Liverpool Discussion posts


Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

Paypal single or recurring donation

(single word yields best result)

22 Oct 2021 12:05:53
Thought with the man City fan in a coma after being attacked after the bruge match, hope he recovers soon.

Agree3 Disagree0

22 Oct 2021 14:34:06
Absolutely mate. Hopefully the poor fella makes a full recovery.

22 Oct 2021 00:57:54
Hi folks. I know he’s a wrong ‘un because of his Manc past, but he’s spoken really well this week about the unjust stresses that football brings, so if anyone with a season ticket wants to start a ‘he’s got a head like a beach ball’ chant at out next home game, I’ll be sat on my armchair singing along, and so will all the other genuine football fans. That is all.

Agree1 Disagree0

23 Oct 2021 01:24:12
Feel a bit sorry for Bruce but then I remember the pay off he probably got and then what rashford and hendo done but more importantly what’s a “ manc scouser”? That’s wrong on both sides so wrong.

19 Oct 2021 22:31:02
Super league hasn’t gone away ye know!

Agree5 Disagree0

20 Oct 2021 03:01:53
Correct, St Helens champions again.

19 Oct 2021 10:30:01
Liverpool in UCL since 2018

2018- lost final to Real MADRID
2019- won final in MADRID
2020- knocked out by Athletico MADRID
2021- knocked out by Real MADRID

Winning tonight could be a great sign of what's to come.

Agree3 Disagree0

19 Oct 2021 10:24:15
Temp ban on sponsorship deals linked to team owners. Led by Leeds owner. 18 for ban, Newcastle against and ManCity abstained!

Shame wasn't done before ManCity did theirs but shows how understandably spooked/ protecting their assets other PL clubs are.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Oct 2021 11:26:58
If the other clubs had voted as Newcastle did it would be a case of Turkeys voting for Christmas. They’ll find a way around it whatever happens,

19 Oct 2021 16:32:23
I don't think it's about protecting their assets as you say. I think it's about stopping the financial doping that City have been doing and Newcastle may take to another level. City abstaining is comical; they had no choice but to do so.

19 Oct 2021 09:05:24
Doubt it would ever happen, but with City supposedly setting their asking price at around £70/ £75m for Sterling, would you take him back?

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Oct 2021 10:07:38
No. He's not worth £70m.

19 Oct 2021 10:15:32
No. How disrespectful would that be to the families of the Hillsborough disaster and to Sean Cox, after Sterling led the singing of songs mocking them? That stuff is unforgivable, particularly given that when given the opportunity to apologise, he didn’t. The apology came from Guardioloa, albeit a qualified one.

I seriously can’t believe this is even a discussion. He’s as welcome as a fart in a crowded lift.

19 Oct 2021 16:33:42
He's not good enough to play for us. Plus he's of suspect character so no thank you.

20 Oct 2021 02:51:25
I wouldn't want to see him back at Liverpool if he was free nevermind £75m. He's nowhere near our level.

19 Oct 2021 08:12:36
How funny all clubs bar City vote against bent sponsorship deals for Newcastle's new owners, maybe they will finally lose their monopoly backing and come back to earth.

Agree1 Disagree0

19 Oct 2021 10:16:18
They’ll find ways around it. As soon as Newcastle are up and running the league is dead as a competition.

19 Oct 2021 16:37:34
there has to be more done to define "sponsorship". I think it's well known how city are "sponsored". It's the football equivalent of money laundering. It needs to be stopped. But teams like us who do it "organically" have shown how to compete the last 3-4 seasons.


Liverpool Discussion Posts 2

Liverpool Discussion Posts 3


Posting / Reply Form

To post you must be logged in with a username. Please Log In or Register for a username.






Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass