

RedQ

1.) 31 Oct 2019 01:00:26
I think that Klopp will tell Fabs to not take any chances and avoid that yellow card, we really need Fabs V man city, we have to win this match, more so while city are missing players . this game V man city is crucial, City win and they are closer to us, we win and the gap gets bigger .


 

 

30 Oct 2019 13:42:53
Are bookings cross competition? If so with Fabs on 4 for the season are we likely to see him play in the 6 tonight and just so happen to pick up a booking meaning he would be out of the Villa game but a guarantee for the City game?

or is Klopp a risk taker and he will rest him this evening and just hope he is on his best behaviour on the weekend? With Fabs being integral in the 6 this season thus far, it would be a major blow if he was out of the City game when it would be easily avoidable.

RedQ

1.) 30 Oct 2019 14:13:46
What will happen will happen. I hope he doesn't deliberately pick up a card because it's the definition of cheating. Hendo can play at 6 against City if needed. It's a collective sport- Ox, Gini and Hendo can do a job against City at Anfield.


2.) 30 Oct 2019 15:04:02
I'd prefer Hendo than ox for the security of the midfield. Ox may pop in a good run or two but I don't fancy a Silva or KDB getting in on the space. Hendo frustrates me but he does a job well.


3.) 30 Oct 2019 15:30:51
We need Fab for City.


4.) 30 Oct 2019 16:04:28
@LRG: considering the last few times Ox played against City we won, and all our matches against them after that without the Ox resulted in a draw at best, I'd say a midfield containing Ox in it wouldn't be that bad a bet.


5.) 30 Oct 2019 17:10:14
In all fairness we need fab for BOTH prem games in my opinion. Villa ain't no gimmick or guarantee we will win, what's the point of him deliberately miss the villa game if we end up dropping points and hoping he makes a bigger impact for th city game. don't play him tonight he needs a lite rest, play him at villa saturday and what will be will be. If we cruising and he hasn't picked up a yellow bring him off then but its pointless prioritising games when we don't know any outcome.


6.) 31 Oct 2019 01:04:09
I agree, Fabs has to play against Villa, its still 3 points, I still think City will drop Points soon, another draw maybe .


7.) 30 Oct 2019 01:03:09
Personally, I would play Ox vs City cos based on visual evidence in the games he has played against them, he is unplayable. He is able to break the lines and attack that soft under-belly down the middle. But that's just me. Klopp will play Hendo cos well, he is fully trusted by Klopp to do the job he is asked, whatever the job is. On the other side, Ox is a more than brilliant option to bring on.

But before any of that, our full focus should be on the Villa game cos if we don't win that, the City game becomes even more massive and complicated cos we will only have a 3 point diff. VILLA, first.


 

 

 

RedQ's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Aug 2023 19:52:05
Those muting Valverde's name about. Please please ask yourself why would Valverde give up Real Madrid to come to Liverpool.

I get if we as fans were offered the chance we would jump straight at it, as for many that was the dream. But even if we could afford the numbers it would take, can you honestly say you believe he would be interested?

RedQ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

10 Aug 2023 14:52:45
The posts are coming from sky sports reporting that Liverpool had outbid Chelsea for Caicedo. This was taken from a journalist surname Law (forgive me not knowing his forename) .

Fans, myself included, have taken this rumour reported and asked questions on a rumour page.

Sky sports have since retracted that report and replaced it with Liverpool have made contact with Brighton.

This Liverpool-rumours page wouldn't be much if fans of the team couldn't come here with a rumour they had heard.

RedQ

{Ed002's Note - Matt Law.}


 

 

Click To View This Thread

10 Aug 2023 12:10:30
Appreciated Ed002, i am unsighted to the details of the Chelsea offer etc. As mentioned i was stating what has been reported.

I guess my point was more, those negotiating transfers (Not FSG as many in the #FSGout movement seem to believe) wouldn't add a percentile to the Lavia deal to get it over the line, but will likely place a substantial amount more this close to the season opener to recruit Caicedo. (that is if reports are to be believed) .

If true it shows that actually the budget is there to spend should those negotiating wish to use it.

RedQ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

02 Aug 2023 13:54:48
Clearly Leeds have been told what Liverpool value Phillips at, so surely they either agree with the valuation and pay up, or they disagree with the value and move on?

RedQ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

17 Jul 2023 17:13:49
If it would get the transfer over the line then I am all for it pessimistic dreamer!

RedQ

 

 

 

RedQ's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Jan 2024 20:43:47
Do we think he looke rejuvenated because he has managed to break the news to the owners and players? Just clutching at straws but it must have been even more added stress and strain knowing what he needed to do for him, but not vocalising it.

Once he came to terms with what he needed to do and committed to it by telling those he needed to that stress lifted and he was a bit more rejuvenated.

I honestly don't believe the way and time it has come out was the plan. Rumours of the press potentially leaking it have forced the move.

I feel devastated but a happy devastated. Like I was devastated every season Liverpool under achieved before him. Gutted that we went years without being title contenders. I had never seen Liverpool finish top of the league and I don't think I ever would without him.

To work in the constraints he did in the early years. To turn last year round into this and leave us in a very strong position.

Fergie left an aging squad, Klopp saw the aging squad and made sure he sorted it out before moving on.

The man has single handedly bought hope back to the club and not just hope out of passion or love for the club. A genuine hope bourne out of belief.

What an amazing individual. What a set up he has.

He gave his heart and would to the city and the club. Whatever he does next I wish him and his family the absolute best in life.

RedQ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

26 Jan 2024 12:34:28
I thought I had been through heartbreak in my life.

Turns out I didn't even know what heartbreak was until this morning.

RedQ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

25 Jan 2024 09:40:45
I'm sure City fans were all saying the same when Vincent Kompany lined his strike up against Leicester, and look what that ultimately led to.

So long as we ultimately win the game, let just try and get his radar in.

RedQ

 

 

Click To View This Thread

23 Jan 2024 11:55:01
I personally believe that Joe should be kept at LB for the foreseeable.

I think he helps the inverted Trent role work better. My opinion only is that when Trent moves in and we go to the make shift back 3 Joe is a natural CB. Where as asking Robbo to move into a back 3 is a square peg in a round hole. We just look more assured defensively with Joe back there.

The tactical play of both wing back bombing on has developed into the new system. Which ultimately wouldn't suit Robbo.

I am glad i'm not Jurgen or Pep having to make such decisions.

RedQ

{Ed025's Note - dont worry about the fullback position RedO, joe will be injured shortly mate...after all he has played about 5 games now so thats his season nearly over i expect.. :)


 

 

Click To View This Thread

12 Jan 2024 07:51:19
Those claiming Trent is "Awful" at defending. Kyle Walker is suggested to be one of, if not the top defensive RB in the league. Trent outscores him in recoveries, tackles one and success rate.

Yes he is prone to an error, like us all. But get off the narrative and give your heads a wobble.

RedQ

 

 





Change Consent