Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

sutt's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team: Liverpool

Where from: salisbury

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



sutt's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To sutt's Posts



To sutt's last 5 rumours posts


To sutt's last 5 banter posts


To sutt's last 5 banter replies


sutt's rumours posts with other poster's replies to sutt's rumours posts


20 Mar 2017 22:43:35
Any views on Liverpool being interested in Luke shaw and Michael Keane?


{Ed002's Note - Nope.}

1.) 21 Mar 2017 13:45:58
A Manchester United player, and an ex-Manchester United youth player? Both of whom are currently average!

Shaw cannot get a game ahead of Rojo, Blind or Darmian which says everything I need to know. Maybe he is a future solution, but I am skeptical. I have never subscribed to his hype. He was a good young player with potential, now he is a guy in his 20's clinging on to a reputation after injuries and lack of development. He is a left footed Flanagan. Robbed of their potential careers, and now risks we cannot afford to put in our first team.

Keane is just not good enough though. Burnley pack their own box with 8 players in two disciplined banks of 4. At a top team where they will want to win more games, he will need to play in a far less rigid and far more expansive system which would see him brutally exposed in my opinion. Dyche is just a very good manager and a very good tactician. When you can get players like Keane, Mee, Barton, Hendrick and Vokes playing well in a top flight league, you are doing something right.

Some players at lower teams are good in spite of their surroundings (Gibson, Robertson etc) . Some look good because of their surroundings (Keane, Shawcross etc) .

2.) 22 Mar 2017 13:23:36
It's easier to play CB when you are set up defensively with 3 other defensive players in front of you. We saw how that worked out with Lovren who was great as Saints due to Koeman's defensive protection of his CB's and then when he came here where you are not as protected, he was poor and it has taken Klopp's management and coaching acumen to improve him. Players like Keane aren't good enough individually to play in our system cos our CB's are often exposed due to the way we play and if you can't defend one on one then, you are toast. Hence, CB's like Keane are a NO for me. Now Ben Gibson of Boro is a different issue. He would be perfect for us. Left footed CB, has pace, positional sense and can pass out of the back.




sutt's banter posts with other poster's replies to sutt's banter posts


16 Jan 2016 12:08:23
Would love to know why liverpool wouldn't go for Charlie Austin
English for one
Had a great partnership with danny ings
and a steal at 4 million
thats a guy who would be great at liverpool.


{Ed002's Note - A few reasons: (a) Liverpool has no interest in him whatsoever; (b) he wants to live and play in the south of England so any package to get him to play anywhere else would need to be very attractive; (c) Liverpool are overrun with strikers, even if they could unload Sinclair this month; (d) Liverpool has a very bloated squad with, after adding players grabbed back from loans and the addition of an unnecessary centre back, more than forty first team players to chose from; (e) money is an issue.}

1.) 16 Jan 2016 12:40:48
Maybe overrun with strikers
But let's buy one that could hit a barn door
Needs to trim the squad that doesn't have a future with liverpool.

2.) 16 Jan 2016 13:06:12
Or let's persevere with the injured one.

3.) 16 Jan 2016 13:23:23
Charlie Austin is not who we need.




sutt has no Rumour Replies



sutt's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

16 Jan 2016 12:40:48
Maybe overrun with strikers
But let's buy one that could hit a barn door
Needs to trim the squad that doesn't have a future with liverpool.