Liverpool Rumours Member Posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

Paypal single or recurring donation

(single word yields best result)

adamski94's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



adamski94's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To adamski94's Posts



To adamski94's last 5 rumours posts


To adamski94's last 5 banter posts


To adamski94's last 5 rumour replies


To adamski94's last 5 banter replies


adamski94's rumours posts with other poster's replies to adamski94's rumours posts


09 May 2022 17:56:36
Looks like Bayern want Mane.


1.) 09 May 2022 18:20:15
Just been reading this! I think he might leave new challenge for him your a old man at 30 these days in the EPL according to a few! I’d hate to loose him he’s been amazing a great signing but I’d not begrudge him a move!

2.) 09 May 2022 18:24:39
It would seem so. I wouldn’t be comfortable losing mane whilst city add Haaland.
We’d have to replace him if he wanted to leave. Lewa?

3.) 09 May 2022 18:47:30
Lewa is at the wrong end of his career, I’d rather we went for Darwin Nunez. They’d cost about the same and Nunez has more miles in the tank.

4.) 09 May 2022 19:06:54
Could be

Mane out Dembele in.

Not saying it is but Klopp is a huge fan and he can sign a pre contract now.

5.) 09 May 2022 19:24:10
What Bayern want and what Bayern get will probably be 2 different things.

6.) 09 May 2022 19:41:31
Well we have to be honest here lads mane won't be first choice on the left next season, if he wants a new contract he will want to match what salah gets (if he signs) I think now wouldn't be a bad time to let him move on and maybe freshen things up.

Im not really worried about haaland to city right now something screams out that haaland will be demonised with injuries and will he get much space to run in behind like he does at dortmund? I'm not sure but never be worried about who our rivals sign I'm sure interest in mane to leave isn't a shock.

Maybe gnabry in return?

We have to remember our club will have to be creative in how we replace our ageing players and trust that klopp has the right ideas in mind as always.

7.) 09 May 2022 19:45:24
Everything coming from the same source.

Apparently Mane and Gnabry share an agent too, reports about both players wanting new contracts recently and now a convenient rumour about a swap deal.

Maybe I'm wrong, but wouldn't be surprised if this is just the agent drumming up some rumours to help with contract negotiations for his respective clients.

8.) 09 May 2022 20:12:18
If Sadio left then we'd 100% be signing Darwin Núñez as a direct replacement.

9.) 09 May 2022 20:36:13
Jones, Mane out and Dembele in would possibly be the worst transaction since we sold Suarez and got Balotelli as a replacement. He’s an injury prone waster.

10.) 09 May 2022 21:07:08
Probably unlikely to happen die to the fee involved but Nkunku would be my choice as a Mane replacement, has the versatility to play across the front 3 and with him and Diaz we'd have 2 young players yo replace a front 3 that looked irreplaceable 2-3 years ago.

11.) 09 May 2022 21:23:36
Personally I don’t want to face the idea of selling Mane or Salah. But, realistically if it happened I think we should then go for Nunez and Bowen. Bowen is proven premier league quality, he’s quick, a good finisher, hard working, skilful with a great final ball, his decision making is good too. He’s got something like 10 goals and 10 assists this year and has improved year on year. Textbook signing for us.

Nunez looks the real deal to me, quick, skilful, physically imposing and scores goals. With Carvalho coming in too, we’d have decent options out wide with Diaz, Jota, Bowen and Carvalho, with Nunez and Firmino as central options.

12.) 09 May 2022 21:35:10
Yay, July is on the horizon 😁😁😁

Dembele, the new Bissouma.

13.) 09 May 2022 23:34:14
Is serge classed as homegrown ?

14.) 09 May 2022 23:41:40
Dembele is off to PSG with those other French wasters Pogba and Ntiti.

15.) 10 May 2022 04:45:41
Mane gets no respect on here. I'd sooner keep him than Mo.

