25 Jul 2017 21:02:17
Liverpool have put in a bid of 55m for van dijk.
25 Jul 2017 22:42:52
55m and a transfer ban coming up then?
25 Jul 2017 22:45:04
No they haven't.
25 Jul 2017 22:49:09
its just opening negotiation.
25 Jul 2017 23:12:08
If you really think Liverpool would be stupid enough to low ball Southampton after the mess they've caused. Think again. I do believe that VVD will be a Liverpool player in this transfer window but Liverpool will have to build a lot of bridges to make it happen.
26 Jul 2017 01:31:14
Thanks for the twitter update buddy.
26 Jul 2017 03:16:54
I mean I don't believe this for a second either way and I know what you're saying as we've handled everything appealingly but I find it extremely painful to read 55mill and low-ball in the same sentence that would make him the most expensive defender any Orem team has bought wouldn't it?
26 Jul 2017 09:54:30
There is nothing wrong with making a bid for a player nor is there anything wrong with that bid being low. In fact, that's generally how a negotiation works.
26 Jul 2017 10:25:24
Nothing wrong in bidding for a player. If the club want more for their player, they will reject it and ask the buying club to up the bid. Nothing new here.
26 Jul 2017 12:13:10
According to who David?
26 Jul 2017 16:19:08
CMK I know 55 million is an enormous sum of money and I'm by no means implying that is a small amount. You are correct it would be the highest fee ever for a defender but Liverpool putting a bid in of 55 million is pretty low given the circumstances. They should just pay the price being asked and stop pussyfooting around.
{Ed002's Note - They have not put in any such bid.}
26 Jul 2017 19:06:39
I know Eds. I was saying if they did it would be pretty stupid. Keep up the good work.