Liverpool Rumours Archive June 16 2020

 

Use our rumours form to send us liverpool transfer rumours.

16 Jun 2020 10:47:56
Dear Ed

Liverpool will lost 3-4 HG players at the end of this season. (Lonergan, Clyne, Lallana and Curtice-Davis) .
Would it please be possible if you give us to the solving this issue of the Club?
Any players who are interest by the Club?

Thank you sir.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - My expectation is that Lonergan can be replaced by Kelleher. Clyne has already been replaced by Neco Williams as more than adequate cover for Alexander-Arnold. I would expect Curtis Jones to effectively take Lallana's place in the squad. Isaac Christie-Davies is not out of contract in the summer and was removed from the first team squad in January. I expect he will be available to be sold, but he will not need replacing. So there are no issues here for the club.}

16 Jun 2020 13:28:58
Thanks Eds, glad to know we have enough youngsters to take HG spots of leaving players!

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 13:46:28
Ed what is the clubs thoughts on Paul Glatzel, I know he has recently had an injury he may even still be injured but prior to that he was somewhat prolific, is there a thought/ plan to get him into the first team.

Thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he is highly thought of enough that he was asked by Klopp to do his rehab work with the first team. If it wasn't for his injuries, he would have led the line in the cup games. There is a lot of belief in his ability and his attitude has been exemplary, he has shown real drive to recover from previous injuries. Just have to hope this latest injury, which was a particularly nasty ACL injury which affected other ligaments too, has not destroyed any chance of making it.}

16 Jun 2020 14:45:01
Wouldn't it be amazing to have a new Fowler or Owen come through to the first team? Especially a Fowler who scored all types of goals and didn't reply on speed just instinct and that laser left foot!

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Glatzel is more of a deep-lying type of forward, which is why he linked up so well with Duncan.}

16 Jun 2020 14:56:04
Yes that would be a massive shame if he was to lose his shot due to injury. I remember him and Duncan where highly impressive together and interesting to see how the two have gone about their chances in completely different ways.

I suppose there has never been a greater chance for youth players to take their chance given the economic state of clubs.

Thank you for the reply and your time.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - it will be interesting to see how much of Duncan's scoring was due to Glatzel's quality and if he is really as good as he seemed. I know a couple of people who think he only got the chance because of who he was related to.

It also helps that the changes to allow extra subs should give more opportunities to them as well.

You are very welcome.}

16 Jun 2020 15:33:23
Yes keep forgetting that too, do you think it could be adopted more long term like into the new season?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - that is certainly what Serie A are pushing for, so probably.}

16 Jun 2020 16:05:02
Thanks Ed. Hypothetical question for you - if the 18 year old Robbie Fowler was coming through now, would he force his way into the starting 11 or never get the chance given our front line are so good and reliable.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - Fowler was that good he could force himself into the team. I think people don't realise just how good he was. He was truly special.}

16 Jun 2020 17:21:19
Nobody would give Timmo Werner a second thought if the 18yr old Robbie Fowler was available now, Ed001 is right this kid was special, 5 goals vs fulham, destroying utd's defence and making a fool of there goalkeeper at OT being among his early highlights, such a shame injuries and Houllier ruined his career.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - absolute genius, such a good natural finisher and any free kicks around the edge of the box were almost certain goals. Loved Fowler as a player.}

16 Jun 2020 18:07:06
He got a goal in the 4-3 against Newcastle. The ball came to him but it was in an awkward position and he had no time. The only way to score was hit it hard with the outside of his boot to swerve it away from the keeper. That's what he did. It looked a scrappy goal but it was the only way to score. And he had all of this calculated and executed in a split second. He was magnificent!

Agree2 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 18:25:23
I just watched it on YouTube. A typical mcmanaman run and low cross. Fowler let it come across his body and lashed it in low with the outside of the left foot. It was pure genius. Then he dived into the net after it. One of the great goals I think. My favourite Liverpool player.

Agree2 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 18:25:43
On the extra subs comment, I personally do not hope it is implemented. It ruins many friendly international (if they are not pointless enough) . It is used to draw out games that teams are winning and to break the rhythm. for me, 3 is plenty.

Just my thoughts.

In this crazy time - i understand it (if not support it) but please not in "normal times"

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 20:56:31
The biggest shame for Fowler was that he wasnt given the deserved shot at international level. The best finisher i've ever seen truly.

Agree2 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 22:36:56
I wouldn't mind keeping the 9 on the beach and 5 able to come on. However what if the 2 extra subs had to be youngsters to promote youth development, probably never going to happen but just thought I'd throw that idea out there and see what over people think.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 23:59:32
Ed001 Am I right in thinking fowler not did his knee against Everton and was never quite the same again. We had a good chance of the league that year till the injury if an remembering right. Then Owen took over and the team was built round him football was not as good from then till klopp took over a lot more defensive.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - that is a long time ago and I can't remember who he picked up his injury against now.}

16 Jun 2020 07:04:45
Ed’s, quick question on Lovren.
I read one of your quotes yesterday stating that Lovren chances of a move have diminished in the last 10 days? Why so?
Also, assuming Shaqiri was an option to form part of a deal to sign Werner, that option now being dead in the water, will LFC likely look to do something similar with DC of Sevilla to come in as VVD partner?
Hope you are all safe and well.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - (a) Lovren was a Plan B for Roma but they are close to agreeing their Plan A now. (b) Shaqiri was never part of any deal for Werner - there is the opportunity to include Shaqiri in a deal for Diego Costa but that is of course on the back-burner right now.}

16 Jun 2020 11:19:29
Diego Costa!? Wow, that is an odd move. Didn't think that would be the kind of personality Klopp would be after. I noticed he has been under performing since his return to Atletico, any particular reason Ed002? Injuries?

Agree3 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - It should have said Diego Carlos, who Klopp of course wants as a starter. But Diego Costa may well be available as well.}

16 Jun 2020 11:56:42
Haha, that makes more sense! Although, I am in the Joe Gomez should be starting with VVD corner. so maybe the transfer makes little sense.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Klopp clearly thinks otherwise with interest in Diego Carlos and Diego Llorente as an option - but it all depends on a CB leaving.}

16 Jun 2020 12:11:20
Thank you Ed002. Really hope this doesn't affect Gomez's progression if it happens. Has the potential to be a Liverpool and England great.

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Everyone seems to think a lot of him but there is no doubt that Klopp wants a CB - and those he has been looking at are starters rather than cover. Maybe that will change with the current financial issues.}

16 Jun 2020 12:15:34
I think Gomez still has Neymar in his pocket from that England match. He’s got a big future that lad.

Agree2 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 12:21:10
Sounds like Klopp doesn't see him in the same light as the fans which seems rather strange. Obviously he is in a better position to see how good a player is but the partnership of Gomez and VVD has never lost a game when starting together I believe.

Do you have an opinion on the 2 players mentioned ed? I know little about them and wonder if they can make the transition to the PL without issue. Good enough for Liverpool?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Carlos is seen as an outstanding CB and would be a very good addition to the Premier League. Real Madrid maintain an interest. Diego Llorente is again seen to be well thought of and typically plays in a back three.}

16 Jun 2020 12:32:25
Interesting. Plenty to ponder I suppose.

Thank you for your time and knowledge Ed.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - You are welcome.}

16 Jun 2020 12:57:30
I wonder if Klopp is considering 3 CB's?

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 13:22:17
Kind of think moving to a 343 with 3 excellent and quick centre backs would definitely fit the klopp ethos. Free up Robertson and TAA a little more and continue to defend our half way line like a pack of vicious dogs. Reduces the impact of aging centre mids as we would only need 2 starting each game. This could be klopps finest masterstroke!

Agree2 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 13:37:55
I can sort of understand why Klopp would want Diego Carlos. If VVD did get injured, then Gomez plus DC would seem more than enough to hold the line. Part of me feels like we need another forward, but if Keita can stay healthy and our forwards start passing to Takumi more, I think we will be fine. Before the season was suspended I remember seeing Takumi in many a good position but the others wouldn't pass to him. I think as well if Keita can stay healthy, then our attack would be fine, he looks awesome when he's fit and playing. Then DC makes sense, however I do not think he is a necessary signing.

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 15:06:08
It makes perfect sense to me that JK would want a robust, mostly injury free world class rock to partner VVD in defence. This is no slight on JG or Matip yet neither have shown themselves to be particularly consistent on the injury front.
I would be more than happy to see Carlos brought in, he is a leader a goal scorer, remains injury free and would be another great brazilian addition.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 16:30:26
I don't see why we would want to play 3 CBs. In most games we are controlling possession deep inside the opposition halves with our FBs pushed all the way up. In that scenario why have an extra CB on the pitch at the cost of a midfielder who can likely contribute more in terms of creativity than a CB?

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 18:24:31
Do you expect Matip to stay with us Ed?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Yes.}

16 Jun 2020 20:03:21
Hhanif005 when we push the full backs on you will notice that a centre mid. typically fab will almost make a back 3. The extra CB would serve to allow us to consistently have 7 players in the opposition half. meaning no space for teams to play their game. more turnovers and less running for front players. It honestly would feel like a good evolution of the current system to me.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2020 20:25:46
I am just imagining VVD playing as Sweeper in a back 3 with a licence to move into midfield, akin to Sammer in the early 90s.

What a sight that would be to behold. VVD, striding effortlessly across the turf, advancing up the pitch. The opposition not knowing whether to engage him or simply watch his majestic prowess with awe.

30 yds from goal and with a graceful strike with his right foot, the ball arrows in the top corner.

I need a lie down.

Agree2 Disagree0

 
Change Consent