16.) 10 May 2022 06:27:35
Isn’t the reason Gnabry is potentially leaving because of astronomical wage demands?

17.) 10 May 2022 07:57:04
Christian Falk just dismissed the Mane to Bayern discussion as not true. Rumour came from a bottom-feeder journo.

However, if Mane is going to want parity with Salah, he needs to be careful because the value of Salah is diminishing weekly at the moment.

I think Haaland is going to take time to settle and adapt to the Man City way of playing.

18.) 10 May 2022 09:39:54
Out of interest @StEt, how far has Salah’s value dropped and what was the starting value?

19.) 10 May 2022 09:40:02
Totally agree with Faithinworks…… I’d much rather Mane stay than Mo .
He deserves a lot more respect than he’s given sometimes .

20.) 10 May 2022 15:29:25
I have no idea what the starting value for Salah was because I am referring to his wage demands. This is the only topic we know there are definitely discussions over, so not a baseless rumour.

We also know that his salary demands are in excess of £300k per week.

If recent past performance is being used as a barometer for future performance, like it was being used by his toxic agent to push wage demands up towards £500k per week, then surely it should follow that poor performance results in a comparative decline in wage expectations, should it not?

I would say that post-AFCON his goals per game has dropped by almost 50%. Not so confident on his assist rate. Against Spurs his passing was far from creative and, dare I say, worse than Jota’s.

So I would like to see us counter Salah’s wage demands by £50k per week drop from his negotiation level.

But no. This is football. And Mo is untouchable. So we will have to pay the higher salary or he goes on a free at the end of next season.

I doubt very much Salah or his agent will concede to leave this summer for a fee when he can leave at the end of next season on a ridiculous salary and signing on fee. We cannot force him to transfer, the bargaining power is with the player, not the club, post-Bosman.

21.) 10 May 2022 19:11:09
Obviously I am a huge fan of both Salah and Mane, but Diaz coming in I think he shown us how those two used to be. Yes they are still very good but they are nowhere near as dynamic or direct as they used to be. Sad but true. That they both seemingly are entertaining the idea of leaving is all I need to be content with them being replaced. Personally I would like to see Raphina and either Bowen or Watkins come in. I just always prefer a player proven in this league to one from elsewhere.

22.) 10 May 2022 22:02:51
Mane as no9 has been revitalised.
I’d definitely keep him.
Rarely injured
Consistently scores.

23.) 12 May 2022 13:51:10
Must try to keep Mane, if we can. He has been great in the middle. Diaz on the left. Worked perfectly at Villa.

Salah we should sell ASAP. He is shaping to leave on a free in 12 months -probably already has something lined up. Not to mention he has turned into Balotelli. Five months of pure mediocrity.

Should be able to get 50 million for him. That should easily pay for Bowen, without the stupid wages on top.



17 Mar 2022 19:20:25
We are apparently interested in Rashford, can't see that happening.


1.) 17 Mar 2022 19:42:02
What for? Making sure all the players have a packed lunch?

2.) 17 Mar 2022 19:58:23
Proper coach would bring the best out of that kid. Remember he hasn't been coached properly in 3 years.

3.) 17 Mar 2022 21:08:56
And even if we were remotely interested in him, the odds of Man U selling to us are about a billion to one.

4.) 17 Mar 2022 21:16:55
Not saying we are or aren't SR. I'm saying he's a very good footballer who has been left to his own devices in a team with no direction and has lost his way. Klopp would absolutely revive him.

5.) 17 Mar 2022 21:19:42
You mean to replace Luis Diaz 🤣🤣🤣.

6.) 17 Mar 2022 21:31:55
It won’t happen but agree with OMM Rashford under Klopp would be lethal.

7.) 17 Mar 2022 21:31:55
It won’t happen but agree with OMM Rashford under Klopp would be lethal.

8.) 18 Mar 2022 00:06:55
Rashford has everything, he just needs the right home.
Besides the ManU - Liverpool thing I'm not sure we are a likely destination anyways as we have Diaz and Mane down the left. Not sure he would be a candidate for the #9 role the way we use it.

9.) 18 Mar 2022 09:00:00
Rashford is massively overrated for me and doesn’t even get on our bench.
Regardless of coaching if he had everything he’d be able to make a 5 yard pass and shoot vaguely near the goal.
Just another hyped up average English player.
Great bloke though off the pitch obviously.

10.) 18 Mar 2022 11:31:19
On one hand, Rashford is a top-grade human being. On the other, he’s an overrated ManU reject who will cost us an arm and a leg. No thanks.

11.) 18 Mar 2022 21:41:03
Oh mane mane. he is shocking. Bang average at very best. Don't even know a single United fan that rates him. hence his nickname Gashford. It it wasn't for feeding the kids and charity work, he'd be in serious limbo now. Every week he's being criticised for being lax lazy and uninterested in the game. He's just a poor player thrown in at the deep end when mourinho was struggling.

12.) 19 Mar 2022 01:18:36
I actually disagree. If klopp had gone to United I think he would have made rashford and martial as good as mane and salah.
I feel sorry for them, very talented players rotting/ rotted in a poorly run club.
I do how ever LOVE the fact united are terrible 😂😂. 1 down 3 to go👍.

{Ed0666's Note - I disagree mate I don’t think martial or RashFord had the ceiling Salah & Mane had. However I do agree Klopp would have made them better than they are now. I wouldn’t mind RashFord now tbh. His confidence and self esteem in tatters the fans hate him he’s push a move through to Anfield in a heartbeat. That would be the ultimate irony RashFord coming to us and winning things.

13.) 19 Mar 2022 08:48:18
Mcfly that is the best answer I’ve seen in ages.

14.) 19 Mar 2022 13:22:22
Rashford definitely improves us. And when I say us I mean our reserves. I’d imagine he would start most games for them.

15.) 21 Mar 2022 14:24:48
Rashford does not make our bench lads what you lot been smoking? Mediocre player and Man U is certainly his level.

16.) 21 Mar 2022 14:38:17
Great human being and a big talent once, but lost out through a lack of quality coaching and mentorship of junior players over last few years at Man Utd, and hard to recover that lost ground now. Would have been a far better for him if had been at Liverpool, City or Chelsea.



31 Jan 2022 23:33:41
Do you still see us signing Carvalho this week on a Pre-Agreement? Some journalists seem to think it is possible that we can still seal the deal for him to move in July that would guarantee Fulham a fee and we won't have to go to a tribunal.


{Ed002's Note - No, Liverpool cannot sign a pre-agreement before the end of the season.}

1.) 31 Jan 2022 23:52:32
Can we agree a deal, e. g as we have now but not officially go through and sign till the summer?

{Ed002's Note - No, he cannot sign a pre-contract with Liverpool. The rules are very clear.}

2.) 31 Jan 2022 23:52:47
*with a fee for Fulham.

{Ed002's Note - No.}

3.) 01 Feb 2022 00:06:14
As I have understood the rules, the issue is that he can enter talks with foreign clubs (Dortmunt etc) 6 months before his contract ends, but english clubs can not legally discuss terms more than one month before his contract runs out.

{Ed002's Note - Yes.}

4.) 01 Feb 2022 00:10:02
I'm really sorry for my ignorance on the matter Ed but is it not possible for us to bid for carvalho and then speak with the player? I thought the transfer window being closed didn't prohibit offers and contracts being discussed?

Sorry again I know you must get plagued with the same questions over and over!

{Ed002's Note - Yes, you misunderstand. There can be no agreements or discussions unless the clubs involved are from outside of England orWales.. I have answered this several times.}

5.) 01 Feb 2022 01:28:23
Yeah that's what I was meaning Westwood!

Cheers for the info Ed, disappointed not to get the transfer over the line but I do hope we act within the rules and get him in the summer. However I think he could have signed a a german/ Spanish club by that stage!

6.) 01 Feb 2022 02:04:32
Ed I think what the other guys are trying to say is we are going to have to agree a compensation fee with Fulham or go to a tribunal due to his age. It does seem like a ridiculous technicality that we could have talked to Fulham about it a few hours ago but now we can't.

It is just another case of English football cutting its nose off to spite its face, giving foreign clubs the advantage in player negotiations. Every other major footballing country allows players in the final 6 months of their contract to negotiate with whichever club they like. Liverpool aren't even in the same league as Fulham so it's not like there would be a conflict of interest in the league. Sorry for venting but the rules are ridiculous. I don't expect them to change soon because English football has always been reluctant to change. It took us decades of petitioning to get a winter break. I'd love to see us get rid of FA Cup replays and 2 domestic knockout tournaments as well but I won't hold my breath.

7.) 01 Feb 2022 09:33:50
Does anybody know exactly why it the transfer didn't go through, I thought the necko deal would have sweetened the pot for Fulham.

8.) 01 Feb 2022 06:12:04
So the moves we have seen from Spain and Germany these last years, with purchases done in February to April where the actual transfer won't happen until the window opens again are not possible between English clubs?

But English can do that with International transfers? i. e. if Liverpool were to buy Bellingham now for a transfer July 1st?

I am sure you've covered this before, but if this is impossible within the English league system, the difference between the countries are crazy and impossible to keep track off!

{Ed002's Note - No, there is no way for Liverpool to cheat the rules. It is simple.}

9.) 01 Feb 2022 10:07:48
I think the transfer was done and dusted and the paperwork was all in order.

The issue was that the loaning of Carvalho back to Fulham required separate paperwork outside of the transfer paperwork and this wasn’t completed.

As Fulham made it a condition of proceeding with the transfer that the lad was loaned back for the rest of the season the transfer didn’t proceed.

That seems to be what the more sensible elements of the press are saying, although I stand to be corrected.

10.) 01 Feb 2022 10:18:50
I wouldn’t put it past Ward and Edwards for this to have been part of the plan. Agree a deal late in the day, with little time to push through which makes a statement to the player we really wanted him. Also when Fulham agreed to our offer we would have been allowed to speak to Carvalho’s family on terms of the deal - player sets his heart on a move to us. Neco Williams sweetens the deal for Fulham putting us a bit more in their favour too.

Come May when we can speak to him we have a player who has his heart set on us so hopefully spurs other advances, won’t need to go to tribunal as we have already agreed a max fee already which Fulham we’re happy with and we could prob negotiate for us to get him slightly cheaper given Neco loan and as not 6 months left in his contract.

Maybe I have overthought this a little too much though 🤣🤣.

11.) 01 Feb 2022 10:35:13
It's all in the lads hands now. If he wants to play for Liverpool and Klopp as rumours say. He will wait and sign. If money talks in his head he will go to Spain or Germany. We will see. Let's now enjoy the rest of the season, let's enjoy our new lad Diaz and hopefully by the end of the season we I'll celebrate a trophy or two or even more hopefully. And let's all hope for a Salah deal!

12.) 01 Feb 2022 16:17:38
Agreed martolfc.



31 Jan 2022 23:16:21
Every media outlet saying the deal has collapsed, is this true?


{Ed0666's Note - yep no time to finalize everything. You can get a 2 hour extension per league rules?

1.) 31 Jan 2022 23:33:17
2 hours extension? How does this work?



30 Jan 2022 14:30:50
Sky are saying we are in talks to sign Carvalho from Fulham, can any ends confirm or deny?


1.) 30 Jan 2022 17:40:37
Ed0Barry here I can neither confirm or deny that Liverpool ARE in talks with Fulham 😉😁.




adamski94's banter posts with other poster's replies to adamski94's banter posts


01 May 2022 01:16:28
Looks like we will renew our shirt sponsorship for £80m a season which will be the most lucrative deal in football.


1.) 01 May 2022 12:32:36
we always just renew our deals first so its always “the most lucrative” until everyone else gets even more.

2.) 01 May 2022 13:07:54
The club’s brand value is certainly at a high but at the same time it’s still a difficult climate to do commercial sponsorship deals right now.

Curious to see what kind of deal (size and complexity) they actually pull off.

3.) 01 May 2022 13:56:22
If the numbers are correct, then it's double the current deal. I'm sure the commercial department is ecstatic, if they are able to double, every renewal.

4.) 01 May 2022 14:32:13
Not sure how difficult it is to do commercial deals at the moment as the super power companies seem to be posting record revenues.

5.) 01 May 2022 14:51:41
People will be doing well to top £80m beef. certainly on these shores!

6.) 01 May 2022 19:03:57
LFC have the highest selling jersey in world football. I can see why we’re asking for more money!



16 Mar 2022 16:30:14
Just a bit of a random question, with all the interest in people wanting to buy Chelsea do you see Liverpool getting a similar amount of interest of FSG were to put them up for sale? I'm really surprised by the amount of interest in paying around £3b for a team which is the same price FSG are rumoured to value us.


{Ed002's Note - If the club werte for sale it would be very similar.}

1.) 16 Mar 2022 22:40:19
3bn Ed? That’s some jump 300m to 3bn.

{Ed002's Note - I suspect Chelsea will sell for rather less than that and Liverpool would be worth about the same. You will know very soon.}

2.) 17 Mar 2022 05:26:50
Another hint for me to chase Ed. Is there interested parties looking to purchase LFC or have I taken your last sentence wrong young man?

{Ed002's Note - No - LIverpool is not being sold.}



08 Mar 2022 14:00:37
Are there any players in Ukraine or Russia that have been on our radar? I've seen Fifa saying that all foreign players in those countries can join any other club on a free transfer.


1.) 08 Mar 2022 15:11:23
This is a bit tone deaf mate. People are dying and you're wondering if we can take advantage.

{Ed002's Note - Liverpool cannot sign any of the players.}

2.) 08 Mar 2022 15:16:35
How come Ed?

{Ed002's Note - There is no space.}

3.) 08 Mar 2022 17:37:17
OP, really? Of all the horrible things happening to both peoples and this is what you’re thinking about? Seriously, Do better, bro.

{Ed014's Note - unbelievably thoughtless post by the OP

4.) 08 Mar 2022 18:02:21
To be fair to the op, he could be a kid.

5.) 08 Mar 2022 20:23:48
or he/ she could be thinking about trying to save those players from their situation.

6.) 09 Mar 2022 05:56:45
Stop virtue-signalling you lot. I swear some of the reactions on this site are so over the top by holier than thou posters. It's a fair question. Are we supposed to stick our heads in the sand to this situation? This IS a football site. Please can one of you inform the duration of time before it is deemed acceptable to ask this question?

7.) 09 Mar 2022 08:51:45
To the people on the high horses complaining about the post, would any of you criticise the club if they signed one of the available players? The answer is no. The guy is asking a genuine question on a Liverpool transfer rumour site. People need to wise up and stop getting offended by everything and anything.

8.) 09 Mar 2022 10:38:58
@Redjoe, stop presuming to answer your own question on behalf of everybody else.

Some people - myself included - would criticise the club if they were to sign players, managers, board members that chose not to condemn an unwarranted invasion of a sovereign state for no other reason than a geopolitical gain because they (the player etc) happen to be a citizen of, or a supporter of the invasion or mates with the rulers of the aggressor state.

Everybody has the right to an opinion. The thing is some people’s opinions are different and calling people names isn’t really a constructive way of presenting one’s opinion.

9.) 09 Mar 2022 12:23:47
WDW that's not the original question was about. The original question was whether the club might sign any players from either the Ukrainian or Russian leagues due to their free agent status. This goes for players of all nationalities so the question isn't about signing Russian players who refuse to condemn the invasion. People were triggered by this as apparently no one is supposed to acknowledge this situation despite FIFA making a statement on it. These players can continue with their careers once the posters on this site let them know it is acceptable to do so.

Also Redjoe didn't call anyone any names. You're kind of proving his point.

10.) 09 Mar 2022 14:07:37
He 100% just backed up my point BR

WDW I really don't think you have an understanding of the post or the situation. Maybe read up on it and come back with a response mate.

The reply or post was neither to do with anyone refusing to condemn what is going on in ukraine either. Have an opinion all you want but put the opinion in the right place. The OP was asking are we interested in any of the players that have the option to play for other clubs what is wrong with that?

Sadly we now live in a social media world where everyone has a right to be offended by everything and I have been reading this site for a number of years now and hope it isn't going down the same route.

People need to man up and like i said get off their high horses when they feel everytime is the right time to jump on a bandwagon. And before anyone mentions it I'm not having a go at people for supporting the poor ukraine people!

11.) 09 Mar 2022 19:15:20
Redjoe21, speak for yourself, lad. You don’t know what I would think nor do if the club decided to sign any of these players so don’t act like you do. Virtue signalling? Again, speak for yourself cos you know nothing about anyone on here except what you are told.

12.) 09 Mar 2022 23:08:12
@Babbity, where did I say my point was about the original post?

@Redjoe mentioned contributors to the thread (and by inference other threads) being on a ‘high horse’ whilst presuming to tell them what to think.

I don’t see where I resorted to name calling or telling Redjoe what to think. What I actually said was that people have their own opinions and that they can speak for themselves rather than have somebody speak for them. I apologise if that wasn’t clear and / or if I have caused any offence.

13.) 10 Mar 2022 04:23:51
WDW telling people they are on a high horse is not name-calling. You are very thin-skinned if you think it is. Also if your point wasn't about the original question, why make that strawman argument.

Oli red your point on virtue-signalling doesn't make any sense. If anyone is having a go at the OP, they are virtue-signalling. He asked a fair question and people want to jump on him about it to make themselves look morally superior to him. If they were actually as thoughtful and compassionate as they like to think they are, they would have done a better job at understanding where the OP was coming from.

14.) 10 Mar 2022 08:41:46
@Babbity, I have to admit that I don’t know what you are talking about now mate. I’m not sure what you criteria for thin / thick skin is or why it should matter as my espouse was based on the correction of a factual inaccuracy in the opinion Redjoe expressed about everybody’s behaviour should we sign a specific type of player.

The original poster asked a question about bringing in players from Ukraine / Russia on free transfers. Some people responded. Redjoe indicated that in his opinion some of the respondents had pretentious to morally superiority and that the same people would- again in his opinion - forego their principles if we signed (if it were possible, which Ed02 said it wasn’t) if we signed one or more of the players.

I replied that Redjoe’s opinion was incorrect - I, for one, would object if the situation arose.

I’m not sure why you keep rabbiting on (see what I did there) about me not responding to the OP - is it compulsory in a conversation that everything must refer to the original statement? I’m also not sure about what you are on about me putting up a strawman. Redjoe made a statement about the behaviour he would expect from everybody, which in my case (and I suspect others) was factually incorrect with specific reference to me and my behaviour.

Like I say, please accept my apologies if I have not been clear or have caused offence in anyway.

15.) 10 Mar 2022 10:40:16
No problem WDW. I probably got a bit defensive so I would like to apologise too. I just got annoyed at some of the early commenters jumping on the OP when he asked a perfectly inhocent question, at least it was in my mind anyway.



31 Jan 2022 21:52:26
Deal for Fabio Carvalho is agreed and we have an hour to sort the contract medical and get it submitted.


{Ed0666's Note - I think they are still negotiating I’m pretty sure there’s not a definite deal done but there’s a good chance it will happen.

1.) 31 Jan 2022 22:12:44
Can't wait for the lean lad's 😃👍.

2.) 31 Jan 2022 22:26:08
Fabrizio Romano has given it the 'here we go' so I think it's just matter of time constraints now. Over the moon with this signing and I'd be gutted if we couldn't complete the formalities. Sometimes when you see a player you just know, especially if it's a young lad that Liverpool have put all this effort into acquiring. You can't play as well as he has in the championship as a teenager without serious amounts of talent. Bit annoying we can't utilise him til the summer but an extra few months of first team football will hardly do him any harm. I have a feeling that, like Elliott and Gomez, this will be looked back upon as an absolute steal (fingers crossed) .

3.) 31 Jan 2022 22:41:41
Fee reported as agreed, medical and personal terms to sort out (quickly, lol) .
Come on you mighty reds.

4.) 31 Jan 2022 23:04:46
Looks like we're too late, unless it's reported after the window has closed which it has been now.

{Ed0666's Note - It’s done

5.) 31 Jan 2022 23:15:17
Fallen through apparently.

{Ed0666's Note - yep you’re right mate fallen through wasnt time to get everything done!

6.) 31 Jan 2022 23:21:49
Is it done? Sky reporting its off, deal sheet for the loan back to fulham not submitted in time?!

7.) 31 Jan 2022 23:20:37
Most journalists reporting paperwork wasn’t with the EFL before the deadline and they don’t do deal sheets. Is that not the case then Ed?

{Ed0666's Note - Don’t know mate the BBC said it was done then they corrected themselves and said it wasn’t



28 Jan 2022 20:38:45
Im guessing now Diaz is all but done our summer priority is to reconstruct our midfield? I can see us putting 3 or 4 players on the market (Ox, Keita, Thiago) and Milner will probaly leave or do you reckon they will make efforts to replace one of the front 3.


1.) 28 Jan 2022 20:53:09
man. take it easy for a day!

2.) 28 Jan 2022 22:07:47
I think and hope Carvallho of Fulham to arrive and a midfielder who will go straight into the team.




adamski94's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

30 Jan 2022 15:04:03
Paul Joyce and Sky saying we have made a bid.




Click To View This Thread

30 Jan 2022 14:59:03
Sky now saying we have bud £5m.




Click To View This Thread

25 Dec 2021 16:18:36
In regards to Salah and Barcelon you said if they moved it would require a player in exchange, is that Liverpool wanting a player or Barcelona wanting to offload? And who would it most likely be.


{Ed002's Note - They would offer a selection of players such as Coutinho and Dembele.}



Click To View This Thread

05 Nov 2021 08:26:40
Hopefully of we were to get a midfielder in it would be early in the transfer window instead of waiting last minute like we did last season with defenders.




Click To View This Thread

01 Nov 2021 21:28:31
Do you think there was any truth to what he said or is it his way of making the headlines?


{Ed0666's Note - no clue sorry




adamski94's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

30 Jan 2022 21:00:20
Brommers, a tribunal doesn't always pay more as im pretty sure Fulham wanted a lot more for Elliot then what they recieved.




Click To View This Thread

08 Jan 2022 14:58:07
Clarkson was recalled days ago, the player who was talked about was recaled in the last 24 hour.




Click To View This Thread

11 Dec 2021 12:40:46
Wasn't the other player sold to Fulham by accident? Or was that a totally different player.


{Ed001's Note - no he was part of a deal to buy one of their players iirc.}



Click To View This Thread

30 Aug 2021 22:33:02
But you didn't say whether we would sign someone tomorrow or Jan though 🤣🤪.




Click To View This Thread

25 Aug 2021 23:17:55
Hopefully we will get Sheriff Tiraspol on their group stage debut.